Literature DB >> 31317458

Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.

Moshim Kukar1, Kfir Ben-David2, June S Peng1, Kristopher Attwood3, Ryan M Thomas4,5, Mark Hennon6, Chukwumere Nwogu6, Steven N Hochwald7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive foregut surgery is increasingly performed for both benign and malignant diseases. We present a retrospective series of patients who underwent minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MIE) with linear stapled anastomosis performed at two centers in the USA, with a focus on evaluating leak and stricture rates.
METHODS: Patients treated from 2007 to 2018 were included, and data on demographics, oncologic treatment, pathology, and outcomes were analyzed. The surgical technique utilized laparoscopic and thoracoscopic access, with an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a 6-cm linear stapled side-to-side technique.
RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were included and 114 resections (91.9%) were completed in a minimally invasive fashion with a 6-cm linear stapled side-to-side anastomosis. Patients were predominantly male (90.7%) with a median age of 66.0 years and body mass index of 28.8 kg/m2. Of 121 patients with malignancy, negative margins were obtained in 94.3% and median lymph node yield was 15 (IQR 12-22). In the intention to treat analysis, median operative time was 463 min (IQR 403-515), blood loss was 150 mL (IQR 100-200), and length of stay was 8 days (IQR 7-11). Postoperative complications were experienced by 64 patients (51.6%) including respiratory failure in 14 (11.3%) and pneumonia in 12 (9.7%). In patients who successfully underwent a 6-cm stapled side-to-side anastomosis, anastomotic leaks occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) without need for operative intervention, and anastomotic strictures occurred in 6 patients (5.1%) requiring endoscopic management.
CONCLUSIONS: Ivor Lewis MIE with a 6-cm linear stapled anastomosis can be completed with a high technical success rate, and low rates of anastomotic leak and stricture.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Intrathoracic anastomosis; Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; Minimally invasive esophagectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31317458      PMCID: PMC9022892          DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04320-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  19 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Sheraz R Markar; Tienhan S Dabakuyo-Yonli; Bernard Meunier; Denis Pezet; Denis Collet; Xavier B D'Journo; Cécile Brigand; Thierry Perniceni; Nicolas Carrère; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Simon Msika; Frédérique Peschaud; Michel Prudhomme; Franck Bonnetain; Guillaume Piessen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Quality of Life after Open or Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy in Patients With Esophageal Cancer-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Rebecca M Schwartz; Wil Lieberman-Cribbin; Gil Moskowitz; Maaike van Gerwen; Raja Flores
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-24

7.  Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.

Authors:  Frans van Workum; Jolijn van der Maas; Frits J H van den Wildenberg; Fatih Polat; Ewout A Kouwenhoven; Marc J van Det; Grard A P Nieuwenhuijzen; Misha D Luyer; Camiel Rosman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Utilizing a Stapled Side-to-Side Anastomosis is Safe in the Western Patient Population.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; Rebecca Tuttle; Moshim Kukar; Georgios Rossidis; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Robot-assisted Minimally Invasive Thoracolaparoscopic Esophagectomy Versus Open Transthoracic Esophagectomy for Resectable Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Pieter C van der Sluis; Sylvia van der Horst; Anne M May; Carlo Schippers; Lodewijk A A Brosens; Hans C A Joore; Christiaan C Kroese; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Stella Mook; Frank P Vleggaar; Inne H M Borel Rinkes; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Minimally invasive intrathoracic anastomosis after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: a review of transoral or transthoracic use of staplers.

Authors:  K W Maas; S S A Y Biere; J J G Scheepers; S S Gisbertz; V Turrado Turrado Rodriguez; D L van der Peet; M A Cuesta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Robotic-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a review of the technique.

Authors:  Konstantinos Chouliaras; Steven Hochwald; Moshim Kukar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-05-20

2.  Technique for Robotic Transhiatal Esophagectomy.

Authors:  June S Peng; Moshim Kukar; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Comparison of Two Circular-Stapled Techniques for Esophageal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.

Authors:  Hang Lin; Ge'ao Liang; Huiping Chai; Yongde Liao; Chunfang Zhang; Yuanda Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Technical details for a robot-assisted hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis during minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  A Peri; N Furbetta; J Viganò; L Pugliese; G Di Franco; F S Latteri; N Mineo; F C Bruno; V Gallo; L Morelli; A Pietrabissa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effectiveness and safety of bovine pericardium patch repair for cervical anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Xionghuai Hua; Rulin Qian; Kefeng Shi; Xiufeng Wei; Heng Zhang; Ge Qu; Maolin Chen; Binbin Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.

Authors:  E Tagkalos; P C van der Sluis; E Uzun; F Berlth; J Staubitz; I Gockel; R van Hillegersberg; H Lang; Peter P Grimminger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Side-to-side esophagogastric anastomosis for minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: operative technique and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Manrica Fabbi; Stefano De Pascale; Filippo Ascari; Wanda Luisa Petz; Uberto Fumagalli Romario
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-04-26

8.  A safe and effective anastomotic technique for robot-assisted minimally invasive oesophagectomy: Reverse-puncture anastomosis.

Authors:  Hao Peng; Yi Yang Liu; Maimaitijiang Aimudula; Rong Chun Wang; Hao Chen; Xiaolong Liu; Haizhu Song; Jun Yi
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 2.483

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.