Terri Voepel-Lewis1, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher2, Carol J Boyd3, Philip T Veliz3, Sean E McCabe3,4, Monica J Weber1, Alan R Tait1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology. 2. Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health. 3. Institute for Research on Women and Gender, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. 4. Center for the Study of Drugs, Alcohol, Smoking and Health, School of Nursing as positions for McCabe, Boyd, Veliz, Voepel-Lewis.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Poor parental understanding of prescription opioid risks is associated with potentially dangerous decisions that can contribute to adverse drug events (ADE) in children and adolescents. This study examined whether an interactive Scenario-tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) would (1) enhance opioid risk perceptions and (2) improve the safety of parents' decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 546 parents were randomized to receive the STOMP versus control information and 516 completed the program. A baseline survey assessed parents' opioid risk knowledge, perceptions, and preferences for pain relief versus risk avoidance (Pain Relief Preference). Parents then made hypothetical decisions to give or withhold a prescribed opioid for high-risk (excessive sedation) and low-risk (no ADE) scenarios. The STOMP provided immediate feedback with specific risk and guidance information; the control condition provided general information. We reassessed knowledge, perceptions, and decision-making up to 3 days thereafter. RESULTS: Following the intervention, the STOMP group became more risk avoidant (Pain Relief Preference, mean difference -1.27 [95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -1.75]; P<0.001) and gained higher perceptions of the critical risk, excessive sedation (+0.56 [0.27 to 0.85]; P<0.001). STOMP parents were less likely than controls to give a prescribed opioid in the high-risk situation (odds ratio, -0.14 [-0.24 to -0.05]; P=0.006) but similarly likely to give an opioid for the no ADE situation (P=0.192). DISCUSSION: The STOMP intervention enhanced risk perceptions, shifted preferences toward opioid risk avoidance, and led to better decisions regarding when to give or withhold an opioid for pain management. Scenario-tailored feedback may be an effective method to improve pain management while minimizing opioid risks.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Poor parental understanding of prescription opioid risks is associated with potentially dangerous decisions that can contribute to adverse drug events (ADE) in children and adolescents. This study examined whether an interactive Scenario-tailored Opioid Messaging Program (STOMP) would (1) enhance opioid risk perceptions and (2) improve the safety of parents' decision-making. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 546 parents were randomized to receive the STOMP versus control information and 516 completed the program. A baseline survey assessed parents' opioid risk knowledge, perceptions, and preferences for pain relief versus risk avoidance (Pain Relief Preference). Parents then made hypothetical decisions to give or withhold a prescribed opioid for high-risk (excessive sedation) and low-risk (no ADE) scenarios. The STOMP provided immediate feedback with specific risk and guidance information; the control condition provided general information. We reassessed knowledge, perceptions, and decision-making up to 3 days thereafter. RESULTS: Following the intervention, the STOMP group became more risk avoidant (Pain Relief Preference, mean difference -1.27 [95% confidence interval, -0.8 to -1.75]; P<0.001) and gained higher perceptions of the critical risk, excessive sedation (+0.56 [0.27 to 0.85]; P<0.001). STOMP parents were less likely than controls to give a prescribed opioid in the high-risk situation (odds ratio, -0.14 [-0.24 to -0.05]; P=0.006) but similarly likely to give an opioid for the no ADE situation (P=0.192). DISCUSSION: The STOMP intervention enhanced risk perceptions, shifted preferences toward opioid risk avoidance, and led to better decisions regarding when to give or withhold an opioid for pain management. Scenario-tailored feedback may be an effective method to improve pain management while minimizing opioid risks.
Authors: Renee C B Manworren; Connor D McElligott; Peter V Deraska; James Santanelli; Sherry Blair; Kimberly A Ruscher; Richard Weiss; Christine Rader; Christine Finck; Michael Bourque; Brendan Campbell Journal: AORN J Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 0.676
Authors: Debra B Gordon; Oscar A de Leon-Casasola; Christopher L Wu; Kathleen A Sluka; Timothy J Brennan; Roger Chou Journal: J Pain Date: 2015-12-21 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Parvaz Madadi; Doris Hildebrandt; Inna Y Gong; Ute I Schwarz; Catherine Ciszkowski; Colin J D Ross; Johanna Sistonen; Bruce C Carleton; Michael R Hayden; Albert E Lauwers; Gideon Koren Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Frances A Farley; John Grant; Alan R Tait; Carol J Boyd; Sean Esteban McCabe; Monica Weber; Calista M Harbagh; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Carol J Boyd; Sean E McCabe; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Shobha Malviya; John Grant; Monica Weber; Alan R Tait Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Terri Voepel-Lewis; Shobha Malviya; John A Grant; Sarah Dwyer; Asif Becher; Jacob H Schwartz; Alan R Tait Journal: Pain Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 7.926
Authors: Lorraine I Kelley-Quon; Matthew G Kirkpatrick; Robert L Ricca; Robert Baird; Calista M Harbaugh; Ashley Brady; Paula Garrett; Hale Wills; Jonathan Argo; Karen A Diefenbach; Marion C W Henry; Juan E Sola; Elaa M Mahdi; Adam B Goldin; Shawn D St Peter; Cynthia D Downard; Kenneth S Azarow; Tracy Shields; Eugene Kim Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2021-01-01 Impact factor: 14.766