Literature DB >> 34019659

Robbing Peter to Pay Paul: Competition for Radiogenic Breaks During Rejoining Diminishes Curvature in the Dose Response for Simple Chromosome Exchanges.

Igor Shuryak1, Bradford D Loucas2, Michael N Cornforth2.   

Abstract

The large majority of chromosome damage produced by ionizing radiations takes the form of exchange aberrations. For simple exchanges between two chromosomes, multi-fluor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH) studies confirm that the dose response to X rays or gamma rays is quasilinear with dose. This result is in seeming conflict with generalized theories of radiation action that depend on the interaction of lesions as the source of curvature in dose-response relationships. A qualitative explanation for such "linearization" had been previously proposed but lacked quantitative support. The essence of this explanation is that during the rejoining of radiogenic chromosome breaks, competition for breaks (CFB) between different aberration types often results in formation of complex exchange aberrations at the expense of simple reciprocal exchange events. This process becomes more likely at high radiation doses, where the number of contemporaneous breaks is high and complex exchanges involving multiple breaks become possible. Here we provide mathematical support for this CFB concept under the assumption that the mean and variance for exchange complexity increase with radiation dose. ©2021 by Radiation Research Society. All rights of reproduction in any form reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019659      PMCID: PMC8440481          DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00253.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   3.372


  30 in total

1.  Simple chromosome exchanges are not linear with dose.

Authors:  A A Edwards; P A Hone; J E Moquet; D C Lloyd
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 2.  Analyzing radiation-induced complex chromosome rearrangements by combinatorial painting.

Authors:  M N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Complex chromosome exchanges induced by gamma rays in human lymphocytes: an mFISH study.

Authors:  B D Loucas; M N Cornforth
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  A molecular theory of cell survival.

Authors:  K H Chadwick; H P Leenhouts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Modification of the theory of dual radiation action for attenuated fields. II. Application to the analysis of soft X-ray results.

Authors:  D J Brenner; M Zaider
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.841

6.  Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Alvaro A Martinez; Gregory K Edmundson; Christina Mitchell; Howard D Thames; Elwood P Armour
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  The induction of chromosome exchange aberrations by carbon ultrasoft X-rays in V79 hamster cells.

Authors:  J Thacker; R E Wilkinson; D T Goodhead
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med       Date:  1986-04

8.  The linear-quadratic model is an appropriate methodology for determining isoeffective doses at large doses per fraction.

Authors:  David J Brenner
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.934

9.  Factors limiting the number of radiation-induced chromosome exchanges. I. Distance: evidence from non-interaction of x-ray- and neutron-induced breaks.

Authors:  S WOLFF; K C ATWOOD; M L RANDOLPH; H E LUIPPOLD
Journal:  J Biophys Biochem Cytol       Date:  1958-07-25

10.  Three-Color Chromosome Painting as Seen through the Eyes of mFISH: Another Look at Radiation-Induced Exchanges and Their Conversion to Whole-Genome Equivalency.

Authors:  Bradford D Loucas; Igor Shuryak; Michael N Cornforth
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.