Literature DB >> 34019216

The Effects of Word Identity, Case, and SOA on Word Priming in a Subliminal Context.

Hayden J Peel1, Kayla A Royals1, Philippe A Chouinard2.   

Abstract

It is widely assumed that subliminal word priming is case insensitive and that a short SOA (< 100 ms) is required to observe any effects. Here we attempted to replicate results from an influential study with the inclusion of a longer SOA to re-examine these assumptions. Participants performed a semantic categorisation task on visible word targets that were preceded either 64 or 192 ms by a subliminal prime. The prime and target were either the same or different word and could appear in the same or different case. We confirmed the presence of subliminal word priming (same word < different word reaction times). The word priming effect did not differ when case was the same or different, which supports case insensitive word priming. However, there was a general facilitation effect driven by case (same case < different case). Finally, there was a significant difference between the two SOA conditions; however, there were no interactions between SOA and any other factor, demonstrating that subliminal priming did not differ between short and long SOAs. The results demonstrate that word priming is case insensitive but that there is nevertheless an overall facilitation when words, regardless if they are repeated or not, are presented in the same case. This facilitation in case may reflect modularity in the low-level processing of the visual characteristics of words.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Subliminal priming; Visual masking; Word perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019216     DOI: 10.1007/s10936-021-09783-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  26 in total

1.  ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.

Authors:  S Bentin; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; M H Giard; J F Echallier; J Pernier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Unconscious processing of multiple nonadjacent letters in visually masked words.

Authors:  Richard L Abrams
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2005-09

Review 3.  The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.

Authors:  Manuel Carreiras; Blair C Armstrong; Manuel Perea; Ram Frost
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  A cognitive-anatomical approach to attention in lexical access.

Authors:  P E Compton; P Grossenbacher; M I Posner; D M Tucker
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Repetition suppression in occipital-temporal visual areas is modulated by physical rather than semantic features of objects.

Authors:  Philippe A Chouinard; Brendan F Morrissey; Stefan Köhler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The unique role of the visual word form area in reading.

Authors:  Stanislas Dehaene; Laurent Cohen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Subliminal syntactic priming.

Authors:  Lucie Berkovitch; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area.

Authors:  Laurent Cohen; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Subliminal understanding of negation: unconscious control by subliminal processing of word pairs.

Authors:  Anna-Marie Armstrong; Zoltan Dienes
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-08-07

10.  Power Analysis and Effect Size in Mixed Effects Models: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Michaël Stevens
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2018-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.