Literature DB >> 27035175

Prediction of outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage: timing of clinical assessment.

Carlina E van Donkelaar1, Nicolaas A Bakker1,2, Nic J G M Veeger3, Maarten Uyttenboogaart4,5, Jan D M Metzemaekers1, Omid Eshghi5, Aryan Mazuri5, Mahrouz Foumani1, Gert-Jan Luijckx4, Rob J M Groen1, J Marc C van Dijk1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Currently, early prediction of outcome after spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) lacks accuracy despite multiple studies addressing this issue. The clinical condition of the patient on admission as assessed using the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) grading scale is currently considered the gold standard. However, the timing of the clinical assessment is subject to debate, as is the contribution of additional predictors. The aim of this study was to identify either the conventional WFNS grade on admission or the WFNS grade after neurological resuscitation (rWFNS) as the most accurate predictor of outcome after SAH. METHODS This prospective observational cohort study included 1620 consecutive patients with SAH admitted between January 1998 and December 2014 at our university neurovascular center. The primary outcome measure was a poor modified Rankin Scale score at the 2-month follow-up. Clinical predictors were identified using multivariate logistic regression analyses. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis was used to test discriminative performance of the final model. An AUC of > 0.8 was regarded as indicative of a model with good prognostic value. RESULTS Poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale Score 4-6) was observed in 25% of the patients. The rWFNS grade was a significantly stronger predictor of outcome than the admission WFNS grade. The rWFNS grade was significantly associated with poor outcome (p < 0.001) as well as increasing age (p < 0.001), higher modified Fisher grade (p < 0.001), larger aneurysm size (p < 0.001), and the presence of an intracerebral hematoma (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2-2.8; p = 0.002). The final model had an AUC of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.89), which indicates excellent prognostic value regarding the discrimination between poor and good outcome after SAH. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice and future research, neurological assessment and grading of patients should be performed using the rWFNS to obtain the best representation of their clinical condition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AUC = area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; CTA = CT angiography; DSA = digital subtraction angiography; SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; WFNS; WFNS = World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies; World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies; mFisher = modified Fisher Scale; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; prediction model; rWFNS = WFNS after neurological resuscitation; resuscitation; stroke; subarachnoid hemorrhage; vascular disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27035175     DOI: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152136

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  14 in total

1.  Time course of outcome in poor grade subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: a longitudinal retrospective study.

Authors:  Elisa Gouvêa Bogossian; Daniela Diaferia; Andrea Minini; Narcisse Ndieugnou Djangang; Marco Menozzi; Lorenzo Peluso; Filippo Annoni; Jacques Creteur; Sophie Schuind; Olivier Dewitte; Fabio Silvio Taccone
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.474

2.  Assessing Contribution of Higher Order Clinical Risk Factors to Prediction of Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients.

Authors:  Azade Tabaie; Shamim Nemati; Jason W Allen; Charlotte Chung; Flavia Queiroga; Won-Jun Kuk; Adam B Prater
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2020-03-04

3.  The effect of anaesthetic exposure in presurgical period on delayed cerebral ischaemia and neurological outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage undergoing clipping of aneurysm: A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Rajeeb K Mishra; Mihir P Pandia; Subodh Kumar; Gyaninder P Singh; M Kalaivani
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2020-06-01

4.  Predictors of Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage After Microsurgical Clipping.

Authors:  Ching-Hua Huang; Shih-Ying Ni; Hsueh-Yi Lu; Abel Po-Hao Huang; Lu-Ting Kuo
Journal:  Neurol Ther       Date:  2022-02-20

5.  D-dimer may predict poor outcomes in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Jun-Hui Liu; Xiang-Kui Li; Zhi-Biao Chen; Qiang Cai; Long Wang; Ying-Hu Ye; Qian-Xue Chen
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.135

Review 6.  Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in the Elderly over Age 75: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hiroki Ohkuma; Norihito Shimamura; Masato Naraoka; Takeshi Katagai
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Early Antiinflammatory Therapy Attenuates Brain Damage After Sah in Rats.

Authors:  Georg Vadokas; Stefan Koehler; Judith Weiland; Nadine Lilla; Christian Stetter; Thomas Westermaier
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 1.757

8.  Size, Aspect Ratio and Anatomic Location of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Consecutive Series of 415 Patients from a Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.

Authors:  Y Zheng; B Zhou; X Wang; H Chen; X Fang; P Jiang; H Yang; C He; G Yang; Y Song; Q An; B Leng
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Risk Factors for Unfavorable Outcome in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Revisited; Odds and Ends.

Authors:  Abdolkarim Rahmanian; Nima Derakhshan; Alireza Mohsenian Sisakht; Najme Karamzade Ziarati; Hadi Raeisi Shahraki; Soheil Motamed
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2018-04

10.  Easily Created Prediction Model Using Automated Artificial Intelligence Framework (Prediction One, Sony Network Communications Inc., Tokyo, Japan) for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcomes Treated by Coiling and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia.

Authors:  Masahito Katsuki; Shin Kawamura; Akihito Koh
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.