Literature DB >> 24373885

The what, when, where, and how of visual word recognition.

Manuel Carreiras1, Blair C Armstrong2, Manuel Perea3, Ram Frost4.   

Abstract

A long-standing debate in reading research is whether printed words are perceived in a feedforward manner on the basis of orthographic information, with other representations such as semantics and phonology activated subsequently, or whether the system is fully interactive and feedback from these representations shapes early visual word recognition. We review recent evidence from behavioral, functional magnetic resonance imaging, electroencephalography, magnetoencephalography, and biologically plausible connectionist modeling approaches, focusing on how each approach provides insight into the temporal flow of information in the lexical system. We conclude that, consistent with interactive accounts, higher-order linguistic representations modulate early orthographic processing. We also discuss how biologically plausible interactive frameworks and coordinated empirical and computational work can advance theories of visual word recognition and other domains (e.g., object recognition).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  computational modeling; feedback versus feedforward information; neural connectivity; orthographic processing; visual word form area; visual word recognition

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24373885     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  70 in total

1.  The time course of visual influences in letter recognition.

Authors:  Sylvain Madec; Kévin Le Goff; Stéphanie K Riès; Thierry Legou; Guillaume Rousselet; Pierre Courrieu; F-Xavier Alario; Jonathan Grainger; Arnaud Rey
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Lexical enhancement during prime-target integration: ERP evidence from matched-case identity priming.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Pablo Gómez; María Jiménez; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Effective connectivity of brain regions related to visual word recognition: An fMRI study of Chinese reading.

Authors:  Min Xu; Tianfu Wang; Siping Chen; Peter T Fox; Li Hai Tan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Tracking the time course of letter visual-similarity effects during word recognition: A masked priming ERP investigation.

Authors:  Eva Gutiérrez-Sigut; Ana Marcet; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Cross-linguistic transfer in bilinguals reading in two alphabetic orthographies: The grain size accommodation hypothesis.

Authors:  Marie Lallier; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

6.  Orthographic and phonological selectivity across the reading system in deaf skilled readers.

Authors:  Laurie S Glezer; Jill Weisberg; Cindy O'Grady Farnady; Stephen McCullough; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Converging evidence for functional and structural segregation within the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex in reading.

Authors:  Garikoitz Lerma-Usabiaga; Manuel Carreiras; Pedro M Paz-Alonso
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Domain generality versus modality specificity: the paradox of statistical learning.

Authors:  Ram Frost; Blair C Armstrong; Noam Siegelman; Morten H Christiansen
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 20.229

9.  Novel reading index for identifying disordered reading skill development: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Brianne Mohl; Noa Ofen; Lara L Jones; Joseph E Casey; Jeffrey A Stanley
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Child       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.