Rachel Willard-Grace1, Ellen H Chen2, Danielle Hessler3, Denise DeVore3, Camille Prado3, Thomas Bodenheimer3, David H Thom3. 1. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California willardr@fcm.ucsf.edu. 2. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California Silver Avenue Family Health Center, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, California. 3. Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE:Health coaching by medical assistants could be a financially viable model for providing self-management support in primary care if its effectiveness were demonstrated. We investigated whether in-clinic health coaching by medical assistants improves control of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors when compared with usual care. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial of 441 patients at 2 safety net primary care clinics in San Francisco, California. The primary outcome was a composite measure of being at or below goal at 12 months for at least 1 of 3 uncontrolled conditions at baseline as defined by hemoglobin A1c, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Secondary outcomes were meeting all 3 goals and meeting individual goals. Data were analyzed using χ(2) tests and linear regression models. RESULTS: Participants in the coaching arm were more likely to achieve both the primary composite measure of 1 of the clinical goals (46.4% vs 34.3%, P = .02) and the secondary composite measure of reaching all clinical goals (34.0% vs 24.7%, P = .05). Almost twice as many coached patients achieved the hemoglobin A1c goal (48.6% vs 27.6%, P = .01). At the larger study site, coached patients were more likely to achieve the LDL cholesterol goal (41.8% vs 25.4%, P = .04). The proportion of patients meeting the systolic blood pressure goal did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Medical assistants serving as in-clinic health coaches improved control of hemoglobinA1c and LDL levels, but not blood pressure, compared with usual care. Our results highlight the need to understand the relationship between patients' clinical conditions, interventions, and the contextual features of implementation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Health coaching by medical assistants could be a financially viable model for providing self-management support in primary care if its effectiveness were demonstrated. We investigated whether in-clinic health coaching by medical assistants improves control of cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors when compared with usual care. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month randomized controlled trial of 441 patients at 2 safety net primary care clinics in San Francisco, California. The primary outcome was a composite measure of being at or below goal at 12 months for at least 1 of 3 uncontrolled conditions at baseline as defined by hemoglobin A1c, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol. Secondary outcomes were meeting all 3 goals and meeting individual goals. Data were analyzed using χ(2) tests and linear regression models. RESULTS:Participants in the coaching arm were more likely to achieve both the primary composite measure of 1 of the clinical goals (46.4% vs 34.3%, P = .02) and the secondary composite measure of reaching all clinical goals (34.0% vs 24.7%, P = .05). Almost twice as many coached patients achieved the hemoglobin A1c goal (48.6% vs 27.6%, P = .01). At the larger study site, coached patients were more likely to achieve the LDL cholesterol goal (41.8% vs 25.4%, P = .04). The proportion of patients meeting the systolic blood pressure goal did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Medical assistants serving as in-clinic health coaches improved control of hemoglobin A1c and LDL levels, but not blood pressure, compared with usual care. Our results highlight the need to understand the relationship between patients' clinical conditions, interventions, and the contextual features of implementation.
Authors: Thomas G Pickering; John E Hall; Lawrence J Appel; Bonita E Falkner; John Graves; Martha N Hill; Daniel W Jones; Theodore Kurtz; Sheldon G Sheps; Edward J Roccella Journal: Hypertension Date: 2004-12-20 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: David Margolius; Thomas Bodenheimer; Heather Bennett; Jennifer Wong; Victoria Ngo; Guillermo Padilla; David H Thom Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Michael S Spencer; Ann-Marie Rosland; Edith C Kieffer; Brandy R Sinco; Melissa Valerio; Gloria Palmisano; Michael Anderson; J Ricardo Guzman; Michele Heisler Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-06-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Stephen M Petterson; Winston R Liaw; Robert L Phillips; David L Rabin; David S Meyers; Andrew W Bazemore Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Laurie Ruggiero; Ada Moadsiri; Paula Butler; Susan M Oros; Michael L Berbaum; Steven Whitman; Daisy Cintron Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2010 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: H Teoh; J-P Després; R Dufour; D H Fitchett; L Goldin; S G Goodman; S B Harris; A Langer; D C W Lau; E M Lonn; G B J Mancini; P A McFarlane; P Poirier; R Rabasa-Lhoret; M K Tan; L A Leiter Journal: Diabetes Obes Metab Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 6.577
Authors: Barbara J Turner; Christopher S Hollenbeak; Yuanyuan Liang; Kavita Pandit; Shelly Joseph; Mark G Weiner Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-05-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Rachel Willard-Grace; Chris Chirinos; Jessica Wolf; Denise DeVore; Beatrice Huang; Danielle Hessler; Stephanie Tsao; George Su; David H Thom Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Jermy-Leigh B Domingo; Andrea L Macabeo; Mairine Kaiko-George; Denise K Ropa; Thessalonica K Sandi; Olivia A Pascual; Cori L Takesue; Diana Mv Shaw; Joseph W Humphry Journal: Hawaii J Med Public Health Date: 2019-06
Authors: Anjana E Sharma; Rachel Willard-Grace; Danielle Hessler; Thomas Bodenheimer; David H Thom Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 5.166