Literature DB >> 35615471

Social mobility and biological aging among older adults in the United States.

Gloria Huei-Jong Graf1, Yalu Zhang2, Benjamin W Domingue3, Kathleen Mullan Harris4, Meeraj Kothari5, Dayoon Kwon5, Peter Muennig6, Daniel W Belsky1.   

Abstract

Lower socioeconomic status is associated with faster biological aging, the gradual and progressive decline in system integrity that accumulates with advancing age. Efforts to promote upward social mobility may, therefore, extend healthy lifespan. However, recent studies suggest that upward mobility may also have biological costs related to the stresses of crossing social boundaries. We tested associations of life-course social mobility with biological aging using data from participants in the 2016 Health and Retirement Study (HRS) Venous Blood Study who provided blood-chemistry (n = 9,255) and/or DNA methylation (DNAm) data (n = 3,976). We quantified social mobility from childhood to later-life using data on childhood family characteristics, educational attainment, and wealth accumulation. We quantified biological aging using 3 DNAm "clocks" and 3 blood-chemistry algorithms. We observed substantial social mobility among study participants. Those who achieved upward mobility exhibited less-advanced and slower biological aging. Associations of upward mobility with less-advanced and slower aging were consistent for blood-chemistry and DNAm measures of biological aging, and were similar for men and women and for Black and White Americans (Pearson-r effect-sizes ∼0.2 for blood-chemistry measures and the DNAm GrimAge clock and DunedinPoAm pace-of-aging measures; effect-sizes were smaller for the DNAm PhenoAge clock). Analysis restricted to educational mobility suggested differential effects by racial identity; mediating links between educational mobility and healthy aging may be disrupted by structural racism. In contrast, mobility producing accumulation of wealth appeared to benefit White and Black Americans equally, suggesting economic intervention to reduce wealth inequality may have potential to heal disparities in healthy aging.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Biological Aging; Health Disparities; Life Course; Social Determinants of Health; Social Mobility

Year:  2022        PMID: 35615471      PMCID: PMC9123172          DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PNAS Nexus        ISSN: 2752-6542


  40 in total

1.  Persistence of skin-deep resilience in African American adults.

Authors:  Gene H Brody; Tianyi Yu; Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.267

2.  Intergenerational social mobility and allostatic load in Great Britain.

Authors:  Patrick Präg; Lindsay Richards
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 3.  A systematic review of biological, social and environmental factors associated with epigenetic clock acceleration.

Authors:  Lara Oblak; Jeroen van der Zaag; Albert T Higgins-Chen; Morgan E Levine; Marco P Boks
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 10.895

4.  Comparability of biological aging measures in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study, 1999-2002.

Authors:  Waylon J Hastings; Idan Shalev; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 5.  Integrating DNA Methylation Measures of Biological Aging into Social Determinants of Health Research.

Authors:  Laurel Raffington; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2022-02-18

6.  Neighborhood Poverty, College Attendance, and Diverging Profiles of Substance Use and Allostatic Load in Rural African American Youth.

Authors:  Edith Chen; Gregory E Miller; Gene H Brody; ManKit Lei
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-09

7.  A toolkit for quantification of biological age from blood chemistry and organ function test data: BioAge.

Authors:  Dayoon Kwon; Daniel W Belsky
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 7.713

8.  Socioeconomic position, lifestyle habits and biomarkers of epigenetic aging: a multi-cohort analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni Fiorito; Cathal McCrory; Oliver Robinson; Cristian Carmeli; Carolina Ochoa-Rosales; Yan Zhang; Elena Colicino; Pierre-Antoine Dugué; Fanny Artaud; Gareth J McKay; Ayoung Jeong; Pashupati P Mishra; Therese H Nøst; Vittorio Krogh; Salvatore Panico; Carlotta Sacerdote; Rosario Tumino; Domenico Palli; Giuseppe Matullo; Simonetta Guarrera; Martina Gandini; Murielle Bochud; Emmanouil Dermitzakis; Taulant Muka; Joel Schwartz; Pantel S Vokonas; Allan Just; Allison M Hodge; Graham G Giles; Melissa C Southey; Mikko A Hurme; Ian Young; Amy Jayne McKnight; Sonja Kunze; Melanie Waldenberger; Annette Peters; Lars Schwettmann; Eiliv Lund; Andrea Baccarelli; Roger L Milne; Rose A Kenny; Alexis Elbaz; Hermann Brenner; Frank Kee; Trudy Voortman; Nicole Probst-Hensch; Terho Lehtimäki; Paul Elliot; Silvia Stringhini; Paolo Vineis; Silvia Polidoro
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Quest for a summary measure of biological age: the health and retirement study.

Authors:  Eileen M Crimmins; Bharat Thyagarajan; Jung Ki Kim; David Weir; Jessica Faul
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 7.713

10.  Lower socioeconomic status and the acceleration of aging: An outcome-wide analysis.

Authors:  Andrew Steptoe; Paola Zaninotto
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.