Literature DB >> 34029677

Timing of Complication and Failure to Rescue after Hepatectomy: Single-Institution Analysis of 28 Years of Hepatic Surgery.

Lily V Saadat1, Debra A Goldman2, Mithat Gonen2, Kevin C Soares3, Alice C Wei3, Vinod P Balachandran3, T Peter Kingham3, Jeffrey Drebin3, William R Jarnagin3, Michael I D'Angelica3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbidity after hepatectomy remains a significant, potentially preventable, outcome. Understanding the pattern of complications and rescue pathways is critical for the development of targeted initiatives intended to salvage patients after operative morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients undergoing liver resection from 1991 to 2018 at a single institution were analyzed. Failure to rescue (FTR) was defined as percentage of deaths in patients with a complication within 30 days. Generalized estimating equations with log-link function assessed associations between clinical characteristics and major complications and between complications at fewer than 30 days and 30 to 90 days. Logistic regression assessed associations between complications and FTR.
RESULTS: A total of 6,191 patients and 6,668 operations were identified, of which 55.6% were performed for management of metastatic colorectal cancer. Major complications (grade ≥3) occurred in 20.2% of operations (1,346 of 6,668). Ninety-day mortality was 2.2%. The most common complication was intra-abdominal abscess at 9.0% (95% CI, 8.3% to 9.7%). Ten percent of patients with a complication at 30 days had another complication between 30 and 90 days compared with 2% without an early complication (odds ratio [OR] 5.09; 95% CI, 3.97 to 6.54; p < 0.001). FTR for liver failure, cardiac arrest, abscess, and hemorrhage was 36%, 56%, 3%, and 6%, respectively. Risk of 90-day mortality was higher in patients with liver failure (53% vs 2%; OR 61.42; 95% CI, 37.47 to 100.67; p < 0.001), cardiac arrest (69% vs 2%; OR 96.95; 95% CI, 33.23 to 283.80; p < 0.001), hemorrhage (11% vs 2%; OR 5.51; 95% CI, 2.59 to 11.73; p < 0.001), and abscess (7% vs 2%; OR 4.05; 95% CI, 2.76 to 5.94; p < 0.001) compared with those without these complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Morbidity after hepatectomy is frequent despite low mortality. This study identifies targets for improvement in morbidity and failure to rescue after hepatectomy. Efforts to improve recognition and intervention for infections and early complications are needed to improve outcomes.
Copyright © 2021 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34029677      PMCID: PMC8503809          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.532


  41 in total

1.  Progressive necrosis after hepatectomy and the pathophysiology of liver failure after massive resection.

Authors:  Y Panis; D M McMullan; J C Emond
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  A standard definition of major hepatectomy: resection of four or more liver segments.

Authors:  Srinevas K Reddy; Andrew S Barbas; Ryan S Turley; Jennifer L Steel; Allan Tsung; J Wallis Marsh; David A Geller; Bryan M Clary
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Defining Post Hepatectomy Liver Insufficiency: Where do We stand?

Authors:  Kelly Lafaro; Stefan Buettner; Hadia Maqsood; Doris Wagner; Fabio Bagante; Gaya Spolverato; Li Xu; Ihab Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Post Hepatectomy Liver Failure Risk Calculator for Preoperative and Early Postoperative Period Following Major Hepatectomy.

Authors:  Jessica Y Liu; Ryan J Ellis; Q Lina Hu; Mark E Cohen; David B Hoyt; Anthony D Yang; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Timothy M Pawlik; Karl Y Bilimoria; Ryan P Merkow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Risk factors for postoperative complications after liver resection.

Authors:  Hui-Chuan Sun; Lun-Xiu Qin; Lu Wang; Qin-Hai Ye; Zhi-Quan Wu; Jia Fan; Zhao-You Tang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int       Date:  2005-08

6.  Increased use of parenchymal-sparing surgery for bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with improved mortality without change in oncologic outcome: trends in treatment over time in 440 patients.

Authors:  Jason S Gold; Chandrakanth Are; Peter Kornprat; William R Jarnagin; Mithat Gönen; Yuman Fong; Ronald P DeMatteo; Leslie H Blumgart; Michael D'Angelica
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Hepatic insufficiency and mortality in 1,059 noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy.

Authors:  John T Mullen; Dario Ribero; Srinevas K Reddy; Matteo Donadon; Daria Zorzi; Shiva Gautam; Eddie K Abdalla; Steven A Curley; Lorenzo Capussotti; Bryan M Clary; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database.

Authors:  Thomas A Aloia; Bridget N Fahy; Craig P Fischer; Stephen L Jones; Andrea Duchini; Joseph Galati; A Osama Gaber; R Mark Ghobrial; Barbara L Bass
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  A comparison of right and extended right hepatectomy with all other hepatic resections for colorectal liver metastases: a ten-year study.

Authors:  N D Karanjia; J T Lordan; N Quiney; W J Fawcett; T R Worthington; J Remington
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Hepatic parenchymal preservation surgery: decreasing morbidity and mortality rates in 4,152 resections for malignancy.

Authors:  T Peter Kingham; Camilo Correa-Gallego; Michael I D'Angelica; Mithat Gönen; Ronald P DeMatteo; Yuman Fong; Peter J Allen; Leslie H Blumgart; William R Jarnagin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.