Literature DB >> 34009474

Hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication for the treatment of borderline dysplasia: a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Federico Della Rocca1, Vincenzo Di Francia1, Paolo Schiavi2, Riccardo D'Ambrosi3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients treated arthroscopically for symptomatic borderline dysplasia of the hip (BHD) with a T-shaped capsular plication, with a minimum follow-up of 24 months.
METHODS: Twenty-seven patients who had undergone hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication for symptomatic BHD were included in the study. All patients were clinically evaluated prior to surgery (T0) and at two consecutive follow-ups (T1: 12 ± 1.2 months; T2: 52.0 ± 23.2 months) using the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, the Hip Outcome Score in activities of daily living (HOS-ADL) and sport-specific subscale (HOS-SSS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form-12 in its physical (PCS) and mental component scores (MCS). We also evaluated the presence of correlations and analysed the possible differences between subgroups.
RESULTS: We found a significant difference for HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, VAS and WOMAC with the Friedman test for repeated measures through time points (p < 0.0001), but not for MCS. All clinical scores reported a significant improvement compared to the previous time point (p < 0.05), with the exception of HOS-SSS, for which p = 0.2570 between T1 and T2. The body mass index was positively correlated with preoperative VAS (R = 0.42857; p = 0.0257) and negatively correlated with PCS at T0 (R = - 0.40999; p = 0.0337) and with PCS (R = - 0.40491; p = 0.0362), MCS (R = - 0.45939; p = 0.0159) and WOMAC (R = - 0.40573; p = 0.0216) at T2. No complications were reported in our cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study confirm that patients with intra-articular hip pathology and concomitant BHD (LCEA 20°-25°) can benefit from arthroscopic treatment and that T-shaped capsular plication is one of the available options. Orthopaedic surgeons specialising in hip arthroscopy should consider arthroscopy for the treatment of symptomatic BHD for stabilising and strengthening the joint. Future studies should focus on finding out which type of patients can benefit most from this procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: Prospective Case Series.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borderline dysplasia of the hip; Capsuloplasty; Hip arthroscopy; Microinstability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34009474     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02997-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

1.  Subjective health status assessment: evaluation of the Italian version of the SF-12 Health Survey. Results from the MiOS Project.

Authors:  G Kodraliu; P Mosconi; N Groth; G Carmosino; A Perilli; E A Gianicolo; C Rossi; G Apolone
Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat       Date:  2001

2.  Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy.

Authors:  RobRoy L Martin; Marc J Philippon
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 3.  Microinstability of the hip: A review.

Authors:  A Dangin; N Tardy; M Wettstein; O May; N Bonin
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.256

4.  Classifications in Brief: Tönnis Classification of Hip Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Boris Kovalenko; Prashoban Bremjit; Navin Fernando
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Capsulotomy Size Affects Hip Joint Kinematic Stability.

Authors:  Thomas H Wuerz; Sang H Song; Jeffrey S Grzybowski; Hal D Martin; Richard C Mather; Michael J Salata; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Successful return to sport in patients with symptomatic borderline dysplasia following hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Michael Elias Hantes; Ilaria Mariani; Vincenzo Paolo Di Francia; Federico Della Rocca
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 7.  How to analyze the Visual Analogue Scale: Myths, truths and clinical relevance.

Authors:  Gillian Z Heller; Maurizio Manuguerra; Roberta Chow
Journal:  Scand J Pain       Date:  2016-07-27

Review 8.  A Contemporary Definition of Hip Dysplasia and Structural Instability: Toward a Comprehensive Classification for Acetabular Dysplasia.

Authors:  Geoffrey P Wilkin; Mazen M Ibrahim; Kevin M Smit; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  Maria Klässbo; Eva Larsson; Eva Mannevik
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 10.  International trends in arthroscopic hip preservation surgery-are we treating the same patient?

Authors:  Brandon J Erickson; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Rachel M Frank; Sanjeev Bhatia; Charles A Bush-Joseph; Shane J Nho; Joshua D Harris
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-02-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.