Literature DB >> 34013193

Evaluation of DNA damage in tobacco associated human buccal cells using comet assay.

Shanmugam Mohanapriya1, Thangadurai Maheswaran1, Nalliapan Ganapathy1, Thukanayakanpalayam Ragunathan Yoithapprabhunath1, Janardhanam Dineshshankar1, Vadivel Ilayaraja1, Rachel Sarah Vinodhini2, Renuga Devi2.   

Abstract

AIM AND
OBJECTIVE: To assess the DNA damage in tobacco associated human buccal cells using comet assay.
METHODS: The study included 75 study subjects, which were divided into 3 groups on the basis of tobacco usage. Group I - 25 individuals with no history of tobacco usage, Group II - 25 individuals with tobacco usage but without oral lesions and Group III - 25 individuals with tobacco associated oral lesions. Cytological smears collected from these individuals were used to assess the tobacco associated DNA damage by measuring the tail length in the comet assay method.
RESULTS: The average tail length was found to be 1.46 μm in the normal mucosa, 2.86 μm in tobacco users without oral lesions, 3.86 μm in the lesional sites of tobacco users and 3.67 μm in the non-lesional sites of these individuals. Factors like age, gender, duration and different forms of tobacco habit had their own impact on the oral mucosa.
CONCLUSION: Comet assay helps assess the subclinical genetic changes of oral mucosa even before the clinical manifestations of the precancerous lesions appeared due to tobacco usage. Thus, comet assay may bloom out as a novel adjuvant tool for the prevention of oral cancer in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; comet assay; tobacco

Year:  2021        PMID: 34013193      PMCID: PMC8118208          DOI: 10.15386/mpr-1692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pharm Rep        ISSN: 2602-0807


Introduction

Globally, the use of tobacco continues to be the leading preventable cause of death [1]. The burden of disease and death that tobacco imposes on public health is extensive [2]. Diagnosis of potentially malignant disorders prevents the occurrence of oral cancer but also helps in improving the survival of those who develop it [3]. Deoxyribonucleic acid is one of the key victims of many carcinogens. Since buccal epithelial cells have direct contact with the carcinogens during the tobacco usage, the identification of DNA damage in these cells would be useful and appropriate [4]. Very few published reports are available in the literature regarding the use of comet assay in the buccal epithelial cells and no studies were reported to compare the DNA damage using comet assay between the lesional and the non-lesional sites of tobacco users.

Methods

Study population was carefully selected and clinical data sheets were used to elicit the history and to record the details of age, gender, duration, frequency and forms of tobacco usage from each study participant. The sampling method and the importance of the study were explained in detail to the subjects. The study samples were collected from the volunteers after obtaining their informed consent. Institutional Ethical Committee approval was obtained with the reference number VDCW/IEC/09/2015 on 14.12.2015. The study group included: Group I - 25 individuals with no history of tobacco usage. Group II - 25 individuals with tobacco usage but without oral lesions. Group III - 25 individuals with tobacco associated oral lesions. In Group I and Group II, buccal smear was taken from one side of the oral mucosa, whereas in Group III two sets of smears were taken. The buccal smear from the lesional site of the individual with tobacco-associated oral lesion was labeled as Group III-a, whereas the buccal smear from the non lesional site of the individual with tobacco associated lesion was labeled as Group III-b. Samples were obtained by scrapping the cells from the buccal mucosa using a small blunt wooden stick. The samples were then stirred in the phosphate buffered saline contained in Eppendorf Tubes and placed in the refrigerator at 4°C until processing. The samples were then centrifuged (REMI Laboratory 8C Centrifuge, India) at 3500 rpm for 5 minutes to get a cell suspension. The frosted slides used for placing the samples were wiped with alcohol to make the surface dust free and placed in the incubator (Thermo-fisher scientific incubator, U.S.) at 37°C for 30 minutes. The slides were pre-coated with normal melting point agarose (A9639-Sigma Aldrich, United States). The slides were then placed in the room temperature for 15–20 minutes until a clear homogenous layer was seen [5]. The sample was prepared with the low melting point agarose (RM861-HI MEDIA, India). Low melting point agarose was prepared by dissolving 0.5 grams of agarose in 12.5 ml of phosphate buffered saline. The mixture was placed in the boiling water and allowed to cool for 15–20 minutes. 85 μl of the low melting point agarose was then mixed with 10μl of the sample using the micropipette in a plastic tube. The suspension was then mixed using mechanical vibrator. From this suspension, 10μl of the sample was placed on the slide and covered with a coverslip. The slides were then placed in the refrigerator at 4°C for solidification. After 3–4 minutes of solidification of the agar, the coverslip was lifted up and removed from the slides [5]. After the solidification of the sample, slides were gently placed in the lysis buffer for 1 hr at 4 degree Celsius in a refrigerator. After lysis, the next step was pre-electrophoresis to allow the unwinding of DNA. The slides were placed in the electrophoresis alkaline solution for about 30 minutes [5]. The slides were then removed from the lysing solution and placed in a horizontal electrophoresis system (BIORAD-ELECTROPHORESIS SYSTEM, Sub gel GT with power pack- HERCULES, CALIFORNIA,) near the anode end, sliding them as closely as possible. Next for the pre-electrophoresis process, the slides were left undisturbed in the electrophoresis tank without switching on the power supply for about 20 minutes. Electrophoresis is one of the important steps in comet assay. During the electrophoresis, broken DNA fragments tend to migrate towards anode. The shorter DNA fragments travel the farthest. After pre-electrophoresis, electrodes were connected to the power-pack unit. At constant current, voltage of 24 volt and 300 mA was set for 15 minutes. The slides were then coated drop wise with neutralization buffer and left for 10 minutes. After neutralizing the pH, the slides were drained and staining with ethidium bromide (Sigma-Aldrich, United States), a fluorescent dye was done by adding 50 μl of the working solution of ethidium bromide to the slides. The excess staining liquid was blotted off [5]. The slides were then visualized using Olympus CX 31 fluorescence microscope, Japan with Binocular 30° inclined and rotatable 360° at 400X magnification and the fluorescent image was captured using Jenoptik ProgRes SpeedXT Core 3 CCD Microscope Camera – Germany. The captured image was then measured using the ProgRes® Capture Pro 2.8.8 Jenoptik software. After capturing the image, cells with well stained nuclei were included for counting. Cells with irregular staining, artifacts and unclear images were excluded. A total of 25 cells per sample were taken for counting. After calibrating the software, the length and the diameter of the nucleus was measured using the line tool and recorded in the Microsoft excel sheet. The tail length was obtained by subtracting the diameter from the total length of the nucleus. The mean tail length of the group was assessed from the values of 25 individuals. All the demographic data like age, sex, history and the duration of tobacco usage with average tail length were tabulated to assess the mean tail length. Statistical significance was assessed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 17. The mean tail length of the non-smokers, smokers without lesion and tobacco associated lesions was analyzed using the ANOVA (Analysis of variance) test. The level of significance (P<0.05) was employed in all statistical comparisons. The difference between various groups was confirmed by the Post-Hoc test. The student t test was used to compare the mean tail length between each group. The average tail length was also compared with age, gender, history of tobacco usage and the type of lesion for any possible statistically significant association.

Results

Comet assay was done to assess the DNA damage for the three groups of individuals; each group had 25 study participants. Out of the 75 individuals participating in this study, 31 were females and 44 were males. Compared to the average tail length and the type of lesion, leukoplakia have much higher value of tail length than the other tobacco associated lesions in Group III-a. Compared to the average tail length and the type of lesion, leukoplakia has relatively higher tail length than the other tobacco associated lesions in Group III-b, which is statistically significant. When we compared the average tail length with the forms of tobacco usage in the individuals belonging to Group II, the average tail length of betel quid users and cigarette users have much higher value than the other forms of tobacco in Group II.

Discussion

Tobacco is one of the important etiological agents for various forms of diseases. The usage of tobacco leads to an array of oral lesions that have more potential for malignant transformation [6]. Non-lethal DNA damage is the heart of carcinogenesis and occurs due to environmental exposure of various agents in the body. The failure of DNA repair enzyme to control the DNA damage results in the uncontrolled proliferation and decreased apoptosis [7]. Most of the oral cancers are associated with exposure of tobacco and is usually preceded by visible clinical changes called precancerous lesions or potentially malignant disorders. Since there is limited information about the status of DNA damage in clinically normal buccal mucosa of tobacco users, this study was done with the objective of comparing the DNA damage between the lesional and non-lesional buccal cells of tobacco users with comet assay. The results of our study emphasize that even in the absence of the tobacco habit every individual undergo some sort of DNA damage (Table I). This minimal level of DNA damage may be due to the various factors like environmental, occupational and age related factors [8]. The environmental conditions play a role in the accumulation of DNA damage. Similar studies also revealed that the age and environmental conditions contribute a great deal in setting a higher degree of basal DNA damage [9].
Figure 1

ProgRes Image analysis.

Figure 2

The microscopy of Group I in ethidium bromide staining in 40x magnification.

Figure 3

Microscopic view of Group I at 40x magnification.

Figure 4

Microscopic fluorescent image of Group III in the lesional and the non-lesional site.

Table I

Comparison of the average tail length and standard deviation.

GroupNAverage Tail length (μm)ANOVAp
MeanSD
Group I251.460.35148.98< 0.001**
Group II252.160.37
Group IIIa253.860.57
Group IIIb253.670.57
Total1002.791.12
An in vivo autofluoroscence spectroscopic study was done in smokers and the non-smokers in the lymphocytes using comet assay. They also found that mean tail length of the smokers is considerably higher than that of the non-smokers (Table II) [10].
Table II

The comparison of differences between average tail lengths between various groups.

GroupNMeanSDtp

Average Tail length (μm)Group I251.460.356.92< 0.001**
Group II252.160.37

Average Tail length (μm)Group II252.160.3712.41< 0.001**

Group IIIa253.860.57

Average Tail length (μm)Group II252.160.3711.09< 0.001**
Group IIIb253.670.57

Average Tail length (μm)Group IIIa253.860.571.120.268

Group IIIb253.670.57
The mean tail length was significantly higher in Group-III when compared to Group II, this may be attributed to difference in duration of the habit, genetic predisposition or the role of nutrition like anti-oxidant that may protect the tobacco users from DNA damage. In comparing the lesional and the non-lesional sites of the individuals in Group III we did not find a large difference (Table II). This depicts the concept that subclinical changes are found in the clinically normal mucosa of the lesional patient before it changes to a pre-cancerous lesion. In comparing the DNA damage in the lymphocytes of the oral precancerous and cancerous patients, it was concluded that the mean tail length of leukoplakia was more than that of oral submucous fibrosis; oral cancer patients had much more increased tail length than the other two lesions [11]. It was found in a study that by assessing the DNA damage of the different staging of squamous cell carcinoma, the mean DNA damage of 30 controls were 0.8616 μm, whereas in our study it was 1.46μm. They have compared the various grades of squamous cell carcinoma and the mean DNA damage was 3.874 μm which was similar to results of our study in tobacco associated oral lesions of 3.86 μm [5]. The comet assay was done in the affected gingival epithelial cells of oral submucous fibrosis patients and it was concluded that the mean DNA damage of the lesional site was 4.7 μm, where as in our study it was 3.86 μm. Just as in their study, in our study similar DNA damage of 1.49 μm was found in the control group [12]. A stepwise increase in DNA damage was found in different grades of dysplasia ranging from 0.31 μm to 1.25 μm in leukoplakia patients. The similar increase in DNA damage was evaluated in our study ranging from 1.46 μm to 3.86 μm in normal and lesional patients [13]. When we compared the tail length between various tobacco associated lesions, leukoplakia patients were found to have more DNA damage than the patients with other tobacco associated lesions such as squamous cell carcinoma, tobacco pouch keratosis and smokers palate (Table III and IV). The review on the effect of tobacco on oral health emphasizes the concept that leukoplakia has more tendencies for malignant transformation than the other lesions like smokers’ palate or tobacco pouch keratosis. A similar study which was done to compare the genetic damage in precancerous and cancerous patients, found leukoplakia to have relatively higher tail length than oral squamous cell carcinoma [14].
Table III

Average tail length with the type of lesion in Group III-a (lesional site).

Group IIIaNAverage Tail length (μm)ANOVAp
Type of the lesionMeanSD
Leukoplakia84.220.524.690.012*
Smokers palate74.050.43
Squamous cell carcinoma23.350.49
Tobacco pouch keratosis83.450.46
Total253.860.57
Table IV

The variation in average tail length with the type of lesion in Group III-b (non- lesional site).

Group IIIbNAverage Tail length (μm)ANOVAp
Type of the lesionMeanSD
Leukoplakia84.020.545.070.008**
Smokers palate73.900.46
Squamous cell carcinoma23.070.06
Tobacco pouch keratosis83.280.42
Total253.670.57
In correlating the forms of tobacco usage with the average tail length in Group-II, Betel quid users have much higher tail length than the other forms of tobacco usage (Table V). Naveen Kumar et al., found cigarette smoking to have much harmful effect than the other forms of tobacco usage [15]. In the study conducted among 300 individuals of various tobacco users Pan masala and Gutkha usage have more effect than smoking [16].
Table V

Forms of tobacco usage and average tail length in Group-II.

