Literature DB >> 12102418

Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy.

J Hu1, J Li, D Wang, M J Buckley, S Agarwal.   

Abstract

Corticotomy or osteotomy was performed on opposing sides of the mandibles in 18 goats. A custom-made distractor was used to lengthen the mandible at a rate of 1 mm/day for 10 days (total 10 mm elongation). Six goats were sacrificed respectively at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after completion of distraction. The distracted calluses were harvested and processed for radiographic, histologic, and scanning electron microscopic evaluation as well as Ca/P ratio analysis. The regenerate bone in the corticotomy side showed more bone formation and earlier mineralization than in the osteotomy side. The results of this study suggest that preservation of intramedullary vessels is beneficial to bone regeneration following mandibular osteodistraction, and that performing corticotomy may be a simple but effective way to promote the maturity of the distracted callus and shorten the time for fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12102418      PMCID: PMC4950923          DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0901-5027            Impact factor:   2.789


  17 in total

1.  Tooth-borne distraction to widen the mandible. Technical note.

Authors:  B Niederhagen; B Braumann; S Bergé; J J von Lindern; T Appel
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.789

2.  Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model.

Authors:  M J Troulis; J Glowacki; D H Perrott; L B Kaban
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.895

3.  Distraction osteogenesis for mandibular advancement.

Authors:  P J van Strijen; F B Perdijk; A G Becking; K H Breuning
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. An experimental study on sheep.

Authors:  T Karaharju-Suvanto; J Peltonen; A Kahri; E O Karaharju
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Segmental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis. An experimental study.

Authors:  P D Costantino; G Shybut; C D Friedman; H J Pelzer; M Masini; M L Shindo; G A Sisson
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1990-05

6.  Effect of electrical stimulation on mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  T Hagiwara; W H Bell
Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction.

Authors:  G A Ilizarov
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Transplantation of osteoblast-like cells to the distracted callus in rabbits.

Authors:  S Tsubota; H Tsuchiya; Y Shinokawa; K Tomita; H Minato
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1999-01

9.  Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction. The role of periosteum and endosteum.

Authors:  H Kojimoto; N Yasui; T Goto; S Matsuda; Y Shimomura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1988-08

10.  Evaluation of distraction osteogenesis by scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  T M Ganey; D W Klotch; A S Slater-Haase; J Sasse
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  3 in total

1.  Are endogenous BMPs necessary for bone healing during distraction osteogenesis?

Authors:  Norine Alam; René St-Arnaud; Dominique Lauzier; Vicki Rosen; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Treatment of Class II open bite complicated by an ankylosed maxillary central incisor.

Authors:  Dong-Hyun Hwang; Ki-Ho Park; Yong-Dae Kwon; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  The effect of heparan sulfate application on bone formation during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Marie Gdalevitch; Bahar Kasaai; Norine Alam; Bruno Dohin; Dominique Lauzier; Reggie C Hamdy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.