Literature DB >> 26590506

Fatiguing effect of multiple take-offs and landings in regional airline operations.

Kimberly A Honn1, Brieann C Satterfield2, Peter McCauley3, J Lynn Caldwell4, Hans P A Van Dongen5.   

Abstract

Fatigue is a risk factor for flight performance and safety in commercial aviation. In US commercial aviation, to help to curb fatigue, the maximum duration of flight duty periods is regulated based on the scheduled start time and the number of flight segments to be flown. There is scientific support for regulating maximum duty duration based on scheduled start time; fatigue is well established to be modulated by circadian rhythms. However, it has not been established scientifically whether the number of flight segments, per se, affects fatigue. To address this science gap, we conducted a randomized, counterbalanced, cross-over study with 24 active-duty regional airline pilots. Objective and subjective fatigue was compared between a 9-hour duty day with multiple take-offs and landings versus a duty day of equal duration with a single take-off and landing. To standardize experimental conditions and isolate the fatiguing effect of the number of segments flown, the entire duty schedules were carried out in a high-fidelity, moving-base, full-flight, regional jet flight simulator. Steps were taken to maintain operational realism, including simulated airplane inspections and acceptance checks, use of realistic dispatch releases and airport charts, real-world air traffic control interactions, etc. During each of the two duty days, 10 fatigue test bouts were administered, which included a 10-minute Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT) assessment of objective fatigue and Samn-Perelli (SP) and Karolinska Sleepiness Scale (KSS) assessments of subjective sleepiness/fatigue. Results showed a greater build-up of objective and subjective fatigue in the multi-segment duty day than in the single-segment duty day. With duty start time and duration and other variables that could impact fatigue levels held constant, the greater build-up of fatigue in the multi-segment duty day was attributable specifically to the difference in the number of flight segments flown. Compared to findings in previously published laboratory studies of simulated night shifts and nighttime sleep deprivation, the magnitude of the fatiguing effect of the multiple take-offs and landings was modest. Ratings of flight performance were not significantly reduced for the simulated multi-segment duty day. The US duty and flight time regulations for commercial aviation shorten the maximum duty duration in multi-segment operations by up to 25% depending on the duty start time. The present results represent an important first step in understanding fatigue in multi-segment operations, and provide support for the number of flight segments as a relevant factor in regulating maximum duty duration. Nonetheless, based on our fatigue results, a more moderate reduction in maximum duty duration as a function of the number of flight segments might be considered. However, further research is needed to include investigation of flight safety, and to extend our findings to nighttime operations.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alertness; Commercial aviation; Duty time regulations; High-fidelity flight simulator; Psychomotor vigilance; Task load

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26590506     DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  5 in total

1.  Guiding principles for determining work shift duration and addressing the effects of work shift duration on performance, safety, and health: guidance from the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the Sleep Research Society.

Authors:  Indira Gurubhagavatula; Laura K Barger; Christopher M Barnes; Mathias Basner; Diane B Boivin; Drew Dawson; Christopher L Drake; Erin E Flynn-Evans; Vincent Mysliwiec; P Daniel Patterson; Kathryn J Reid; Charles Samuels; Nita Lewis Shattuck; Uzma Kazmi; Gerard Carandang; Jonathan L Heald; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.062

2.  Fatigue risk management based on self-reported fatigue: Expanding a biomathematical model of fatigue-related performance deficits to also predict subjective sleepiness.

Authors:  Mark E McCauley; Peter McCauley; Samantha M Riedy; Siobhan Banks; Adrian J Ecker; Leonid V Kalachev; Suresh Rangan; David F Dinges; Hans P A Van Dongen
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2021-05-12

3.  Early starts and late finishes both reduce alertness and performance among short-haul airline pilots.

Authors:  Lucia Arsintescu; Sean Pradhan; Ravi G Chachad; Kevin B Gregory; Jeffrey B Mulligan; Erin E Flynn-Evans
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 5.296

4.  Integrating Soft Set Theory and Fuzzy Linguistic Model to Evaluate the Performance of Training Simulation Systems.

Authors:  Kuei-Hu Chang; Yung-Chia Chang; Kai Chain; Hsiang-Yu Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Sleep and Sleepiness Measured by Diaries and Actigraphy among Norwegian and Austrian Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) Pilots.

Authors:  Tine Almenning Flaa; Bjørn Bjorvatn; Ståle Pallesen; Erik Zakariassen; Anette Harris; Pia Gatterbauer-Trischler; Siri Waage
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.