Thomas H Wuerz1, Sang H Song2, Jeffrey S Grzybowski2, Hal D Martin3, Richard C Mather4, Michael J Salata5, Alejandro A Espinoza Orías2, Shane J Nho6. 1. Center for Hip Preservation, Division of Sports Medicine, New England Baptist Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A. 2. Hip Preservation Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Rush Medical College of Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. 3. Hip Preservation Center, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, U.S.A. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A. 6. Hip Preservation Center, Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Rush Medical College of Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.. Electronic address: Shane.nho@rushortho.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of capsulotomy size and subsequent repair on the biomechanical stability of hip joint kinematics through external rotation of a cadaveric hip in neutral flexion. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hip specimens were used in this study. Each hip was tested under torsional loads of 6 N·m applied by a servohydraulic frame and transmitted by a pulley system. The test conditions were (1) neutral flexion with the capsule intact, (2) neutral flexion with a 4-cm interportal capsulotomy, (3) neutral flexion with a 6-cm capsulotomy, and (4) neutral flexion with capsulotomy repair. Soft tissue was retained during all interventions. Measures indicating joint kinematics (range of motion [ROM], hysteresis area [HA], and neutral zone [NZ]) were obtained for each condition. RESULTS: For all hip specimens, the average ROM, HA, and NZ were calculated relative to the intact capsular state (100%) and expressed in terms of percentage (± SD). The findings for ROM were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 107.42% ± 5.69%; 6 cm, 113.40% ± 7.92%; and repair, 99.78% ± 3.77%. The findings for HA were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 108.30% ± 9.30%; 6 cm, 115.30% ± 13.92%; and repair, 99.47% ± 4.12%. The findings for NZ were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 139.61% ± 62.35%; 6 cm, 169.25% ± 78.19%; and repair, 132.03% ± 64.38%. Statistically significant differences in ROM existed between the intact and 4-cm conditions (P = .039), the intact and 6-cm conditions (P < .0001), the 4-cm and repair conditions (P = .033), and the 6-cm and repair conditions (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the intact and repair conditions (P > .99) or between the 4- and 6-cm conditions (P = .126). CONCLUSIONS: Under laboratory-based conditions, larger-sized capsulotomies were accompanied by increases in all 3 measures of joint mobility: ROM, HA, and NZ at time zero. Complete capsular closure effectively restored these measures when compared with the intact condition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cadaveric models consisting of the hip joint with surrounding soft tissue were used under laboratory testing conditions to investigate potential iatrogenic joint instability resulting from expansive capsulotomies, showing that complete capsular closure leads to reconstitution of original joint stability properties at time zero.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of capsulotomy size and subsequent repair on the biomechanical stability of hip joint kinematics through external rotation of a cadaveric hip in neutral flexion. METHODS: Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric hip specimens were used in this study. Each hip was tested under torsional loads of 6 N·m applied by a servohydraulic frame and transmitted by a pulley system. The test conditions were (1) neutral flexion with the capsule intact, (2) neutral flexion with a 4-cm interportal capsulotomy, (3) neutral flexion with a 6-cm capsulotomy, and (4) neutral flexion with capsulotomy repair. Soft tissue was retained during all interventions. Measures indicating joint kinematics (range of motion [ROM], hysteresis area [HA], and neutral zone [NZ]) were obtained for each condition. RESULTS: For all hip specimens, the average ROM, HA, and NZ were calculated relative to the intact capsular state (100%) and expressed in terms of percentage (± SD). The findings for ROM were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 107.42% ± 5.69%; 6 cm, 113.40% ± 7.92%; and repair, 99.78% ± 3.77%. The findings for HA were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 108.30% ± 9.30%; 6 cm, 115.30% ± 13.92%; and repair, 99.47% ± 4.12%. The findings for NZ were as follows: intact, 100%; 4 cm, 139.61% ± 62.35%; 6 cm, 169.25% ± 78.19%; and repair, 132.03% ± 64.38%. Statistically significant differences in ROM existed between the intact and 4-cm conditions (P = .039), the intact and 6-cm conditions (P < .0001), the 4-cm and repair conditions (P = .033), and the 6-cm and repair conditions (P < .0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the intact and repair conditions (P > .99) or between the 4- and 6-cm conditions (P = .126). CONCLUSIONS: Under laboratory-based conditions, larger-sized capsulotomies were accompanied by increases in all 3 measures of joint mobility: ROM, HA, and NZ at time zero. Complete capsular closure effectively restored these measures when compared with the intact condition. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cadaveric models consisting of the hip joint with surrounding soft tissue were used under laboratory testing conditions to investigate potential iatrogenic joint instability resulting from expansive capsulotomies, showing that complete capsular closure leads to reconstitution of original joint stability properties at time zero.
Authors: Rebecca M Woodward; Renuka M Vesey; Catherine J Bacon; Steve G White; Matthew J Brick; Donna G Blankenbaker Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Olufemi R Ayeni; Christopher M Larson; Nicolas Bonin; Marc R Safran Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2016-08-20 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Kelly M Tomasevich; Megan K Mills; Hailey Allen; Amanda M Crawford; Alexander J Mortensen; Angela P Presson; Chong Zhang; Stephen K Aoki Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2021-12-27
Authors: Christian Dippmann; Otto Kraemer; Bent Lund; Michael Krogsgaard; Per Hölmich; Martin Lind; Karen Briggs; Marc Philippon; Bjarne Mygind-Klavsen Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jonathan D Packer; James B Cowan; Brian J Rebolledo; Kotaro R Shibata; Geoffrey M Riley; Andrea K Finlay; Marc R Safran Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2018-11-12
Authors: K C Geoffrey Ng; Hadi El Daou; Marcus J K Bankes; Ferdinando Rodriguez Y Baena; Jonathan R T Jeffers Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2018-12-31 Impact factor: 6.202