Literature DB >> 9037225

Progressive necrosis after hepatectomy and the pathophysiology of liver failure after massive resection.

Y Panis1, D M McMullan, J C Emond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mortality after hepatectomy in rats increases markedly beyond the classic 2/3 resection from which complete recovery is the rule. Because an extremely small hepatocyte population can theoretically sustain life, we hypothesize that lethal liver failure after subtotal resection could be due to progressive injury occurring in the remnant liver. The obligatory increase in portal blood through the small remnant may be central to the pathogenesis because of sinusoidal injury and Kupffer's cell activation. To test this hypothesis an experimental study in rats was undertaken to characterize liver cell injury after lethal (85%) and nonlethal (70%) hepatectomy.
METHODS: One hundred thirty Wistar rats were divided into three groups: control group (Sham laparotomy, n = 30), 70[5] hepatectomy group (n = 50), and 85% hepatectomy group (n = 50). Five rats in each group were killed for blood and liver collections from 15 minutes to day 14 after hepatectomy. Survival, histologic characteristics, serum activities of aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferases and arginase were determined; serum level of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and plasma level of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
RESULTS: Whatever the extent of resection, hepatic injury, as demonstrated by increased serum levels of arginase, ALT, and AST, was observed. The kinetics of arginase release after hepatectomy mimicked quite well those of AST and ALT, representing a reliable marker of hepatocyte injury. A significantly higher, more prolonged blood release of enzymes was observed after 85% hepatectomy than after 70% hepatectomy. Because of a very short half-life the rise in arginase several hours after hepatectomy seems to indicate ongoing liver damage distinct from the surgical injury. Significant elevations of TNF-alpha were detected that were much more severe after 85% hepatectomy. PGE2 levels that increased significantly after 70% resection remained depressed after 8% hepatectomy. Light microscopy demonstrated extensive patchy necrosis after 85% hepatectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: A pattern of progressive necrosis of the remnant liver was identified with Kupffer's cell dysfunction. We hypothesize that failure of down-regulation of TNF-alpha production by PGE2 could contribute to the pathophysiology of liver injury in the remnant after massive hepatectomy. These events may be initiated in part by the dramatic increase of portal flow through a too small remaining liver, and a pathologic mechanism may be amenable to pharmacologic manipulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9037225     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90283-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  56 in total

Review 1.  Animal models of acute hepatic failure.

Authors:  T M Rahman; H J Hodgson
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Transplantation of primary and reversibly immortalized human liver cells and other gene therapies in acute liver failure and decompensated chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Stephen M Riordan; Roger Williams
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Changes in the expression of lipid-mediated signal-transducing enzymes in the rat liver after partial hepatectomy.

Authors:  A Watanabe; S Nakashima; T Adachi; S Saji; Y Nozawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 4.  Small for size liver remnant following resection: prevention and management.

Authors:  Rony Eshkenazy; Yael Dreznik; Eylon Lahat; Barak Bar Zakai; Alex Zendel; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Opposing roles of RAGE and Myd88 signaling in extensive liver resection.

Authors:  Shan Zeng; Qing Yin Zhang; Jianzhong Huang; Srinivasan Vedantham; Rosa Rosario; Radha Ananthakrishnan; Shi Fang Yan; Ravichandran Ramasamy; Ronald P DeMatteo; Jean C Emond; Richard A Friedman; Ann Marie Schmidt
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Ratio of remnant to total liver volume or remnant to body weight: which one is more predictive on donor outcomes?

Authors:  Onur Yaprak; Necdet Guler; Gulum Altaca; Murat Dayangac; Tolga Demirbas; Murat Akyildiz; Levent Ulusoy; Yaman Tokat; Yildiray Yuzer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Excessive portal flow causes graft failure in extremely small-for-size liver transplantation in pigs.

Authors:  Hong-Sheng Wang; Nobuhiro Ohkohchi; Yoshitaka Enomoto; Masahiro Usuda; Shigehito Miyagi; Takeshi Asakura; Hiroo Masuoka; Takashi Aiso; Keisuke Fukushima; Tomohiro Narita; Hideyuki Yamaya; Atsushi Nakamura; Satoshi Sekiguchi; Naoki Kawagishi; Akira Sato; Susumu Satomi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  A model of liver regeneration.

Authors:  Leon A Furchtgott; Carson C Chow; Vipul Periwal
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Hepatic Hemodynamics and Portal Flow Modulation: The A2ALL Experience.

Authors:  Jean C Emond; Nathan P Goodrich; James J Pomposelli; Talia B Baker; Abhinav Humar; David R Grant; Peter Abt; Chris E Friese; Robert A Fisher; Igal Kam; Averell H Sherker; Brenda W Gillespie; Robert M Merion
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Is extended hepatectomy for hepatobiliary malignancy justified?

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Timothy M Pawlik; Eddie K Abdalla; James F Arens; Rabih A Nemr; Steven H Wei; Debra L Kennamer; Lee M Ellis; Steven A Curley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.