Literature DB >> 34034520

Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Jeff Gau1, Ryan Gemilere2, Lds-Vip Fm Subteam2,3, James Lynch4, Nick Gravish4, Simon Sponberg2,3.   

Abstract

Centimetre-scale fliers must contend with the high power requirements of flapping flight. Insects have elastic elements in their thoraxes which may reduce the inertial costs of their flapping wings. Matching wingbeat frequency to a mechanical resonance can be energetically favourable, but also poses control challenges. Many insects use frequency modulation on long timescales, but wingstroke-to-wingstroke modulation of wingbeat frequencies in a resonant spring-wing system is potentially costly because muscles must work against the elastic flight system. Nonetheless, rapid frequency and amplitude modulation may be a useful control modality. The hawkmoth Manduca sexta has an elastic thorax capable of storing and returning significant energy. However, its nervous system also has the potential to modulate the driving frequency of flapping because its flight muscles are synchronous. We tested whether hovering hawkmoths rapidly alter frequency during perturbations with vortex rings. We observed both frequency modulation (32% around mean) and amplitude modulation (37%) occurring over several wingstrokes. Instantaneous phase analysis of wing kinematics revealed that more than 85% of perturbation responses required active changes in neurogenic driving frequency. Unlike their robotic counterparts that abdicate frequency modulation for energy efficiency, synchronous insects use wingstroke-to-wingstroke frequency modulation despite the power demands required for deviating from resonance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Manduca; flight; frequency modulation; perturbation; resonance

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34034520      PMCID: PMC8150018          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.530


  44 in total

Review 1.  The aerodynamics of insect flight.

Authors:  Sanjay P Sane
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The mechanics and control of pitching manoeuvres in a freely flying hawkmoth (Manduca sexta).

Authors:  Bo Cheng; Xinyan Deng; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Towards testable neuromechanical control architectures for running.

Authors:  Shai Revzen; Daniel E Koditschek; Robert J Full
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Asymmetry costs: effects of wing damage on hovering flight performance in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta.

Authors:  María José Fernández; Marion E Driver; Tyson L Hedrick
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The mechanics of flight in the hawkmoth Manduca sexta. II. Aerodynamic consequences of kinematic and morphological variation.

Authors:  A P Willmott; C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Leg stiffness and stride frequency in human running.

Authors:  C T Farley; O González
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 7.  The novel aerodynamics of insect flight: applications to micro-air vehicles.

Authors:  C P Ellington
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Neuro-muscular control of dipteran flight.

Authors:  W Nachtigall; D M Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Kinematic flexibility allows bumblebees to increase energetic efficiency when carrying heavy loads.

Authors:  Stacey A Combes; Susan F Gagliardi; Callin M Switzer; Michael E Dillon
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Dual dimensionality reduction reveals independent encoding of motor features in a muscle synergy for insect flight control.

Authors:  Simon Sponberg; Thomas L Daniel; Adrienne L Fairhall
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  5 in total

1.  The hawkmoth wingbeat is not at resonance.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ethan S Wold; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.812

2.  Distinct forms of resonant optimality within insect indirect flight motors.

Authors:  Arion Pons; Tsevi Beatus
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Rapid frequency modulation in a resonant system: aerial perturbation recovery in hawkmoths.

Authors:  Jeff Gau; Ryan Gemilere; Lds-Vip Fm Subteam; James Lynch; Nick Gravish; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 5.530

Review 4.  How and why do bees buzz? Implications for buzz pollination.

Authors:  Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Stability and manoeuvrability in animal movement: lessons from biology, modelling and robotics.

Authors:  Andrew A Biewener; Richard J Bomphrey; Monica A Daley; Auke J Ijspeert
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 5.349

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.