| Literature DB >> 33993866 |
Jing Xu1, Xin Gong2, Chuanzhi Chen3, Jun Xing3, Qi Wang4, Weifeng Shen5, Qi Zhang6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether inflammatory and growth factors (IGFs) were associated with incomplete device endothelialization (IDE) at 6 months after successful left atrial appendage closure (LAAC).Entities:
Keywords: Basic fibroblast growth factor; Biomarker; Device-related endothelialization; Left atrial appendage closure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33993866 PMCID: PMC8126129 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-021-02059-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Fig. 1Flowchart of patient selection
Fig. 2Watchman device endothelialization assessed by cardiac CT. a complete occlusion of the left atrial appendage (no trans-fabric leak, LAA HU < 100 and LA/LAA < 0.25). b Incomplete endothelial coverage of the device (trans-fabric leak, LAA HU > 100)
Baseline clinical characteristics
| Total population | IDE | CDE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.71 ± 8.04 | 72.21 ± 8.141 | 69.56 ± 7.938 | 0.492 |
| Male gender, n (%) | 29 (52.7) | 19 (50.0) | 10 (58.8) | 0.545 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.97 ± 3.74 | 25.12 ± 3.17 | 27.85 ± 4.32 | 0.028 |
| Hypertension, n (%) | 44 (80.0) | 31 (81.6) | 13 (76.5) | 0.662 |
| Stroke, n (%), n (%) | 23 (41.8) | 16 (42.1) | 7 (41.2) | 0.949 |
| Diabetes, n (%) | 14 (25.5) | 11 (28.9) | 3 (17.6) | 0.374 |
| Coronary heart disease, n (%) | 20 (36.4) | 12 (31.6) | 8 (47.1) | 0.270 |
| Persistent/permanent AF, n (%) | 32 (58.2) | 20 (52.6) | 12 (70.6) | 0.212 |
| CHA2DS2-VASc score | 4.45 ± 1.71 | 4.55 ± 1.639 | 4.24 ± 1.888 | 0.554 |
| HAS-BLED score | 2.67 ± 0.94 | 2.68 ± 0.933 | 2.65 ± 0.996 | 0.894 |
| TTE measurement | ||||
| LA (mm) | 44.65 ± 6.28 | 44.68 ± 4.662 | 44.59 ± 9.111 | 0.968 |
| LVEF (%) | 61.18 ± 6.79 | 60.74 ± 7.325 | 62.18 ± 5.457 | 0.423 |
| LVEDD (mm) | 47.35 ± 5.32 | 47.26 ± 5.51 | 47.53 ± 5.04 | 0.861 |
| LVESD (mm) | 31.45 ± 5.07 | 31.61 ± 5.38 | 31.12 ± 4.44 | 0.727 |
| Procedural characteristics of LAAC | ||||
| Device size (mm) | 26.82 ± 3.4 | 26.61 ± 3.33 | 27.29 ± 3.62 | 0.509 |
| Device compression ratio (%) | 21.62 ± 4.68 | 21.66 ± 4.46 | 21.54 ± 5.40 | 0.945 |
| Peri-device leak (mm) | 0.03 ± 0.23 | 0.04 ± 0.28 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.324 |
| Warfarin at discharge | 19 (34.5) | 13 (34.2) | 6 (35.3) | 0.938 |
BMI, body mass index; AF, atrial fibrillation; TTE, transthoracic echocardiography; LA, left atrium; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVEDD, Left ventricular end diastolic diameter; LVESD, left ventricular end systolic diameter
Fig. 3Plasma levels of bFGF (pg/ml), PDGF (pg/ml), SDF-1a (ng/ml), TGF-β1 (pg/ml), VEGF-R1 (pg/ml) and vWF (mu/ml) in patients with incomplete (blue bar) and complete device endothelialization (white bar). (**means p < 0.05 )
Fig. 4ROC curve analysis using plasma bFGF to distinguish incomplete device endothelialization
Multivariate analysis
| Variables | OR | 95 %CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| bFGF | 11.752 | 2.869–48.144 | 0.001 |
| BMI | 2.479 | 0.521–11.792 | 0.254 |
| LVEF | 2.293 | 0.423–12.438 | 0.336 |
| Diabetes | 0.485 | 0.083–2.850 | 0.424 |
| Device size | 0.916 | 0.741–1.133 | 0.420 |
bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; BMI, body mass index; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction