Literature DB >> 3403595

Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum.

H Kojimoto1, N Yasui, T Goto, S Matsuda, Y Shimomura.   

Abstract

The histology and mechanics of leg lengthening by callus distraction were studied in 27 growing rabbits. Tibial diaphyses were subjected to subperiosteal osteotomy, held in a neutral position for 10 days and then slowly distracted at 0.25 mm/12 hours, using a dynamic external fixator. Radiographs showed that the gap became filled with callus having three distinct zones. Elongation appeared to occur in a central radiolucent zone; this was bounded by two sclerotic zones. Histologically, the radiolucent zone consisted of longitudinally arranged cartilage and fibrous tissue while the sclerotic zones were formed by fine cancellous bone. New bone occasionally contained islands of cartilage, suggesting it had been formed by endochondral ossification. After completion of distraction, the two sclerotic zones fused, shrank and were eventually absorbed, leaving tubular bone with a new cortex. When the periosteum had been removed at the operation, callus formation was markedly disturbed and there was failure of bone lengthening. Scraping of endosteum, in contrast, did not have a pronounced effect. These results suggest that the preservation of periosteum is essential if bone lengthening by callus distraction is to succeed, and that preservation of the periosteum is more important than careful corticotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3403595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  33 in total

1.  Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy.

Authors:  J Hu; J Li; D Wang; M J Buckley; S Agarwal
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Quantification of the microstructural anisotropy of distraction osteogenesis in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Kevin B Jones; Nozomu Inoue; John E Tis; Edward F McCarthy; Kathleen A McHale; Edmund Y S Chao
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2005

3.  Callus patterns in femur lengthening using a monolateral external fixator.

Authors:  Dileep Isaac; Harry Fernandez; Hae-Ryong Song; Tae-Young Kim; Ashok Kumar Shyam; Seok-Hyun Lee; Jong-Chan Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Objective guidelines for removing an external fixator after tibial lengthening using pixel value ratio: a pilot study.

Authors:  Li Zhao; Qing Fan; K P Venkatesh; Man S Park; Hae Ryong Song
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tibial lengthening using a reamed type intramedullary nail and an Ilizarov external fixator.

Authors:  Hayoung Kim; Sang Ki Lee; Kap Jung Kim; Jae Hoon Ahn; Won Sik Choy; Yong In Kim; Jea Yun Koo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Bone regeneration and limb lengthening.

Authors:  P Merloz
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Bone lengthening (distraction osteogenesis): a literature review.

Authors:  F Sailhan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Insufficient bone regenerate after intramedullary femoral lengthening: risk factors and classification system.

Authors:  Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis; Rupert Meller; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bone lengthening osteogenesis, a combination of intramembranous and endochondral ossification: an experimental study in sheep.

Authors:  Francisco Forriol; Luca Denaro; Umile Giuseppe Longo; Hirofumi Taira; Nicola Maffulli; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr       Date:  2010-03-10

10.  Periosteal cells are a major source of soft callus in bone fracture.

Authors:  Hiroki Murao; Koji Yamamoto; Shuichi Matsuda; Haruhiko Akiyama
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.626

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.