| Literature DB >> 35702611 |
Jiangchao Wu1,2,3, Xun Wang1,2,3, Li Chen4,5, Jianing Wang1,2,3, Junlei Zhang1,2,3, Jianghui Tang1,2,3, Yongtao Ji1,2,3, Jinyuan Song1,2,3, Lin Wang1,2,3, Yaxing Zhao1,2,3, Hui Zhang1,2,3, Taohong Li1,2,3, Jianpeng Sheng1,2,3, Dong Chen4,5, Qi Zhang1,2,3, Tingbo Liang1,2,3.
Abstract
Rationale: Hypoxia in tumor microenvironment (TME) represents an obstacle to the efficacy of immunotherapy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) through several aspects such as increasing the expression of immune checkpoints or promoting fibrosis. Reversing hypoxic TME is a potential strategy to improve the validity of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).Entities:
Keywords: Hypoxia; Oxygen microcapsules; PD-1; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Tumor microenvironment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35702611 PMCID: PMC9168385 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1Preparation and characterization of polydopamine-particle-stabilized oxygen microcapsules.
(A). A schematic diagram of the polymerization and cross-linking of polydopamine nanoparticles at the oxygen/water interface to form stable oxygen microcapsules.(B). The representative optical image of oxygen microcapsules stabilized by polydopamine particles. The scale bar was 20 μm (C). The representative SEM image of collapsed oxygen microcapsules stabilized by polydopamine particles. The scale bar was 1 μm. (D). Optical, fluorescent, and overlay images of polydopamine-nanoparticle-stabilized oxygen microcapsule. Polydopamine nanoparticles have fluorescent properties. The scale bars were 5 μm. (E). Size distribution of oxygen microcapsules stabilized by polydopamine particles. Data were presented as the mean ± SD.(F). Zeta potential of oxygen microcapsules stabilized by polydopamine particles. Data were presented as the mean ± SD.
Fig. 2Oxygen transport performance of polydopamine-particle-stabilized oxygen microcapsules
(A). Optical image of the stable oxygen microcapsule overtime. Oxygen microcapsules shrunk and collapsed after the release of oxygen. The scale bars were 50 μm. (B). The oxygen concentration was monitored over time after the addition of 1 ml, 2 ml, and 3 ml of oxygen microcapsule dispersion into 10 ml deoxygenated PBS buffer, respectively.(C). The oxygen concentration in the dispersion was monitored when the oxygen-saturated dispersion was placed in a nitrogen environment.
Fig. 3Oxygen microcapsules reversed the hypoxia condition in vitro and in vivo
(A). The distribution fluorescent intensity of KPC, Panc02 pancreatic cancer cell lines, and normal pancreas cell HPNE cultured from Con group, N–O2 group, L-O2 group, and O–O2 group. Con group: cells cultured in normoxic conditions without incubation with the hypoxia probe; N–O2 group: cells were cultured in normoxic conditions; L-O2 group: cells were treated with a low oxygen level (1% O2) in a hypoxic chamber; O–O2 group: cells were maintained in a hypoxic environment (1% O2) for 18 h followed with treatment with oxygen microcapsules. (B). The representative FACS plots of hypoxia in EpCAM + tumor cells from tumor-bearing mice in the C group and the O group.(C). The mean fluorescent intensity of EpCAM + tumor cells from tumor-bearing mice in the C group and the O group. **p < 0.01. (D). mRNA expression levels of HIF-1α in tumor samples obtained from orthotopic PDAC tumor model in C group and O group were quantified by quantitative qRT-PCR. (E). Protein expression levels of HIF-1α in tumor samples obtained from orthotopic PDAC tumor model in C group and O group were assessed by Western blot. (F–G). The representative images and further quantification of HIF-1α in tumor samples were obtained from the orthotopic PDAC tumor model in the C group and the O group. Scale bars: 200 × : 100 μm; 400 × : 25 μm. (H). Safety evaluation of mice from different groups. H&E staining micrographs of heart, liver, spleen, kidney, and lung from each group with various treatments. Scale bars: 100 × : 250 μm; 400 × : 50 μm.
Fig. 4Oxygen microcapsules enhanced the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in vivo.
(A). Therapeutic schedule of the various treatments for the tumor-bearing mice. (B). The morphology of the tumors in each group under different treatments (n = 5). (C). Weight of tumors from each group under various treatments. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5). (D–E). The representative images and further quantification of TUNEL positive cells in tumor samples obtained from orthotopic PDAC tumor model in each group under different treatments (Scale bars: 200 × : 100 μm; 400 × : 50 μm). (F–G). The representative images and further quantification of Ki67 positive cells in tumor samples were obtained from orthotopic PDAC tumor model in each group under different treatments (Scale bars: 200 × : 75 μm; 400 × : 50 μm).
Fig. 5Oxygen Microcapsules combined with anti-PD-1 therapy activated macrophage-mediated adaptive anti-tumor immunity
(A). Gating strategy of FACS analysis for detecting CD45+ cells, TAMs, M1 macrophages, and M2 macrophages in the TME from the tumor-bearing mice with different treatments. (B–E). Statistic results for the proportions of CD45+ cells, TAMs, M1 macrophages, M2 macrophages in the TME of each group. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5, per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 6Oxygen Microcapsules combined with anti-PD-1 activated T cell-mediated adaptive anti-tumor immunity
(A). Gating strategy of FACS analysis for detecting CTLs (Granzyme B + CD8+ T Cells) and Th1 cells (IFN-γ+ CD4+ T Cells) in the TME from the tumor-bearing mice with different treatments. (B–E). Statistic results for the proportions of CD8+ cells, CD4+ cells, CTLs (Granzyme B + CD8+ T Cells), and Th1 cells (IFN-γ+ CD4+ T Cells) in the TME of each group. Data were presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5, per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.