Literature DB >> 34007687

Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program.

Sarah E Vordenberg1, Michael A Smith1, Heidi L Diez1, Tami L Remington1, Jolene R Bostwick1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the use of a continuous quality improvement process for strengthening our simulated patient (SP) program and the initial steps that have been implemented. INNOVATION: A workgroup that included five clinical faculty with significant experience working with SPs and a strong interest in improving the SP program was developed. The Plan-Do-Study-Act model was used as it allowed for incremental quality improvement changes, in order to ensure a high-quality SP program designed to optimize student learning. Data were gathered from students, SPs, and faculty. Opportunities for improvement were prioritized based on anticipated benefits and available resources. Changes related to planning, implementation, and evaluation and feedback have been executed. CRITICAL ANALYSIS: Changes related to planning that were implemented included developing handbooks for SPs, faculty, and graduate student instructors, as well as material for students in order to better describe the program. SPs are now referred to as "simulated" as opposed to "standardized" as part of a broader effort to clarify the purpose of SP interactions to students. Streamlined rubrics have been piloted, including electronic rubrics for first year students. SPs are being trained on fewer cases, in order to improve the training program. When possible, activities now take place in one large classroom instead of many small classrooms to improve oversight. Finally, additional feedback has been obtained from SPs via a retreat. These changes have been well received by students, SPs, and faculty. NEXT STEPS: The collection of this data and initial quality improvement changes provided a basis for hiring a full-time employee who will: dedicate 50% of their time to programmatic assessment of the SP program, support faculty with logistics and training, and be the face of our program to the students and SPs. Further, formal quantitative and qualitative assessment of the SP program has begun. © University of Minnesota Libraries Publishing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Standardized patient; pharmacy education; quality improvement; simulated patient

Year:  2018        PMID: 34007687      PMCID: PMC6438543          DOI: 10.24926/iip.v9i2.989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Innov Pharm        ISSN: 2155-0417


  5 in total

Review 1.  The Benefits and Risks of Being a Standardized Patient: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Joseph Plaksin; Joseph Nicholson; Sarita Kundrod; Sondra Zabar; Adina Kalet; Lisa Altshuler
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  The PDSA cycle at the core of learning in health professions education.

Authors:  G D Cleghorn; L A Headrick
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1996-03

Review 3.  Quality assurance processes for standardized patient programs.

Authors:  Shelley Zhang; Kristin K Soreide; Sarah E Kelling; Jolene R Bostwick
Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn       Date:  2018-01-04

4.  Use of simulation-based teaching methodologies in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.

Authors:  Deepti Vyas; Brenda S Bray; Megan N Wilson
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP).

Authors:  Karen L Lewis; Carrie A Bohnert; Wendy L Gammon; Henrike Hölzer; Lorraine Lyman; Cathy Smith; Tonya M Thompson; Amelia Wallace; Gayle Gliva-McConvey
Journal:  Adv Simul (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-27
  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Quality in Standardized Patient Training and Delivery: Retrospective Documentary Analysis of Trainer and Instructor Feedback.

Authors:  Derya Uzelli Yılmaz; Nicole Last; Janice Harvey; Leigh Norman; Sandra Monteiro; Matthew Sibbald
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-07

2.  Using the Higher Learning Commission's Assessment Culture Matrix to Support Continuous Quality Improvement of a Simulated Patient Program.

Authors:  Molly Genereaux; Michelle Nguyen; Jolene R Bostwick; Sarah E Vordenberg
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2021-04-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.