Literature DB >> 33987788

Using a Frontline Staff Intervention to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Clinic.

Danielle L Heidemann1, Angie Adhami2, Anupama Nair3, Alexis Haftka-George3, Mariam Zaidan3, Vaidehi Seshadri3, Amy Tang4, David E Willens3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer is the third most common malignancy affecting women. Screening with Papanicolaou (Pap) tests effectively identifies precancerous lesions and early-stage cervical cancer. While the nationwide rate of cervical cancer screening (CCS) is 84%, our urban general internal medicine (GIM) clinic population had a CCS rate of 70% in 2016.
OBJECTIVE: To improve our clinic's CCS rate to match or exceed the national average within 18 months by identifying barriers and testing solutions.
DESIGN: A quality improvement project led by a multidisciplinary group of healthcare providers. PARTICIPANTS: Our GIM clinic includes 16 attending physicians, 116 resident physicians, and 20 medical assistants (MAs) with an insured and underserved patient population. INTERVENTION: Phase 1 lasted 9 months and implemented CCS patient outreach, patient financial incentives, and clinic staff education. Phase 2 lasted 9 months and involved a workflow change in which MAs identified candidates for CCS during patient check-in. Feedback spanned the entire study period. MAIN MEASURES: Our primary outcome was the number of Pap tests completed per month during the 2 study phases. Our secondary outcome was the clinic population's CCS rate for all eligible clinic patients. KEY
RESULTS: After interventions, the average number of monthly Pap tests increased from 35 to 56 in phase 1 and to 75 in phase 2. Of 385 patients contacted in phase 1, 283 scheduled a Pap test and 115 (41%) completed it. Compared to baseline, both interventions improved cervical cancer screening (phase 1 relative risk, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.64-2.10; P < 0.001; phase 2 relative risk, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.40-3.02; P < 0.001). Our clinic's CCS rate improved from 70% to 75% after the 18-month intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: The rate of CCS increased by 5% after a systematic 2-phase organizational intervention that empowered MAs to remind, identify, and prepare candidates during check-in for CCS.
© 2021. Society of General Internal Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cervical cancer screening; multidisciplinary team care; organizational intervention; prevention; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33987788      PMCID: PMC8390589          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-06865-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   6.473


  29 in total

Review 1.  The impact of interventions to improve attendance in female cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: a review.

Authors:  Teresa Spadea; Silvia Bellini; Anton Kunst; Irina Stirbu; Giuseppe Costa
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  New Roles for Medical Assistants in Innovative Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Susan A Chapman; Lisel K Blash
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: A systematic review.

Authors:  Imogen Rees; Daniel Jones; Hong Chen; Una Macleod
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Cancer screening at a federally qualified health center: a qualitative study on organizational challenges in the era of the patient-centered medical home.

Authors:  Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez; Esther Jhingan; Antoinette Angulo; Ricardo Jimenez; Beti Thompson; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-10

Review 5.  Organizational change: a way to increase colon, breast and cervical cancer screening in primary care practices.

Authors:  Ana Maria Arroyave; Eribeth K Penaranda; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-04

6.  Trends Over Time in Pap and Pap-HPV Cotesting for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Kathy L MacLaughlin; Robert M Jacobson; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Patrick M Wilson; Debra J Jacobson; Chun Fan; Jennifer L St Sauver; Lila J Finney Rutten
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care.

Authors:  Robert L Ferrer; Priti Mody-Bailey; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Sherrie Gott; Sara Araujo
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

8.  Addressing social determinants of health to improve access to early breast cancer detection: results of the Boston REACH 2010 Breast and Cervical Cancer Coalition Women's Health Demonstration Project.

Authors:  Cheryl R Clark; Nashira Baril; Marycarmen Kunicki; Natacha Johnson; Jane Soukup; Kathleen Ferguson; Stuart Lipsitz; JudyAnn Bigby
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Health coaching by medical assistants to improve control of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in low-income patients: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rachel Willard-Grace; Ellen H Chen; Danielle Hessler; Denise DeVore; Camille Prado; Thomas Bodenheimer; David H Thom
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 10.  Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.

Authors:  Thomas Everett; Andrew Bryant; Michelle F Griffin; Pierre Pl Martin-Hirsch; Carol A Forbes; Ruth G Jepson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.