Literature DB >> 18035255

Comparing outcomes after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy: a 5-year prospective cohort of 17,395 patients.

Rafe C Connors1, Brian C Reuben, Leigh A Neumayer, David A Bull.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Debate continues over whether transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) offers decreased morbidity and mortality compared with transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE). To definitively answer this question, we used the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database to compare morbidity and mortality after THE and TTE. STUDY
DESIGN: Using ICD-9 procedure codes, we queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database for patients undergoing THE and TTE. Multivariate statistical analysis was completed to compare morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and hospital volume analysis between the groups.
RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2003, 17,395 patients included in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample underwent esophagectomy. Mean patient age was similar in those undergoing THE and TTE (61.9 versus 62.0 years, respectively). Overall morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy were 50.7% and 8.8%, respectively. In-hospital mortality after THE was 8.91% compared with 8.47% after TTE (p=0.642). Multivariate regression analysis showed no difference in the incidence of mediastinitis, wound, infectious, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, systemic, procedure-related, or overall complications or hospital length of stay between the two groups. Controlling additionally for hospital volume showed high-volume centers (more than 10 esophagectomies per year) had significantly lower mortality rates than low-volume centers (10 or fewer esophagectomies per year, p=0.024). Additionally, low-volume centers have a higher incidence of gastrointestinal and systemic complications in the TTE group (p=0.048 and p=0.038, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: This large-volume, multicenter study constitutes the largest cohort in the literature to compare outcomes after THE and TTE. These findings indicate the outcomes after THE and TTE for esophageal disease are equivalent, although higher-volume centers will have lower morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035255     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  43 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic options for treatment of dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.

Authors:  R Brooks Vance; Kerry B Dunbar
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-12-25

2.  Traveling to a High-volume Center is Associated With Improved Survival for Patients With Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Paul J Speicher; Brian R Englum; Asvin M Ganapathi; Xiaofei Wang; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  The esophageal anastomosis: traditional methods to prevent leak.

Authors:  Daniel P Raymond
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy with extracorporeal gastric conduit creation--how I do it.

Authors:  Francesco Palazzo; Nathaniel R Evans; Ernest L Rosato
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Relative value units poorly correlate with measures of surgical effort and complexity.

Authors:  Dhruvil R Shah; Richard J Bold; Anthony D Yang; Vijay P Khatri; Steve R Martinez; Robert J Canter
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Open surgical treatment for esophageal cancer: transhiatal vs. transthoracic, does it really matter?

Authors:  Uriel Clemente-Gutiérrez; Heriberto Medina-Franco; Oscar Santes; Jesús Morales-Maza; Alejandro Alfaro-Goldaracena; Martin J Heslin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2019-08

7.  Mortality after esophagectomy is heavily impacted by center volume: retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Cristina R Harnsberger; Ryan C Broderick; David C Chang; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Michael Bouvet; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Gastric ischemic conditioning increases neovascularization and reduces inflammation and fibrosis during gastroesophageal anastomotic healing.

Authors:  Kyle A Perry; Ambar Banarjee; James Liu; Nilay Shah; Mark R Wendling; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Impact of Positive Margins on Survival in Patients Undergoing Esophagogastrectomy for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey Javidfar; Paul J Speicher; Matthew G Hartwig; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark F Berry
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience.

Authors:  Nadim Khan; Adil Bangash; Muzaffaruddin Sadiq
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.