Literature DB >> 34010224

Epidemiology and causes of cardiogenic shock.

David D Berg1, Erin A Bohula, David A Morrow.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiogenic shock is a complex clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion due to impaired cardiac performance. Although cardiogenic shock has traditionally been viewed as a monolithic disorder predominantly caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is increasing recognition of the diverse causes of cardiogenic shock and wide spectrum of clinical severity. The purpose of this review is to describe the contemporary epidemiology of cardiogenic shock, including trends in clinical outcomes and recent efforts to refine risk assessment. RECENT
FINDINGS: The incidence of cardiogenic shock among patients with AMI has remained remarkably stable at 3-10%; however, the proportion of cardiogenic shock cases related to AMI has decreased over time to ∼30%, while the proportion of cardiogenic shock cases due to acute decompensated heart failure has steadily increased. Estimated in-hospital mortality from cardiogenic shock in contemporary registries is approximately 30-40%, suggesting modest improvement in cardiogenic shock outcomes over the last decade. There is a wide spectrum of clinical severity among patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, which is described by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions clinical staging criteria.
SUMMARY: Improved clinical characterization and risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock may facilitate more effective clinical investigations of this morbid clinical syndrome.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34010224     DOI: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care        ISSN: 1070-5295            Impact factor:   3.687


  5 in total

1.  De Novo vs Acute-on-Chronic Presentations of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Registry.

Authors:  Ankeet S Bhatt; David D Berg; Erin A Bohula; Carlos L Alviar; Vivian M Baird-Zars; Christopher F Barnett; James A Burke; Anthony P Carnicelli; Sunit-Preet Chaudhry; Lori B Daniels; James C Fang; Christopher B Fordyce; Daniel A Gerber; Jianping Guo; Jacob C Jentzer; Jason N Katz; Norma Keller; Michael C Kontos; Patrick R Lawler; Venu Menon; Thomas S Metkus; Jose Nativi-Nicolau; Nicholas Phreaner; Robert O Roswell; Shashank S Sinha; R Jeffrey Snell; Michael A Solomon; Sean Van Diepen; David A Morrow
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 6.592

Review 2.  Inotropic support in cardiogenic shock: who leads the battle, milrinone or dobutamine?

Authors:  Ivan David Lozada Martinez; Andrea Juliana Bayona-Gamboa; Duvier Fabián Meza-Fandiño; Omar Andrés Paz-Echeverry; Ángela María Ávila-Bonilla; Mario Javier Paz-Echeverry; Frank Jaider Pineda-Trujillo; Gina Paola Rodríguez-García; Jaime Enrique Covaleda-Vargas; Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-09-22

3.  Plasma Quantitative Lipid Profiles: Identification of CarnitineC18:1-OH, CarnitineC18:2-OH and FFA (20:1) as Novel Biomarkers for Pre-warning and Prognosis in Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Liangqiu Tang; Qiqi Lu; Yi Yu; Qiu-Gui Xu; Shanqiang Zhang; Yun-Xian Chen; Wen-Jie Dai; Ji-Cheng Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

4.  Comparison of the Efficacy of ECMO With or Without IABP in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Chaojun Yang; Jing Chen; Zhixing Fan; Wanyin Cai; Yifan Huang; Zujin Xiang; Jun Yang; Jing Zhang; Jian Yang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-07

Review 5.  Evolving Presentation of Cardiogenic Shock: A Review of the Medical Literature and Current Practices.

Authors:  Neal Olarte; Nina Thakkar Rivera; Luanda Grazette
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2022-08-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.