Michelle H Chua1, Christoph J Griessenauer1, Christopher J Stapleton1, Lucy He1, Ajith J Thomas1, Christopher S Ogilvy2. 1. From the Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brain Aneurysm Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.H.C., C.J.G., L.H., A.J.T., C.S.O.); and Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (C.J.S.). 2. From the Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Brain Aneurysm Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (M.H.C., C.J.G., L.H., A.J.T., C.S.O.); and Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston (C.J.S.). cogilvy@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite rapid advancements in intracranial aneurysm management, there is no evidence as of yet that this has translated into improvement in overall prognosis. METHODS: We compared 2 periods of aneurysm management, 1998 to 2003 (n=1023 aneurysms) and 2007 to 2013 (n=1499 aneurysms), at a single, high-volume neurovascular center. Our outcome of interest was low or moderate disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 or 5) at 6 months or more post treatment. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in outcome for surgical, endovascular, and overall treatment of unruptured (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.33; P=0.0091; adjusted OR, 4.40; P=0.0271; and adjusted OR, 2.58; P=0.0008, respectively) and ruptured (adjusted OR, 3.18; P=0.0004; adjusted OR, 3.54; P=0.0001; and adjusted OR, 3.11; P<0.0001, respectively) aneurysms from the first to the second time period. In 2007 to 2013, the proportion of cases with low or moderate disability at 6 months post subarachnoid hemorrhage was 75.6% for surgical clipping and 76.6% for endovascular therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We report significantly improved outcomes over time for overall aneurysm management and for multiple patient subgroups, associated with increased usage of endovascular therapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Despite rapid advancements in intracranial aneurysm management, there is no evidence as of yet that this has translated into improvement in overall prognosis. METHODS: We compared 2 periods of aneurysm management, 1998 to 2003 (n=1023 aneurysms) and 2007 to 2013 (n=1499 aneurysms), at a single, high-volume neurovascular center. Our outcome of interest was low or moderate disability (Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 4 or 5) at 6 months or more post treatment. RESULTS: There were significant improvements in outcome for surgical, endovascular, and overall treatment of unruptured (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.33; P=0.0091; adjusted OR, 4.40; P=0.0271; and adjusted OR, 2.58; P=0.0008, respectively) and ruptured (adjusted OR, 3.18; P=0.0004; adjusted OR, 3.54; P=0.0001; and adjusted OR, 3.11; P<0.0001, respectively) aneurysms from the first to the second time period. In 2007 to 2013, the proportion of cases with low or moderate disability at 6 months post subarachnoid hemorrhage was 75.6% for surgical clipping and 76.6% for endovascular therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We report significantly improved outcomes over time for overall aneurysm management and for multiple patient subgroups, associated with increased usage of endovascular therapy.