| Literature DB >> 33986123 |
Dan P Zandberg1, Ashley V Menk2, Maria Velez1, Daniel Normolle1, Kristin DePeaux2,3, Angen Liu1, Robert L Ferris1,2, Greg M Delgoffe4,3.
Abstract
The majority of patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) (R/M) do not benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. Hypoxia induced immunosuppression may be a barrier to immunotherapy. Therefore, we examined the metabolic effect of anti-PD-1 therapy in a murine MEER HNSCC model as well as intratumoral hypoxia in R/M patients. In order to characterize the tumor microenvironment in PD-1 resistance, a MEER cell line was created from the parental line that are completely resistant to anti-PD-1. These cell lines were then metabolically profiled using seahorse technology and injected into C57/BL6 mice. After tumor growth, mice were pulsed with pimonidazole and immunofluorescent imaging was performed to analyze hypoxia and T cell infiltration. To validate the preclinical results, we analyzed tissues from R/M patients (n=36) treated with anti-PD-1 mAb, via immunofluorescent imaging for number of CD8+ T cells (CD8), Tregs and the percent area (CAIX) and mean intensity (I) of carbonic anhydrase IX in tumor. We analyzed disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) using proportional odds and proportional hazards (Cox) regression. We found that anti-PD-1 resistant MEER has significantly higher oxidative metabolism, while there was no difference in glycolytic metabolism. Intratumoral hypoxia was significantly increased and CD8+ T cells decreased in anti-PD-1 resistant tumors compared with parental tumors in the same mouse. In R/M patients, lower tumor hypoxia by CAIX/I was significantly associated with DCR (p=0.007), PFS, and OS, and independently associated with response (p=0.028) and PFS (p=0.04) in a multivariate model including other significant immune factors. During PD-1 resistance, tumor cells developed increased oxidative metabolism leading to increased intratumoral hypoxia and a decrease in CD8+ T cells. Lower tumor hypoxia was independently associated with increased efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with R/M HNSCC. To our knowledge this is the first analysis of the effect of hypoxia in this patient population and highlights its importance not only as a predictive biomarker but also as a potential target for therapeutic intervention. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Entities:
Keywords: head and neck neoplasms; immunotherapy; lymphocytes; metabolic networks and pathways; tumor microenvironment; tumor-infiltrating
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33986123 PMCID: PMC8126285 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 13.751
Figure 1Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade resistance leads to increased tumor cell oxidative metabolism and intratumoral hypoxia. (A) Schematic of PD-1 resistant murine head and neck cancer cell model, MEER cell line generation. (B) Growth curve and survival of C57/BL6 mice inoculated with parental or PD-1 resistant MEER cells intradermally then treated with 200 µg anti-PD-1 or isotype controls three times per week when tumors reached 1–3 mm. Tumor-free indicates a complete regression. Partial response (PR) indicates mice that showed tumor regression for at least two measurements. Each line represents one animal. (C) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) trace (left) and tabulated basal OCR (right) of parental and PD-1 resistant MEER cells. (D) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) trace (left) and tabulated basal ECAR (right) as in (C). (E) Schematic of imaging preformed on parental and PD-1 resistant MEER cells. (F) Pimonidazole, CD8, and DAPI staining of full tumor sections from mice bearing parental and PD-1 resistant MEER tumors. Scale bar, 500 µm. (G) Tabulated results of the internal hypoxyprobe area and intensity from mice as in (F). (H) CD8+ T cell counts normalized to tumor area from mice as in (F). (I) Ratio of CD8+ T cells and Foxp3+ T cells from mice as in (F). (J) Foxp3+ T cell counts normalized to tumor area from mice as in (F). Data represent two to three independent experiments. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001, ns not significant by ratio paired t-test (C, D) paired t-test (G–J), or logrank test (B). Error bars indicate SEM.
