Rachel Lenko1, Terri Voepel-Lewis1,2. 1. University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 2. Department of Anesthesiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Analgesic trade-off preferences, or the relative preference for pain relief vs. risk aversion, shape parents' decisions to give prescription opioids to their children. These preferences may be influenced by personal experiences and societal factors. AIM: To examine whether parental analgesic trade-off preferences and opioid decision-making have shifted toward risk aversion during the opioid crisis in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the preoperative survey data of parents from a single U.S. pediatric hospital whose children aged 5-17 years were to undergo painful surgery in 2013 (Time 1) or 2017/2019 (Time 2). Surveys assessed parents' analgesic trade-off preference (-12 or risk-averse to +12 or pain relief preferent, scores around 0=ambivalent) and their hypothetical decisions to give a prescribed opioid to a child in pain. RESULTS: Data from 847 parents were included (Time 1, n = 361; Time 2, n = 486). Parents at Time 2 were significantly more risk-averse compared with Time 1 (adj.β: -0.84 [95% CI: -1.09, -0.60]). Parents at Time 2 were more than twice as likely to be risk-averse or ambivalent (OR: 2.17 [95% CI: 1.62, 2.91]). There was a significant interaction effect of Time*Preference on parents' decision to give the opioid (adj. OR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.16]). At Time 2, parents who were ambivalent or risk-averse were less likely than those who preferred to relieve pain to administer the prescribed opioid (OR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.89]). In contrast, there was no association between the preference group and the opioid decision at Time 1. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that parents of children scheduled for painful surgery at our pediatric hospital have become more analgesic risk-averse during the past decade. Parents' analgesic trade-off preferences may influence their decisions to administer prescribed opioids after surgery, which may contribute to children's pain outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Analgesic trade-off preferences, or the relative preference for pain relief vs. risk aversion, shape parents' decisions to give prescription opioids to their children. These preferences may be influenced by personal experiences and societal factors. AIM: To examine whether parental analgesic trade-off preferences and opioid decision-making have shifted toward risk aversion during the opioid crisis in the United States. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of the preoperative survey data of parents from a single U.S. pediatric hospital whose children aged 5-17 years were to undergo painful surgery in 2013 (Time 1) or 2017/2019 (Time 2). Surveys assessed parents' analgesic trade-off preference (-12 or risk-averse to +12 or pain relief preferent, scores around 0=ambivalent) and their hypothetical decisions to give a prescribed opioid to a child in pain. RESULTS: Data from 847 parents were included (Time 1, n = 361; Time 2, n = 486). Parents at Time 2 were significantly more risk-averse compared with Time 1 (adj.β: -0.84 [95% CI: -1.09, -0.60]). Parents at Time 2 were more than twice as likely to be risk-averse or ambivalent (OR: 2.17 [95% CI: 1.62, 2.91]). There was a significant interaction effect of Time*Preference on parents' decision to give the opioid (adj. OR: 1.09 [95% CI: 1.03, 1.16]). At Time 2, parents who were ambivalent or risk-averse were less likely than those who preferred to relieve pain to administer the prescribed opioid (OR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.37, 0.89]). In contrast, there was no association between the preference group and the opioid decision at Time 1. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that parents of children scheduled for painful surgery at our pediatric hospital have become more analgesic risk-averse during the past decade. Parents' analgesic trade-off preferences may influence their decisions to administer prescribed opioids after surgery, which may contribute to children's pain outcomes.
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Ellen Lavoie Smith; Sarah Zyzanski; Alan R Tait Journal: Int J Nurs Stud Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Carol J Boyd; Philip T Veliz; Sean E McCabe; Monica J Weber; Alan R Tait Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Ellen L Smith; Richard W Redman; Sarah Zyzanski; Alan R Tait Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya; John A Grant; Sarah Dwyer; Asif Becher; Jacob H Schwartz; Alan R Tait Journal: Pain Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Robert L Ricca; Robert Baird; Calista M Harbaugh; Ashley Brady; Paula Garrett; Hale Wills; Jonathan Argo; Karen A Diefenbach; Marion C W Henry; Juan E Sola; Elaa M Mahdi; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Cynthia D Downard; Kenneth S Azarow; Tracy Shields; Eugene Kim Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Phillip Veliz; Justin Heinze; Carol J Boyd; Brian Zikmund-Fisher; Rachel Lenko; John Grant; Harrison Bromberg; Alyssa Kelly; Alan R Tait Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2022-01-31