Literature DB >> 34035136

Aversive Conditioning of Spatial Position Sharpens Neural Population-Level Tuning in Visual Cortex and Selectively Alters Alpha-Band Activity.

Wendel M Friedl1, Andreas Keil2.   

Abstract

Processing capabilities for many low-level visual features are experientially malleable, aiding sighted organisms in adapting to dynamic environments. Explicit instructions to attend a specific visual field location influence retinotopic visuocortical activity, amplifying responses to stimuli appearing at cued spatial positions. It remains undetermined both how such prioritization affects surrounding nonprioritized locations, and if a given retinotopic spatial position can attain enhanced cortical representation through experience rather than instruction. The current report examined visuocortical response changes as human observers (N = 51, 19 male) learned, through differential classical conditioning, to associate specific screen locations with aversive outcomes. Using dense-array EEG and pupillometry, we tested the preregistered hypotheses of either sharpening or generalization around an aversively associated location following a single conditioning session. Competing hypotheses tested whether mean response changes would take the form of a Gaussian (generalization) or difference-of-Gaussian (sharpening) distribution over spatial positions, peaking at the viewing location paired with a noxious noise. Occipital 15 Hz steady-state visual evoked potential responses were selectively heightened when viewing aversively paired locations and displayed a nonlinear, difference-of-Gaussian profile across neighboring locations, consistent with suppressive surround modulation of nonprioritized positions. Measures of alpha-band (8-12 Hz) activity were differentially altered in anterior versus posterior locations, while pupil diameter exhibited selectively heightened responses to noise-paired locations but did not evince differences across the nonpaired locations. These results indicate that visuocortical spatial representations are sharpened in response to location-specific aversive conditioning, while top-down influences indexed by alpha-power reduction exhibit posterior generalization and anterior sharpening.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT It is increasingly recognized that early visual cortex is not a static processor of physical features, but is instead constantly shaped by perceptual experience. It remains unclear, however, to what extent the cortical representation of many fundamental features, including visual field location, is malleable by experience. Using EEG and an aversive classical conditioning paradigm, we observed sharpening of visuocortical responses to stimuli appearing at aversively associated locations along with location-selective facilitation of response systems indexed by pupil diameter and EEG alpha power. These findings highlight the experience-dependent flexibility of retinotopic spatial representations in visual cortex, opening avenues toward novel treatment targets in disorders of attention and spatial cognition.
Copyright © 2021 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; alpha; associative learning; conditioning; generalization; steady-state visual evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34035136      PMCID: PMC8244982          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2889-20.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  77 in total

1.  The spatial resolution of visual attention.

Authors:  J Intriligator; P Cavanagh
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  α-Oscillations in the monkey sensorimotor network influence discrimination performance by rhythmical inhibition of neuronal spiking.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens; Verónica Nácher; Rogelio Luna; Ranulfo Romo; Ole Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Sabrina Pitzalis; Teresa Aprile; Grazia Spitoni; Fabiana Patria; Alessandra Stella; Donatella Spinelli; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Aversive learning modulates cortical representations of object categories.

Authors:  Joseph E Dunsmoor; Philip A Kragel; Alex Martin; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Arousal-Biased Competition in Perception and Memory.

Authors:  Mara Mather; Matthew R Sutherland
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-03

6.  A model for Pavlovian learning: variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.

Authors:  J M Pearce; G Hall
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Neural signatures of human fear conditioning: an updated and extended meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

Authors:  M A Fullana; B J Harrison; C Soriano-Mas; B Vervliet; N Cardoner; A Àvila-Parcet; J Radua
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 8.  Functional Specialization in the Attention Network.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 24.137

9.  Generalization of conditioned fear-potentiated startle in humans: experimental validation and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Shmuel Lissek; Arter L Biggs; Stephanie J Rabin; Brian R Cornwell; Ruben P Alvarez; Daniel S Pine; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2008-03-10

10.  Attention modulates spatial priority maps in the human occipital, parietal and frontal cortices.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; John T Serences
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Self-Reported Misophonia Symptoms and Auditory Aversive Generalization Leaning: A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Richard T Ward; Faith E Gilbert; Jourdan Pouliot; Payton Chiasson; Skylar McIlvanie; Caitlin Traiser; Kierstin Riels; Ryan Mears; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 5.152

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.