| Literature DB >> 36268289 |
Ivan David Lozada Martinez1,2, Andrea Juliana Bayona-Gamboa3, Duvier Fabián Meza-Fandiño4, Omar Andrés Paz-Echeverry5, Ángela María Ávila-Bonilla6, Mario Javier Paz-Echeverry5, Frank Jaider Pineda-Trujillo7, Gina Paola Rodríguez-García6, Jaime Enrique Covaleda-Vargas8, Alexis Rafael Narvaez-Rojas9.
Abstract
Cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death globally, with acute myocardial infarction being one of the most frequent. One of the complications that can occur after a myocardial infarction is cardiogenic shock. At present, the evidence on the use of inotropic agents for the management of this complication is scarce, and only a few trials have evaluated the efficacy-adverse effects relationship of some agents. Milrinone and Dobutamine are some of the most frequently mentioned drugs that have been studied recently. However, there are still no data that affirm with certainty the supremacy of one over the other. The aim of this review is to synthesize evidence on basic and practical aspects of these agents, allowing us to conclude which might be more useful in current clinical practice, based on the emerging literature.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiogenic shock; Cardiovascular diseases; Dobutamine; Milrinone; Myocardial infarction
Year: 2022 PMID: 36268289 PMCID: PMC9577832 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) ISSN: 2049-0801