Laurel Raffington1,2, Daniel W Belsky3,4, Meeraj Kothari4, Margherita Malanchini5,2,6, Elliot M Tucker-Drob5,2,7, K Paige Harden5,2,7. 1. Department of Psychology and laurel.raffington@austin.utexas.edu. 2. Population Research Center, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas. 3. Department of Epidemiology and. 4. The Robert N. Butler Columbia Aging Center, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York; and. 5. Department of Psychology and. 6. Department of Biological and Experimental Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom. 7. Contributed equally as co-lead authors.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children who grow up in socioeconomic disadvantage face increased burden of disease and disability throughout their lives. One hypothesized mechanism for this increased burden is that early-life disadvantage accelerates biological processes of aging, increasing vulnerability to subsequent disease. To evaluate this hypothesis and the potential impact of preventive interventions, measures are needed that can quantify early acceleration of biological aging in childhood. METHODS: Saliva DNA methylation and socioeconomic circumstances were measured in N = 600 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years (48% female) participating in the Texas Twin Project. We measured pace of biological aging using the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm, developed to quantify the pace-of-aging-related decline in system integrity. We tested if children in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster pace of aging as compared with children in more affluent contexts. RESULTS: Children living in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging (r = 0.18; P = .001 for both). Latinx-identifying children exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging compared with both White- and Latinx White-identifying children, consistent with higher levels of disadvantage in this group. Children with more advanced pubertal development, higher BMI, and more tobacco exposure exhibited faster a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging. However, DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging associations with socioeconomic disadvantage were robust to control for these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Children growing up under conditions of socioeconomic disadvantage exhibit a faster pace of biological aging. DNA methylation pace of aging might be useful as a surrogate end point in evaluation of programs and policies to address the childhood social determinants of lifelong health disparities.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children who grow up in socioeconomic disadvantage face increased burden of disease and disability throughout their lives. One hypothesized mechanism for this increased burden is that early-life disadvantage accelerates biological processes of aging, increasing vulnerability to subsequent disease. To evaluate this hypothesis and the potential impact of preventive interventions, measures are needed that can quantify early acceleration of biological aging in childhood. METHODS: Saliva DNA methylation and socioeconomic circumstances were measured in N = 600 children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years (48% female) participating in the Texas Twin Project. We measured pace of biological aging using the DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm, developed to quantify the pace-of-aging-related decline in system integrity. We tested if children in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster pace of aging as compared with children in more affluent contexts. RESULTS: Children living in more disadvantaged families and neighborhoods exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging (r = 0.18; P = .001 for both). Latinx-identifying children exhibited a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging compared with both White- and Latinx White-identifying children, consistent with higher levels of disadvantage in this group. Children with more advanced pubertal development, higher BMI, and more tobacco exposure exhibited faster a faster DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging. However, DunedinPoAm-measured pace of aging associations with socioeconomic disadvantage were robust to control for these factors. CONCLUSIONS: Children growing up under conditions of socioeconomic disadvantage exhibit a faster pace of biological aging. DNA methylation pace of aging might be useful as a surrogate end point in evaluation of programs and policies to address the childhood social determinants of lifelong health disparities.
Authors: Noah Snyder-Mackler; Joseph Robert Burger; Lauren Gaydosh; Daniel W Belsky; Grace A Noppert; Fernando A Campos; Alessandro Bartolomucci; Yang Claire Yang; Allison E Aiello; Angela O'Rand; Kathleen Mullan Harris; Carol A Shively; Susan C Alberts; Jenny Tung Journal: Science Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Peter Muennig; Bruce McEwen; Daniel W Belsky; Kimberly G Noble; James Riccio; Jennifer Manly Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Karen Sugden; Eilis J Hannon; Louise Arseneault; Daniel W Belsky; Jonathan M Broadbent; David L Corcoran; Robert J Hancox; Renate M Houts; Terrie E Moffitt; Richie Poulton; Joseph A Prinz; W Murray Thomson; Benjamin S Williams; Chloe C Y Wong; Jonathan Mill; Avshalom Caspi Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Daniel W Belsky; Avshalom Caspi; David L Corcoran; Karen Sugden; Richie Poulton; Louise Arseneault; Andrea Baccarelli; Kartik Chamarti; Xu Gao; Eilis Hannon; Hona Lee Harrington; Renate Houts; Meeraj Kothari; Dayoon Kwon; Jonathan Mill; Joel Schwartz; Pantel Vokonas; Cuicui Wang; Benjamin S Williams; Terrie E Moffitt Journal: Elife Date: 2022-01-14 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Laura Etzel; Waylon J Hastings; Molly A Hall; Christine M Heim; Michael J Meaney; Jennie G Noll; Kieran J O'Donnell; Irina Pokhvisneva; Emma J Rose; Hannah M C Schreier; Chad E Shenk; Idan Shalev Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 4.996
Authors: Lauren L Schmitz; Wei Zhao; Scott M Ratliff; Julia Goodwin; Jiacheng Miao; Qiongshi Lu; Xiuqing Guo; Kent D Taylor; Jingzhong Ding; Yongmei Liu; Morgan Levine; Jennifer A Smith Journal: Epigenetics Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 4.861