Literature DB >> 25986493

Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after gastroesophageal cancer resection is associated with increased risk of recurrence.

Steen C Kofoed1, Dan Calatayud2, Lone S Jensen3, Frederik Helgstrand2, Michael P Achiam2, Pieter De Heer2, Lars B Svendsen2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after intended curative resection for cancer in the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction has a negative impact on long-term survival. The aim of this study was to investigate whether an anastomotic leakage was associated with an increased recurrence rate.
METHODS: This nationwide study included consecutively collected data on patients undergoing curative surgical resection with intrathoracic anastomosis, alive 8 weeks postoperatively, between 2003 and 2011. Patients with incomplete resection, or metastatic disease intraoperatively, were excluded. Only biopsy-proven recurrences were accepted.
RESULTS: In total, 1085 patients were included. The frequency of anastomotic leakage was 8.6%. The median follow-up time was 29 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 13-58 months). Overall, 369 (34%) patients had disease recurrence, of which 346 patients died of recurrent gastroesophageal carcinoma. Twenty-three patients were alive with recurrence at the censoring date. In the study period, 333 patients died without signs of recurrent disease. The overall median time to recurrence was 66 weeks (IQR: 38-109 weeks). Distant metastases were found in 267 (25%), and local disease recurrence in 102 (9%) patients. Overall, 5-year disease-free survival in patients with leakage was 27%, versus 39% in those without leakage (P = .017). Anastomotic leakage was independently associated with higher risk of recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-2.29, P = .004) and all-cause mortality (HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.23-2.05, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage increased the risk of recurrence in patients who underwent curative gastroesophageal cancer resection.
Copyright © 2015 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Leak; cancer; gastroesophageal; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25986493     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  17 in total

Review 1.  The challenge of post-operative peritonitis after gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Massimo Sartelli; Ewen A Griffiths; Maurizio Nestori
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-08-12

2.  Prolonged postoperative length of stay is associated with poor overall survival after an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Longfei Ma; Jingpei Li; Longlong Shao; Dong Lin; Jiaqing Xiang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kristine Elisabeth Eberhard; Michael Patrick Achiam; Hans Christian Rolff; Mohamed Belmouhand; Lars Bo Svendsen; Morten Thorsteinsson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The dynamic of nasogastric decompression after esophagectomy and its predictive value of postoperative complications.

Authors:  Yan Zhao; Jie Guo; Bin You; Shengcai Hou; Bin Hu; Hui Li
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Phase II Trial Evaluating Esophageal Anastomotic Reinforcement with a Biologic, Degradable, Extracellular Matrix after Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Elvira L Vos; Masaya Nakauchi; Marinela Capanu; Bernard J Park; Daniel G Coit; Daniela Molena; Samuel S Yoon; David R Jones; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2022-05-01       Impact factor: 6.532

6.  Laser speckle contrast imaging and quantitative fluorescence angiography for perfusion assessment.

Authors:  Jonas Hedelund Rønn; Nikolaj Nerup; Rune Broni Strandby; Morten Bo Søndergaard Svendsen; Rikard Ambrus; Lars Bo Svendsen; Michael Patrick Achiam
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-05-04       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Surgical and oncological efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer by propensity score matching: a retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Yingcong Fan; Maoxing Liu; Shijie Li; Jianhong Yu; Xinyu Qi; Fei Tan; Kai Xu; Nan Zhang; Zhendan Yao; Hong Yang; Chenghai Zhang; Jiadi Xing; Zaozao Wang; Ming Cui; Xiangqian Su
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Xiao Kun Li; Li Wen Hu; Chao Zheng; Zhuang Zhuang Cong; Yang Xu; Jing Luo; Gao Ming Wang; Wen Feng Gu; Kai Xie; Chao Luo; Yi Shen
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 1.637

9.  Treatment of Anastomotic Recurrence After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Rebecca A Carr; Caitlin Harrington; Elvira Vos; Manjit S Bains; Matthew J Bott; James M Isbell; Bernard J Park; Smita Sihag; David R Jones; Daniela Molena
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 5.102

10.  Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Neoplastic Esophagogastric Anastomotic Strictures After Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Pengfei Xie; Meipan Yin; Wei He; Yaozhen Ma; Chunxia Li; Zhen Li; Xiaobing Li; Shuai Wang; Gang Wu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.