Literature DB >> 16501276

The POD: a new model for mentoring underrepresented minority faculty.

Charlotte Lewellen-Williams1, Virginia A Johnson, Linda A Deloney, Billy R Thomas, Apollos Goyol, Ronda Henry-Tillman.   

Abstract

Mentoring, long recognized as a catalyst for successful careers, is particularly important to the career development of underrepresented minority (URM) faculty. In academic medicine, mentor-protégé relationships are seriously threatened by increased clinical, research, and administrative demands and an emphasis on scholarship over citizenship. New mentoring models are needed, and they should be adaptable to a medical school's unique structure and mission. The Peer-Onsite-Distance (POD) model, developed in 2002 by the authors and introduced at the College of Medicine at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, is a targeted, multilevel mentoring prototype that is built on a solid research foundation and tailored to the unique needs of URM medical school faculty. The mentee's individual needs for guidance related to career goals, resources, and the content and interaction skills that are known to be critical to successful academic careers are targeted for development. The multilevel approach provides a unique network of peer and faculty mentors who provide site-specific career guidance. Also in the network are leaders in their fields who can provide access to accurate information, cautions, predictions, and announcements of future resources or potential restrictions in academic medicine. Mentor commitments are clearly defined and time contributions are maximized. The POD model aims to promote retention and advance the careers of URM faculty by wrapping them in a protective cushion of interpersonal and intrapersonal support. The flexibility of the design allows for adaptation to any institution's unique structure and mission.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16501276     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200603000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  42 in total

Review 1.  New technologies for the surgical curriculum.

Authors:  Rajesh Aggarwal; Julian Leong; Daniel Leff; Oliver Warren; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara Darzi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical training and certification in the United kingdom.

Authors:  Andrew J Smith; Rajesh Aggarwal; Oliver J Warren; Paraskevas Paraskeva
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Key issues in mentoring in HIV prevention and mental health for new investigators from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups.

Authors:  Andrew D Forsyth; David M Stoff
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Variables associated with full-time faculty appointment among contemporary U.S. Medical school graduates: implications for academic medicine workforce diversity.

Authors:  Dorothy A Andriole; Donna B Jeffe; Heather L Hageman; Kimberly Ephgrave; Monica L Lypson; Brian Mavis; Leon McDougle; Nicole K Roberts
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Development and implementation of a workshop to enhance the effectiveness of mentors working with diverse mentees in HIV research.

Authors:  Monica Gandhi; Alicia Fernandez; David M Stoff; Swathi Narahari; Michael Blank; Jonathan Fuchs; Clyde H Evans; James S Kahn; Mallory O Johnson
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 2.205

6.  A Perspective on Promoting Diversity in the Biomedical Research Workforce: The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's PRIDE Program.

Authors:  Josephine E A Boyington; Nita J Maihle; Treva K Rice; Juan E Gonzalez; Caryl A Hess; Levi H Makala; Donna B Jeffe; Gbenga Ogedegbe; Dabeeru C Rao; Victor G Dávila-Román; Betty S Pace; Girardin Jean-Louis; Mohamed Boutjdir
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Minority faculty voices on diversity in academic medicine: perspectives from one school.

Authors:  Megan R Mahoney; Elisabeth Wilson; Kara L Odom; Loma Flowers; Shelley R Adler
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Mentor networks in academic medicine: moving beyond a dyadic conception of mentoring for junior faculty researchers.

Authors:  Rochelle DeCastro; Dana Sambuco; Peter A Ubel; Abigail Stewart; Reshma Jagsi
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 9.  Mentoring programs for underrepresented minority faculty in academic medical centers: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Bettina M Beech; Jorge Calles-Escandon; Kristen G Hairston; Sarah E Langdon; Brenda A Latham-Sadler; Ronny A Bell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Does mentoring matter: results from a survey of faculty mentees at a large health sciences university.

Authors:  Mitchell D Feldman; Patricia A Arean; Sally J Marshall; Mark Lovett; Patricia O'Sullivan
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2010-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.