Literature DB >> 32966825

An ensemble mixed effects model of sleep loss and performance.

Courtney Cochrane1, Demba Ba1, Elizabeth B Klerman2, Melissa A St Hilaire3.   

Abstract

Sleep loss causes decrements in cognitive performance, which increases risks to those in safety-sensitive fields, including medicine and aviation. Mathematical models can be formulated to predict performance decrement in response to sleep loss, with the goal of identifying when an individual may be at highest risk for an accident. This work produces an Ensemble Mixed Effects Model that combines a traditional Linear Mixed Effects (LME) model with a semi-parametric, nonlinear model called Mixed Effects Random Forest (MERF). Using this model, we predict performance on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), a test of sustained attention, using biologically motivated features extracted from a dataset containing demographic, sleep, and cognitive test data from 44 healthy participants studied during inpatient sleep loss laboratory experiments. Our Ensemble Mixed Effects Model accurately predicts an individual's trend in PVT performance, and fits the data better than prior published models. The ensemble successfully combines MERF's high rate of peak identification with LME's conservative predictions. We investigate two questions relevant to this model's potential use in operational settings: the tradeoff between additional model features versus ease of collecting these features in real-world settings, and how recent a cognitive task must have been administered to produce strong predictions. This work addresses limitations of previous approaches by developing a predictive model that accounts for interindividual differences and utilizes a nonlinear, semi-parametric method called MERF. We methodologically address the modeling decisions required for this prediction problem, including the choice of cross-validation method. This work is novel in its use of data from a highly-controlled inpatient study protocol that uncouples the influence of the sleep-wake cycle from the endogenous circadian rhythm on the cognitive task being modeled. This uncoupling provides a clearer picture of the model's real-world predictive ability for situations in which people work at different circadian times (e.g., night- or shift-work).
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ensemble mixed effects models; Human; Individual differences; Machine learning; Psychomotor vigilance task; Sleep loss

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32966825      PMCID: PMC8631086          DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2020.110497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  28 in total

1.  Sleep deprivation and fatigue in residency training: results of a national survey of first- and second-year residents.

Authors:  DeWitt C Baldwin; Steven R Daugherty
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 5.849

2.  Shift work and disturbed sleep/wakefulness.

Authors:  T Akerstedt
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 11.609

3.  Adult age and digit symbol substitution performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; Robert S Stawski; Christina Wasylyshyn; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2004-03

Review 4.  Fatigue in the aviation environment: an overview of the causes and effects as well as recommended countermeasures.

Authors:  J A Caldwell
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1997-10

5.  Neurobehavioral performance of residents after heavy night call vs after alcohol ingestion.

Authors:  J Todd Arnedt; Judith Owens; Megan Crouch; Jessica Stahl; Mary A Carskadon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A two process model of sleep regulation.

Authors:  A A Borbély
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1982

7.  Can a mathematical model predict an individual's trait-like response to both total and partial sleep loss?

Authors:  Sridhar Ramakrishnan; Wei Lu; Srinivas Laxminarayan; Nancy J Wesensten; Tracy L Rupp; Thomas J Balkin; Jaques Reifman
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 8.  Behavioral and physiological consequences of sleep restriction.

Authors:  Siobhan Banks; David F Dinges
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 4.062

9.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.

Authors:  Sudhir Varma; Richard Simon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Applying mathematical models to predict resident physician performance and alertness on traditional and novel work schedules.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Klerman; Scott A Beckett; Christopher P Landrigan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamic ensemble prediction of cognitive performance in spaceflight.

Authors:  Danni Tu; Mathias Basner; Michael G Smith; E Spencer Williams; Valerie E Ryder; Amelia A Romoser; Adrian Ecker; Daniel Aeschbach; Alexander C Stahn; Christopher W Jones; Kia Howard; Marc Kaizi-Lutu; David F Dinges; Haochang Shou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  Fatigue risk management based on self-reported fatigue: Expanding a biomathematical model of fatigue-related performance deficits to also predict subjective sleepiness.

Authors:  Mark E McCauley; Peter McCauley; Samantha M Riedy; Siobhan Banks; Adrian J Ecker; Leonid V Kalachev; Suresh Rangan; David F Dinges; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.