Literature DB >> 17481498

Hepatic insufficiency and mortality in 1,059 noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy.

John T Mullen1, Dario Ribero, Srinevas K Reddy, Matteo Donadon, Daria Zorzi, Shiva Gautam, Eddie K Abdalla, Steven A Curley, Lorenzo Capussotti, Bryan M Clary, Jean-Nicolas Vauthey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To establish a reliable definition of postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) in noncirrhotic patients undergoing major hepatectomy. No standard definition of PHI has been established, but one is essential for meaningful comparison of outcomes data across studies.
METHODS: Data from 1,059 noncirrhotic patients who underwent major hepatectomy (3 or more liver segments) at 3 centers from 1995 to 2005 were analyzed. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis of peak postoperative bilirubin ((Peak)Bil) and international normalized ratio ((Peak)INR) were used to define PHI.
RESULTS: A total of 669 patients (63%) underwent resection of 3 to 4 liver segments; 390 (37%) underwent resection of 5 or more segments. Complications occurred in 453 (43%). The 90-day all-cause mortality rate was 4.7%, which is 47% higher than the 30-day rate (3.2%). Twenty (1.9%) patients died of causes unrelated to the liver. Of the remaining 1,039 patients, 30 (2.8%) died a median 36 days from liver-related causes (liver failure with or without multiorgan failure). ROC analysis revealed cut-offs that predict liver-related death are (Peak)Bil 7.0 mg/dL (area under the curve 0.982; sensitivity 93.3%; specificity 94.3%) and (Peak)INR 2.0 (area under the curve 0.846; sensitivity 76.7%; specificity 82.0%). (Peak)Bil > 7.0 mg/dL was the most powerful predictor of any (odds ratio [OR] = 83.3) or major complication (OR = 10.0), 90-day mortality (OR = 10.8), and 90-day liver-related mortality (OR = 250) (all p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: PHI defined as (Peak)Bil > 7.0 mg/dL accurately predicts liver-related death and worse outcomes after major hepatectomy. Standardized reporting of complications, PHI, and 90-day mortality is essential to accurately determine the risk of major hepatectomy and to compare outcomes data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481498     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  198 in total

Review 1.  Small for size liver remnant following resection: prevention and management.

Authors:  Rony Eshkenazy; Yael Dreznik; Eylon Lahat; Barak Bar Zakai; Alex Zendel; Arie Ariche
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Pancreatic injury after major hepatectomy: a study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Nikolaos Arkadopoulos; Constantinos Nastos; George Defterevos; Konstantinos Kalimeris; Nikolaos Papoutsidakis; Ioanna Andreadou; Tzortzis Nomikos; Agathi Pafiti; George Fragulidis; Emmanuel Economou; Panagiotis Varsos; Georgia Kostopanagiotou; Vassilios Smyrniotis
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Estimate or calculate? How surgeons rate volumes and surfaces.

Authors:  Jochen Schuld; Otto Kollmar; Roland Seidel; Catherine Black; Martin K Schilling; Sven Richter
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Characterization of a porcine model for associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for a staged hepatectomy.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Shennen A Mao; Jaime M Glorioso; Murli Krishna; Scott L Nyberg; David M Nagorney
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Kinetic Changes in Liver Parenchyma After Preoperative Chemotherapy for Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Keigo Tani; Junichi Shindoh; Takeshi Takamoto; Junji Shibahara; Yujiro Nishioka; Takuya Hashimoto; Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Masatoshi Makuuchi; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Is the liver kinetic growth rate in ALPPS unprecedented when compared with PVE and living donor liver transplant? A multicentre analysis.

Authors:  Kristopher P Croome; Roberto Hernandez-Alejandro; Maile Parker; Julie Heimbach; Charles Rosen; David M Nagorney
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.647

7.  Predictive Ability of Preoperative PT-INR and Postoperative MCP1 for Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure.

Authors:  Sayaka Arisaka; Ryusei Matsuyama; Koki Goto; Yusuke Suwa; Ryutaro Mori; Daisuke Morioka; Masataka Taguri; Itaru Endo
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Early trends in serum phosphate and creatinine levels are associated with mortality following major hepatectomy.

Authors:  Garth S Herbert; Kara B Prussing; Amber L Simpson; Michael I D'Angelica; Peter J Allen; Ronald P DeMatteo; William R Jarnagin; T Peter Kingham
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guideline for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.519

10.  Kinetics of liver function tests after a hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases predict post-operative liver failure as defined by the International Study Group for Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Keith J Roberts; Kishore G S Bharathy; J Peter A Lodge
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.