Literature DB >> 29203349

Interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups: A systematic review.

Imogen Rees1, Daniel Jones2, Hong Chen2, Una Macleod2.   

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide. Screening can reduce both the incidence and mortality of the disease but is often not utilized by lower socioeconomic groups. A systematic review, including studies of interventions to improve breast and cervical cancer screening uptake, up to 2006, found targeted interventions could be effective. A formal update has been conducted on the effectiveness of interventions to improve the uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups. A systematic computerized literature search was undertaken in June 2016 for relevant papers published since 2006. Data was extracted on study participants, setting, intervention and control using a predefined extraction tool and a full quality assessment was undertaken using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This update yielded 16 studies of mixed quality, in addition to the 13 studies from the original review. The interventions were categorized into local interventions including HPV self-testing, lay health advisors, inreach, outreach and mixed, and strategies enhancing attendance within an organized program. This review has found two large, randomized controlled trials for the use of HPV self-testing to increase cervical screening uptake. Both reviews have found varying success using lay health advisors, with the majority of included papers reporting a statistically significant increase in screening uptake. HPV self-testing can improve uptake of cervical cancer screening among lower socioeconomic groups. This is a relatively new method of cervical screening that was not included in the earlier review. The findings of this updated review largely support that of the 2006 review for the use of lay health advisors.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare disparities; Mass screening; Papanicolaou test; Program evaluation; Review; Socioeconomic factors; Uterine cervical neoplasms

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29203349     DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  16 in total

Review 1.  Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Iliana C Lega; Wei Wu; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 10.122

2.  Acceptability and Concordance of Self- Versus Clinician- Sampling for HPV Testing among Rural South Indian Women.

Authors:  Purnima Madhivanan; Holly Nishimura; Kavitha Ravi; Benjamin Pope; Makella Coudray; Anjali Arun; Karl Krupp; Poornima Jayakrishna; Vijaya Srinivas
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.

Authors:  Martin O'Flaherty; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Simon Capewell; Angela Boland; Michelle Maden; Brendan Collins; Piotr Bandosz; Lirije Hyseni; Chris Kypridemos
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-05       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Using a Frontline Staff Intervention to Improve Cervical Cancer Screening in a Large Academic Internal Medicine Clinic.

Authors:  Danielle L Heidemann; Angie Adhami; Anupama Nair; Alexis Haftka-George; Mariam Zaidan; Vaidehi Seshadri; Amy Tang; David E Willens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Prognostic value of posttreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT and predictors of metabolic response to therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concomitant chemoradiation therapy: an analysis of intensity- and volume-based PET parameters.

Authors:  Giacomo Maria Lima; Antonella Matti; Giulio Vara; Giulia Dondi; Nicoletta Naselli; Eugenia Maria De Crescenzo; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Anna Myriam Perrone; Pierandrea De Iaco; Cristina Nanni; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Barriers to the non-acceptance of cervical cancer screenings (pap smear test) in women of childbearing age in a rural area of Peru.

Authors:  Augusto Felix Olaza-Maguiña; Yuliana Mercedes De la Cruz-Ramirez
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2019-01-31

Review 7.  Human Papilloma Virus-Associated Cervical Cancer and Health Disparities.

Authors:  Patti Olusola; Hirendra Nath Banerjee; Julie V Philley; Santanu Dasgupta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 6.600

8.  Cobas 4800 HPV detection in cervical samples of Polish women.

Authors:  Beata Smolarz; Dariusz Samulak; Krzysztof Szyłło; Marianna Makowska; Hanna Romanowicz; Zbigniew Kojs; Magdalena M Michalska
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2019-06-13

9.  Trends in cervical cancer screening rates among Korean women: results of the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2005-2020.

Authors:  Hye Young Shin; Yun Yeong Lee; Soo Yeon Song; Bomi Park; Mina Suh; Kui Son Choi; Jae Kwan Jun
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.756

10.  Universal cervical cancer control through a right to health lens: refocusing national policy and programmes on underserved women.

Authors:  Katrina Perehudoff; Heleen Vermandere; Alex Williams; Sergio Bautista-Arredondo; Elien De Paepe; Sonia Dias; Ana Gama; Ines Keygnaert; Adhemar Longatto-Filho; Jose Ortiz; Elizaveta Padalko; Rui Manuel Reis; Nathalie Vanderheijden; Bernardo Vega; Bo Verberckmoes; Olivier Degomme
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2020-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.