Literature DB >> 33985460

Time course of outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a longitudinal retrospective study.

Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian1, Daniela Diaferia2, Andrea Minini2, Narcisse Ndieugnou Djangang2, Marco Menozzi2, Lorenzo Peluso2, Filippo Annoni2, Jacques Creteur2, Sophie Schuind3, Olivier Dewitte3, Fabio Silvio Taccone2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurological outcome and mortality of patients suffering from poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) may have changed over time. Several factors, including patients' characteristics, the presence of hydrocephalus and intraparenchymal hematoma, might also contribute to this effect. The aim of this study was to assess the temporal changes in mortality and neurologic outcome in SAH patients and identify their predictors.
METHODS: We performed a single center retrospective cohort study from 2004 to 2018. All non-traumatic SAH patients with poor grade on admission (WFNS score of 4 or 5) who remained at least 24 h in the hospital were included. Time course was analyzed into four groups according to the years of admission (2004-2007; 2008-2011; 2012-2015 and 2016-2018).
RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were included in this study: 202 patients died (57 %) and 260 (74 %) had unfavorable neurological outcome (UO) at 3 months. Mortality tended to decrease in in 2008-2011 and 2016-2018 periods (HR 0.55 [0.34-0.89] and HR 0.33 [0.20-0.53], respectively, when compared to 2004-2007). The proportion of patients with UO remained high and did not vary significantly over time. Patients with WFNS 5 had higher mortality (68 % vs. 34 %, p = 0.001) and more frequent UO (83 % vs. 54 %, p = 0.001) than those with WFNS 4. In the multivariable analysis, WFNS 5 was independently associated with mortality (HR 2.12 [1.43-3.14]) and UO (OR 3.23 [1.67-6.25]). The presence of hydrocephalus was associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR 0.60 [0.43-0.84]).
CONCLUSIONS: Both hospital mortality and UO remained high in poor grade SAH patients. Patients with WFNS 5 on admission had worse prognosis than others; this should be taken into consideration for future clinical studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hydrocephalus; Intracranial hemorrhage; Mortality; Neurological outcome; Subarachnoid hemorrhage

Year:  2021        PMID: 33985460      PMCID: PMC8117582          DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02229-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Neurol        ISSN: 1471-2377            Impact factor:   2.474


  45 in total

1.  Prognosis and treatment of acute hydrocephalus following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  Jingjing Lu; Nan Ji; Zhonghua Yang; Xingquan Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.961

2.  A universal subarachnoid hemorrhage scale: report of a committee of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; C G Drake; W Hunt; N Kassell; K Sano; B Pertuiset; J C De Villiers
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Patients in poor neurological condition after subarachnoid hemorrhage: early management and long-term outcome.

Authors:  G Rordorf; C S Ogilvy; D R Gress; R M Crowell; I S Choi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Why Do Patients with Poor-Grade Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Die?

Authors:  Jantien Hoogmoed; Airton L de Oliveira Manoel; Bert A Coert; Thomas R Marotta; R Loch Macdonald; W Peter Vandertop; Dagmar Verbaan; Menno R Germans
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.104

5.  Preoperative prediction of long-term outcome in poor-grade aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  J Mocco; Evan R Ransom; Ricardo J Komotar; J Michael Schmidt; Robert R Sciacca; Stephan A Mayer; E Sander Connolly
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Subarachnoid hemorrhage and intracerebral hematoma: incidence, prognostic factors, and outcome.

Authors:  Erdem Güresir; Jürgen Beck; Hartmut Vatter; Matthias Setzer; Rüdiger Gerlach; Volker Seifert; Andreas Raabe
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Complications and outcome in a hospital population.

Authors:  A Hijdra; R Braakman; J van Gijn; M Vermeulen; H van Crevel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Prediction of outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: timing of clinical assessment.

Authors:  Carlina E van Donkelaar; Nicolaas A Bakker; Nic J G M Veeger; Maarten Uyttenboogaart; Jan D M Metzemaekers; Omid Eshghi; Aryan Mazuri; Mahrouz Foumani; Gert-Jan Luijckx; Rob J M Groen; J Marc C van Dijk
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Poor-Grade Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Factors Influencing Functional Outcome--A Single-Center Series.

Authors:  Patrick Schuss; Alexis Hadjiathanasiou; Valeri Borger; Christian Wispel; Hartmut Vatter; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.104

10.  Documentation of Improved Outcomes for Intracranial Aneurysm Management Over a 15-Year Interval.

Authors:  Michelle H Chua; Christoph J Griessenauer; Christopher J Stapleton; Lucy He; Ajith J Thomas; Christopher S Ogilvy
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  2 in total

1.  External ventricular drain use is associated with functional outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Sarah E Nelson; Jose I Suarez; Alexander Sigmon; Jun Hua; Casey Weiner; Haris I Sair; Robert D Stevens
Journal:  Neurol Res Pract       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Preoperative predictors of poor outcomes in Thai patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Punnarat Sirataranon; Pichayen Duangthongphon; Phumtham Limwattananon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.