Literature DB >> 33994837

Fatigue risk management based on self-reported fatigue: Expanding a biomathematical model of fatigue-related performance deficits to also predict subjective sleepiness.

Mark E McCauley1,2, Peter McCauley1, Samantha M Riedy3, Siobhan Banks4, Adrian J Ecker3, Leonid V Kalachev5, Suresh Rangan6, David F Dinges3, Hans P A Van Dongen1,2.   

Abstract

Biomathematical models of fatigue can be used to predict neurobehavioral deficits during sleep/wake or work/rest schedules. Current models make predictions for objective performance deficits and/or subjective sleepiness, but known differences in the temporal dynamics of objective versus subjective outcomes have not been addressed. We expanded a biomathematical model of fatigue previously developed to predict objective performance deficits as measured on the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) to also predict subjective sleepiness as self-reported on the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS). Four model parameters were re-estimated to capture the distinct dynamics of the KSS and account for the scale difference between KSS and PVT. Two separate ensembles of datasets - drawn from laboratory studies of sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, simulated night work, napping, and recovery sleep - were used for calibration and subsequent validation of the model for subjective sleepiness. The expanded model was found to exhibit high prediction accuracy for subjective sleepiness, while retaining high prediction accuracy for objective performance deficits. Application of the validated model to an example scenario based on cargo aviation operations revealed divergence between predictions for objective and subjective outcomes, with subjective sleepiness substantially underestimating accumulating objective impairment, which has important real-world implications. In safety-sensitive operations such as commercial aviation, where self-ratings of sleepiness are used as part of fatigue risk management, the systematic differences in the temporal dynamics of objective versus subjective measures of functional impairment point to a potentially significant risk evaluation sensitivity gap. The expanded biomathematical model of fatigue presented here provides a useful quantitative tool to bridge this previously unrecognized gap.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alertness; Fatigue and performance models; Fatigue risk management; Karolinska Sleepiness Scale; Psychomotor Vigilance Test; Self-rated sleepiness

Year:  2021        PMID: 33994837      PMCID: PMC8117424          DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav        ISSN: 1369-8478


  34 in total

1.  Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual.

Authors:  T Akerstedt; M Gillberg
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.292

2.  Fatigue risk management in flight crew scheduling.

Authors:  Emma Romig; Tomas Klemets
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2009-12

3.  Predictive and proactive fatigue risk management approaches in commercial aviation.

Authors:  Suresh Rangan; Samantha M Riedy; Rob Bassett; Zachary A Klinck; Patrick Hagerty; Ethan Schek; Ying Zhang; Steven R Hursh; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  Naturalistic field study of the restart break in US commercial motor vehicle drivers: Truck driving, sleep, and fatigue.

Authors:  Amy R Sparrow; Daniel J Mollicone; Kevin Kan; Rachel Bartels; Brieann C Satterfield; Samantha M Riedy; Aaron Unice; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-05-09

Review 5.  Modelling fatigue and the use of fatigue models in work settings.

Authors:  Drew Dawson; Y Ian Noy; Mikko Härmä; Torbjorn Akerstedt; Gregory Belenky
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2011-03

Review 6.  Predicting cognitive impairment and accident risk.

Authors:  Thomas G Raslear; Steven R Hursh; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.453

7.  Effects of sleep deprivation on dissociated components of executive functioning.

Authors:  Adrienne M Tucker; Paul Whitney; Gregory Belenky; John M Hinson; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.849

8.  Fatiguing effect of multiple take-offs and landings in regional airline operations.

Authors:  Kimberly A Honn; Brieann C Satterfield; Peter McCauley; J Lynn Caldwell; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2015-11-17

Review 9.  Sleep deprivation and vigilant attention.

Authors:  Julian Lim; David F Dinges
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  An ensemble mixed effects model of sleep loss and performance.

Authors:  Courtney Cochrane; Demba Ba; Elizabeth B Klerman; Melissa A St Hilaire
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 2.691

View more
  1 in total

1.  Working around the Clock: Is a Person's Endogenous Circadian Timing for Optimal Neurobehavioral Functioning Inherently Task-Dependent?

Authors:  Rachael A Muck; Amanda N Hudson; Kimberly A Honn; Shobhan Gaddameedhi; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Clocks Sleep       Date:  2022-02-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.