Figure 2Hypoxia is associated with poor clinical efficacy with Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade therapy in patients. (A) Representative immunofluorescence of pan cytokeratin (PanCK), carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), and CD8 at 20× magnification of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) patients treated with anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibodies (mAb). Scale bar, 200 µm comparing a patient with disease control (stable disease) to a patient with progression. (B) Tabulated results of percent area and mean intensity of CAIX (CAIX/I) within PanCK+ regions of FFPE sections from patients with HNSCC that progressed on (P) or had disease control (DC; defined as stable disease, partial or complete response) anti-PD-1 mAb. (C) Tabulated results of CD8+ T cell counts normalized to the PanCk+ area from patients as in (B). (D) Overall survival of patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb based on CAIX/I. (E) Progression free survival of patients as in (C). (F) Overall survival of patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb based on CD8+ T cell counts normalized to the PanCk area. (G) Progression free survival of patients as in (F). (H) Overall survival of patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb monotherapy based on combination of CAIX/I and CD8+ T cell counts. (I) Progression free survival of patients as in (H). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ns not significant. Error bars indicate SEM.
Univariate survival analysis
| Median (months) | 12 months (%) | HR/95% CI | P value | |
| CAIX/I* (low) | 4.2 | 22.2 | 1.8 (1.08 to 3.03) | 0.023 |
| CAIX/I (high) | 1.9 | 0 | Ref | |
| CD8† (low) | 1.9 | 5.6 | 0.79 (0.48 to 1.29) | 0.013 |
| CD8 (high) | 2.6 | 16.7 | Ref | |
| Low CAIX/I, low CD8 | 4.9 | 12.5 | Ref | 0.10 |
| Low CAIX/I, high CD8 | 3.6 | 30.0 | 0.82 (0.29 to 2.33) | |
| High CAIX/I, low CD8 | 1.4 | 0.0 | 2.64 (0.98 to 7.07) | |
| High CAIX/I, high CD8 | 2.6 | 0.0 | 1.64 (0.58 to 4.60) | |
| CAIX/I (low) | NR | 51.3 | 1.9 (1.02 to 3.49) | 0.036 |
| CAIX/I (high) | 8.1 | 14.1 | Ref | |
| CD8 (low) | 7.6 | 16.7 | 0.50 (0.26 to 0.94) | 0.006 |
| CD8 (high) | NR | 54.7 | Ref | |
| Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (low) | 8.0 | 24.0 | Ref | 0.05 |
| Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) (high) | 8.0 | 42.0 | 0.63 (0.27 to 1.49) | |
| CD8/Treg (low) | 7 | 18.0 | Ref | 0.035 |
| CD8/Treg (high) | 9 | 50.0 | 0.53 (0.29 to 0.97) | |
| Low CAIX/I, low CD8 | 7.6 | 25.0 | Ref | 0.02 |
| Low CAIX/I, high CD8 | NR | 77.8 | 0.20 (0.04 to 1.02) | |
| High CAIX/I, low CD8 | 7.5 | 10.0 | 1.56 (0.56 to 4.29) | |
| High CAIX/I, high CD8 | 8.3 | 20.0 | 0.97 (0.30 to 3.20) |
The table shows variables that were found to be significant in univariate analysis. All variables were dichotomized (high vs low).
*CAIX/I=per cent area of CAIX/intensity of CAIX dichotomized.
†CD8=CD8 T cells normalized to tumor area.
OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival.
Multivariate survival analysis
| HR | 95% CI for HR | P value | |
| Disease control rate* | |||
| CAIX/I | NA | NA | 0.028 |
| CD8 | NA | NA | 0.005 |
| PFS | |||
| CAIX/I† (high) | 1.71 | 1.03 to 2.84 | 0.04 |
| CD8‡ (high) | 0.08 | 0.006 to 1.131 | 0.02 |
| OS | |||
| CAIX/I (high) | 1.68 | 0.87 to 3.22 | 0.11 |
| CD8 (high) | 0.065 | 0.001 to 3.78 | 0.081 |
| Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) | 0.98 | 0.93 to 1.02 | 0.20 |
*Disease control rate=CR, PR, or SD.
†CAIX/I=per cent area of CAIX/intensity of CAIX dichotomized.
‡CD8=CD8 T cells normalized to tumor area. Only variables significant in univariate analysis were included in multivariate model.
OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival.