Literature DB >> 11045781

The comet assay as a rapid test in biomonitoring occupational exposure to DNA-damaging agents and effect of confounding factors.

P Møller1, L E Knudsen, S Loft, H Wallin.   

Abstract

Within the last decade, the comet assay has been used with increasing popularity to investigate the level of DNA damage in terms of strand breaks and alkaline labile sites in biomonitoring studies. The assay is easily performed on WBCs and has been included in a wide range of biomonitoring studies of occupational exposures encompassing styrene, vinyl chloride, 1,3-butadiene, pesticides, hair dyes, antineoplastic agents, organic solvents, sewage and waste materials, wood dust, and ionizing radiation. Eleven of the occupational studies were positive, whereas seven were negative. Notably, the negative studies appeared to have less power than the positive studies. Also, there were poor dose-response relationships in many of the biomonitoring studies. Many factors have been reported to produce effects by the comet assay, e.g., age, air pollution exposure, diet, exercise, gender, infection, residential radon exposure, smoking, and season. Until now, the use of the comet assay has been hampered by the uncertainty of the influence of confounding factors. We argue that none of the confounding factors are unequivocally positive in the majority of the studies. We recommend that age, gender, and smoking status be used as criteria for the selection of populations and that data on exercise, diet, and recent infections be registered before blood sampling. Samples from exposed and unexposed populations should be collected at the same time to avoid seasonal variation. In general, the comet assay is considered a suitable and fast test for DNA-damaging potential in biomonitoring studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11045781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  51 in total

1.  Urine mutagenicity and lymphocyte DNA damage in fruit growers occupationally exposed to the fungicide captan.

Authors:  P Lebailly; A Devaux; D Pottier; M De Meo; V Andre; I Baldi; F Severin; J Bernaud; B Durand; M Henry-Amar; P Gauduchon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Environmental and biological monitoring of occupational formaldehyde exposure resulting from the use of products for hair straightening.

Authors:  Giovana Piva Peteffi; Marina Venzon Antunes; Caroline Carrer; Eduarda Trevizani Valandro; Sílvia Santos; Jéssica Glaeser; Larissa Mattos; Luciano Basso da Silva; Rafael Linden
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Biomarkers to assess the utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Neal L Benowitz; Stephen I Rennard; Cheryl Oncken; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.244

4.  Antioxidant activities of α-lipoic acid free and nano-capsule inhibit the growth of Ehrlich carcinoma.

Authors:  Monira M Rageh; Reem H El-Gebaly
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Cytogenetic biomonitoring of oral mucosa cells from adults exposed to dental X-rays.

Authors:  Daniel A Ribeiro; Fernanda Angelieri
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-08-03

6.  Prevalence of chromosomal aberrations in Argentinean agricultural workers.

Authors:  Graciela Eugenia Bianco; Eva Suarez; Lauro Cazon; Teresita Beatriz de la Puente; Marcelo Rafael Benitez Ahrendts; Julio César De Luca
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Applicability of the comet assay in evaluation of DNA damage in healthcare providers' working with antineoplastic drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammad Javad Zare Sakhvidi; Mohammad Hajaghazadeh; Mehrdad Mostaghaci; Amir Houshang Mehrparvar; Fariba Zare Sakhvidi; Elham Naghshineh
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-04-25

8.  Evaluating chromosomal damage in workers exposed to hexavalent chromium and the modulating role of polymorphisms of DNA repair genes.

Authors:  Erika Halasova; Tatiana Matakova; Ludovit Musak; Veronika Polakova; Lucia Letkova; Dusan Dobrota; Pavel Vodicka
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Petrol exposure and DNA integrity of peripheral lymphocytes.

Authors:  R N Naidoo; M H Makwela; A Chuturgoon; C Tiloke; P Ramkaran; A Phulukdaree
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Is organic farming safer to farmers' health? A comparison between organic and traditional farming.

Authors:  Carla Costa; Julia García-Lestón; Solange Costa; Patrícia Coelho; Susana Silva; Marta Pingarilho; Vanessa Valdiglesias; Francesca Mattei; Valentina Dall'Armi; Stefano Bonassi; Blanca Laffon; John Snawder; João Paulo Teixeira
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 4.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.