Group IINAverage Tail length (μm)ANOVAp
Forms of tobaccoMeanSD
Betel quid62.250.440.670.582
Bidi62.210.30
Cigarette52.240.48
Pan82.010.31
Total252.160.37
Nicotine addiction with usage of tobacco causes continual cigarette smoking and chronic exposure to carcinogens. The carcinogens can be metabolically activated to intermediates that react with DNA, forming DNA adducts. The metabolic detoxification of carcinogens leads to harmless excreted products. If the DNA adducts are repaired by cellular repair enzymes, DNA is returned to its normal undamaged state. But if the adducts persist during DNA replication, miscoding can occur, which leads to a permanent mutation in the DNA sequence. Cells with damaged or mutated DNA can be removed by apoptosis. If the mutations occur in particular regions of crucial genes, such as the RAS or MYC oncogenes or TP53 or CDKN2A tumor-suppressor genes, the result can be the loss of normal cellular growth-control regulation and tumor development. There will be increased angiogenesis and cellular development that leads to the progression of cancer [17]. The comet assay assesses a specific form of DNA damage - double strand and single strand breaks. Although, this study indicates that smokers may have more DNA breakage, we need to remember that this mere association does not prove causality. Previous studies investigating the mutation signature in various smoking related cancers particularly in tissues with direct exposure implicate point mutations particularly C>A transversions as the main mutation signature and not necessarily DNA breaks [18]. The field of genetically altered cells in patients with squamous cell carcinoma called “field cancerization,” has been documented with numerous clinical, histopathological and molecular studies. Therefore, the patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are subject to the risk of developing local recurrences or second primary tumors as a consequence of the field cancerization, which is considered to be a bad prognostic sign. So it is important to evaluate the clinically normal mucosa of the lesional patients [19].

Conclusion

Early diagnosis and assessment of potentially malignant lesions will help prevent the malignancy at a much earlier stage. Many advanced molecular techniques are available to detect and assess these conditions. One such technique is the comet assay that can identify, assess and predict the prognosis of the subclinical genetic changes of oral mucosa even before the clinical manifestations of the potentially malignant lesions are visible. This potential noninvasive test can be used for convincing the individuals to quit tobacco usage even before the appearance of visible clinical changes. Therefore comet assay may bloom out as a novel tool for the prevention of oral cancer in the nearby future.
  17 in total

Review 1.  The comet assay as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors.

Authors:  P Møller; L E Knudsen; S Loft; H Wallin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  In Vivo Autofluorescence Spectroscopic Study and Evaluation of DNA Damage By Comet Assay in Smokers.

Authors:  M Rajmohan; R Murali Naidu; D Thamaraiselvi; Deepasree M
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  Assessing extent of single stranded DNA damage in oral mucosal cells of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma and its correlation with TNM staging.

Authors:  S S Bhagwath; L Chandra
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct

Review 4.  Potentially Malignant Oral Disorders and Cancer Transformation.

Authors:  Divya Ganesh; Prathima Sreenivasan; Jenny Öhman; Mats Wallström; Paulo Henrique Braz-Silva; Daniel Giglio; Göran Kjeller; Bengt Hasséus
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 5.  Tobacco carcinogens, their biomarkers and tobacco-induced cancer.

Authors:  Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 60.716

6.  Comparative evaluation of genotoxicity by micronucleus assay in the buccal mucosa over comet assay in peripheral blood in oral precancer and cancer patients.

Authors:  Atul Katarkar; Sanjit Mukherjee; Masood H Khan; Jay G Ray; Keya Chaudhuri
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2014-07-22       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 7.  Comet assay: an essential tool in toxicological research.

Authors:  M Glei; T Schneider; W Schlörmann
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 8.  The impact and relevance of tobacco control research in low-and middle-income countries globally and to the US.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Geoffrey T Fong; James F Thrasher; Joanna E Cohen; Wasim Maziak; Harry Lando; Jeffrey Drope; Raul Mejia; Joaquin Barnoya; Rima Nakkash; Ramzi G Salloum; Mark Parascandola
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 3.913

9.  Mutational signatures associated with tobacco smoking in human cancer.

Authors:  Ludmil B Alexandrov; Young Seok Ju; Kerstin Haase; Peter Van Loo; Iñigo Martincorena; Serena Nik-Zainal; Yasushi Totoki; Akihiro Fujimoto; Hidewaki Nakagawa; Tatsuhiro Shibata; Peter J Campbell; Paolo Vineis; David H Phillips; Michael R Stratton
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Genomic insights into head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Tim N Beck; Erica A Golemis
Journal:  Cancers Head Neck       Date:  2016-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.