INTRODUCTION: An unresolved question in resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) is what percentage of estimated arterial occlusion pressure provides the most robust acute muscular response. METHODS: Forty participants were assigned to Experiments 1, 2, or 3. Each experiment completed exercise protocols differing by pressure, exercise load, and/or volume. Torque was measured pre- and postexercise, and muscle activation was measured pre- and during each set. RESULTS: Pressure and load did not affect torque greatly. Muscle activation increased in all conditions (P < 0.05) and was higher with 30% 1RM compared with 20% 1RM. Pressure appeared to increase muscle activation from 40% to 50% arterial occlusion [66% vs. 87% maximal voluntary contraction (30% 1RM)] but was not further increased with higher pressure. CONCLUSION: Different levels of BFR may alter the acute muscular response to a degree, although higher pressures do not appear to augment these changes.
INTRODUCTION: An unresolved question in resistance training combined with blood flow restriction (BFR) is what percentage of estimated arterial occlusion pressure provides the most robust acute muscular response. METHODS: Forty participants were assigned to Experiments 1, 2, or 3. Each experiment completed exercise protocols differing by pressure, exercise load, and/or volume. Torque was measured pre- and postexercise, and muscle activation was measured pre- and during each set. RESULTS: Pressure and load did not affect torque greatly. Muscle activation increased in all conditions (P < 0.05) and was higher with 30% 1RM compared with 20% 1RM. Pressure appeared to increase muscle activation from 40% to 50% arterial occlusion [66% vs. 87% maximal voluntary contraction (30% 1RM)] but was not further increased with higher pressure. CONCLUSION: Different levels of BFR may alter the acute muscular response to a degree, although higher pressures do not appear to augment these changes.
Authors: Manoel E Lixandrão; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Gilberto Laurentino; Cleiton A Libardi; André Y Aihara; Fabiano N Cardoso; Valmor Tricoli; Hamilton Roschel Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2015-09-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Christoph Centner; Ramona Ritzmann; Stephan Schur; Albert Gollhofer; Daniel König Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Gilberto C Laurentino; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Manoel E Lixandrão; Carlos Ugrinowitsch; Ricardo Berton; Felipe C Vechin; Miguel S Conceição; Felipe Damas; Cleiton A Libardi; Hamilton Roschel Journal: Sports Med Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Pedro Fatela; Joana F Reis; Goncalo V Mendonca; Janne Avela; Pedro Mil-Homens Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2016-03-26 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Scott J Dankel; Matthew B Jessee; Kevin T Mattocks; J Grant Mouser; Brittany R Counts; Samuel L Buckner; Jeremy P Loenneke Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 11.136