Literature DB >> 29793717

Quality assurance processes for standardized patient programs.

Shelley Zhang1, Kristin K Soreide2, Sarah E Kelling3, Jolene R Bostwick4.   

Abstract

OUR PROBLEM: As the pharmacy profession evolves to include non-dispensing services and collaborative care, greater emphasis is placed on communication skills building through standardized patient programs. Best practices for assuring the quality of standardized patient (SP) programs, however, remains unclear. The objective of this manuscript is to summarize quality assurance processes for standardized patient programs from health professions education literature. METHODOLOGICAL LITERATURE REVIEW: A search of PubMed and Scopus between 2011 and 2016 was conducted and 22 articles were retained for thematic analysis. Articles were screened for relevance to quality assurance. OUR RECOMMENDATIONS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS: The thematic analysis revealed four themes: (1) enhanced SP training programs, (2) structured feedback to students, (3) statistical measurements to ensure inter-rater reliability, and (4) observation and evaluation of the SP to improve SP performance. Specific methods to assure the quality of an SP program were identified, including training program content and feedback techniques. POTENTIAL IMPACT: Although SP programs varied widely in their implementation, there were several common strategies used to evaluate the consistency of performance, effectiveness of feedback to students, and reliability of grading. Additional research is necessary to establish standards for SP programs across professional healthcare disciplines.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Communication; Pharmacy; Reliability; Simulation; Standardized patient

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29793717     DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2017.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Pharm Teach Learn        ISSN: 1877-1297


  6 in total

1.  Using the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) Model for Continuous Quality Improvement of an Established Simulated Patient Program.

Authors:  Sarah E Vordenberg; Michael A Smith; Heidi L Diez; Tami L Remington; Jolene R Bostwick
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2018-08-20

2.  The utilization of simulated patients for teaching and learning in the pharmacy curriculum: exploring pharmacy students' and recent alumni's perceptions using mixed-methods approach.

Authors:  Hager ElGeed; Maguy Saffouh El Hajj; Raja Ali; Ahmed Awaisu
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Quality in Standardized Patient Training and Delivery: Retrospective Documentary Analysis of Trainer and Instructor Feedback.

Authors:  Derya Uzelli Yılmaz; Nicole Last; Janice Harvey; Leigh Norman; Sandra Monteiro; Matthew Sibbald
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-01-07

4.  Patient satisfaction and its health provider-related determinants in primary health facilities in rural China.

Authors:  Qiufeng Gao; Meili Liu; Lanxi Peng; Yang Zhang; Yaojiang Shi; Dirk E Teuwen; Hongmei Yi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.908

Review 5.  Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.

Authors:  Jithin K Sreedharan; Arun Vijay Subbarayalu; Saad M AlRabeeah; Manjush Karthika; Madhuragauri Shevade; Musallam Abdullah Al Nasser; Abdullah S Alqahtani
Journal:  Can J Respir Ther       Date:  2022-07-26

6.  Using the Higher Learning Commission's Assessment Culture Matrix to Support Continuous Quality Improvement of a Simulated Patient Program.

Authors:  Molly Genereaux; Michelle Nguyen; Jolene R Bostwick; Sarah E Vordenberg
Journal:  Innov Pharm       Date:  2021-04-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.