Literature DB >> 34001160

Predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Chi Zhang1, Xiao Kun Li2, Li Wen Hu1, Chao Zheng3, Zhuang Zhuang Cong1, Yang Xu4, Jing Luo1, Gao Ming Wang5, Wen Feng Gu1, Kai Xie4, Chao Luo6, Yi Shen7,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Among the many possible postoperative complications, anastomotic leakage (AL) is the most common and serious. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the ability of various inflammatory and nutritional markers to predict postoperative AL in patients after esophagectomy.
METHODS: A total of 273 patients were retrospectively evaluated and enrolled into this study. Perioperative, surgery-related, tumor-related and laboratory tests data were extracted and analyzed. The discriminatory ability and optimal cut-off value was evaluated according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to access the potential risk factors for AL.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of AL was 12.5% (34/273). C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CRP/ALB ratio) [AUC 0.943 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.911-0.976, p <  0.001)] and operation time [AUC 0.747 (95% CI = 0.679-0.815, p <  0.001)] had the greatest discrimination on AL prediction. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CRP/ALB ratio and operation time were two independent risk factors for AL, and CRP/ALB ratio (OR = 102.909, p <  0.001) had an advantage over operation time (OR = 9.363, p = 0.020; Table 3).
CONCLUSION: Operation time and postoperative CRP/ALB ratio were two independent predictive indexes for AL. Postoperative CRP/ALB ratio greater than 3.00 indicated a high risk of AL. For patients with abnormal postoperative CRP/ALB ratio, early non-operative treatment or surgical intervention are needed to reduce the serious sequelae of AL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Albumin; Anastomotic leakage; C-reactive protein; Esophagectomy; Risk factor

Year:  2021        PMID: 34001160     DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01515-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1749-8090            Impact factor:   1.637


  38 in total

Review 1.  Anastomotic Leakage Following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carolyn E Jones; Thomas J Watson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  The Impact of Severe Anastomotic Leak on Long-term Survival and Cancer Recurrence After Surgical Resection for Esophageal Malignancy.

Authors:  Sheraz Markar; Caroline Gronnier; Alain Duhamel; Jean-Yves Mabrut; Jean-Pierre Bail; Nicolas Carrere; Jérémie H Lefevre; Cécile Brigand; Jean-Christophe Vaillant; Mustapha Adham; Simon Msika; Nicolas Demartines; Issam El Nakadi; Bernard Meunier; Denis Collet; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Generalized cardiovascular disease on a preoperative CT scan is predictive for anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Alicia S Borggreve; Lucas Goense; Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg; Pim A de Jong; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study.

Authors:  Martin Rutegård; Pernilla Lagergren; Ioannis Rouvelas; Jesper Lagergren
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after gastroesophageal cancer resection is associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Authors:  Steen C Kofoed; Dan Calatayud; Lone S Jensen; Frederik Helgstrand; Michael P Achiam; Pieter De Heer; Lars B Svendsen
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Anastomotic leak predicts diminished long-term survival after resection for gastric and esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Andreas Andreou; Matthias Biebl; Mehran Dadras; Benjamin Struecker; Igor M Sauer; Peter C Thuss-Patience; Sascha Chopra; Panagiotis Fikatas; Marcus Bahra; Daniel Seehofer; Johann Pratschke; Sven-Christian Schmidt
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients.

Authors:  Rafe C Connors; Brian C Reuben; Leigh A Neumayer; David A Bull
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 8.  Treatments for esophageal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kato; Masanobu Nakajima
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-04-09

9.  Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Abbas Tabatabai; Mozaffar Hashemi; Gholamreza Mohajeri; Mojtaba Ahmadinejad; Ishfaq Abass Khan; Saeid Haghdani
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.219

10.  Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yin-Jiang Liu; Jun Fan; Huang-He He; Shu-Sheng Zhu; Qiu-Lan Chen; Rong-Hua Cao
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.692

View more
  1 in total

1.  Routine Radiologic Assessment for Anastomotic Leak Is Not Necessary in Asymptomatic Patients After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Hansol Kang; Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Ryan M Thomas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.452

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.