Literature DB >> 34031305

Diversifying the Research Workforce as a Programmatic Priority for a Career Development Award Program at Duke University.

Kimberly S Johnson1, Rasheed Gbadegesin2, Amanda E McMillan3, Stephanie Molner4, L Ebony Boulware5, Laura P Svetkey6.   

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has prioritized efforts to increase diversity in the biomedical research workforce. NIH-funded institutional career development awards may serve as one mechanism to facilitate these efforts. In 2013, the Duke University KL2 program, an internal career development program funded by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, set a goal to increase the number of investigators from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs) to ≥ 50% of KL2 awardees. From 2013 to 2019, 133 KL2 applications were received, 38% from UREG investigators. Of the 21 scholars selected, 10 (47.6%) were UREG investigators; all were Black/African American. This represents a threefold increase in the proportion of UREG applications and a sixfold increase in the proportion of UREG KL2 scholars compared with Duke's previous KL2 cycles (2003-2012), during which only 13% of applicants and 8.3% of funded scholars were UREGs. Of the 12 KL2 scholars (7 UREG) who completed the program, 5 have received NIH funding as principal investigators of an external K award or R01, and 4 of them are UREG investigators; this constitutes a post-KL2 NIH funding success rate of 57% (4/7) for UREG scholars. Achieving this programmatic priority was facilitated by institutional support, clear communication of goals to increase the proportion of UREG KL2 awardees, and intentional strategies to identify and support applicants. Strategies included targeted outreach to UREG investigators, partnerships with other institutional entities, structured assistance for investigators with preparing their applications, and a KL2 program structure addressing common barriers to success for UREG investigators, such as lack of consistent mentorship, protected research time, and peer support. The authors' experience suggests that KL2 and other internal career development programs may represent a scalable, national strategy to increase diversity in the biomedical research workforce.
Copyright © 2021 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34031305      PMCID: PMC8162265          DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   7.840


  12 in total

1.  The POD: a new model for mentoring underrepresented minority faculty.

Authors:  Charlotte Lewellen-Williams; Virginia A Johnson; Linda A Deloney; Billy R Thomas; Apollos Goyol; Ronda Henry-Tillman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  The Impact of Individual Mentored Career Development (K) Awards on the Research Trajectories of Early-Career Scientists.

Authors:  Silda Nikaj; P Kay Lund
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  Examining trends in the diversity of the U.S. National Institutes of Health participating and funded workforce.

Authors:  Silda Nikaj; Deepshikha Roychowdhury; P Kay Lund; Marguerite Matthews; Katrina Pearson
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards.

Authors:  Donna K Ginther; Walter T Schaffer; Joshua Schnell; Beth Masimore; Faye Liu; Laurel L Haak; Raynard Kington
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Measuring Diversity of the National Institutes of Health-Funded Workforce.

Authors:  Misty L Heggeness; Lisa Evans; Jennifer Reineke Pohlhaus; Sherry L Mills
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Research Studies: The Challenge of Creating More Diverse Cohorts.

Authors:  Lindsey Konkel
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists.

Authors:  Travis A Hoppe; Aviva Litovitz; Kristine A Willis; Rebecca A Meseroll; Matthew J Perkins; B Ian Hutchins; Alison F Davis; Michael S Lauer; Hannah A Valantine; James M Anderson; George M Santangelo
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  KL2 mentored career development programs at clinical and translational science award hubs: Practices and outcomes.

Authors:  Christine A Sorkness; Linda Scholl; Alecia M Fair; Jason G Umans
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2019-12-26

9.  Diversity in Clinical and Biomedical Research: A Promise Yet to Be Fulfilled.

Authors:  Sam S Oh; Joshua Galanter; Neeta Thakur; Maria Pino-Yanes; Nicolas E Barcelo; Marquitta J White; Danielle M de Bruin; Ruth M Greenblatt; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Alan H B Wu; Luisa N Borrell; Chris Gunter; Neil R Powe; Esteban G Burchard
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  1 in total

1.  Perceptions of gender equity and markers of achievement in a National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Lorna R Henderson; Rinita Dam; Syed Ghulam Sarwar Shah; Pavel V Ovseiko; Vasiliki Kiparoglou
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-09-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.