Literature DB >> 33980722

Electrical features, liquid composition and toxicant emissions from 'pod-mod'-like disposable electronic cigarettes.

Soha Talih1,2, Rola Salman1,2, Eric Soule3, Rachel El-Hage2,4, Ebrahim Karam1,2, Nareg Karaoghlanian1,2, Ahmad El-Hellani2,4, Najat Saliba2,4, Alan Shihadeh5,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Use of flavoured pod-mod-like disposable electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has grown rapidly, particularly among cost-sensitive youth and young adults. To date, little is known about their design characteristics and toxicant emissions. In this study, we analysed the electrical and chemical characteristics and nicotine and pulmonary toxicant emission profiles of five commonly available flavoured disposable e-cigarettes and compared these data with those of a JUUL, a cartridge-based e-cigarette device that pod-mod-like disposables emulate in size and shape.
METHODS: Device construction, electrical power and liquid composition were determined. Machine-generated aerosol emissions including particulate matter, nicotine, carbonyl compounds and heavy metals were also measured. Liquid and aerosol composition were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/flame ionisation detection, and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry.
RESULTS: We found that unlike JUUL, disposable devices did not incorporate a microcontroller to regulate electrical power to the heating coil. Quality of construction varied widely. Disposable e-cigarette power ranged between 5 and 9 W and liquid nicotine concentration ranged between 53 and 85 mg/mL (~95% in the protonated form). In 15 puffs, total nicotine yield for the disposables ranged between 1.6 and 6.7 mg, total carbonyls ranged between 28 and 138 µg, and total metals ranged between 1084 and 5804 ng. JUUL emissions were near the floors of all of these ranges.
CONCLUSIONS: Disposable e-cigarettes are designed with high nicotine concentration liquids and are capable of emitting much higher nicotine and carbonyl species relative to rechargeable look-alike e-cigarettes. These differences are likely due to the lower quality in construction, unreliable labelling and lack of temperature control regulation that limits the power during operation. From a public health perspective, regulating these devices is important to limit user exposure to carbonyls and nicotine, particularly because these devices are popular with youth and young adults. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogens; electronic nicotine delivery devices; non-cigarette tobacco products

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33980722      PMCID: PMC8586044          DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   6.953


  26 in total

1.  Characteristics and toxicant emissions of JUUL electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Soha Talih; Rola Salman; Rachel El-Hage; Ebrahim Karam; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El-Hellani; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 7.552

2.  The rise of disposable JUUL-type e-cigarette devices.

Authors:  Rebecca Williams
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Flavoring Compounds Dominate Toxic Aldehyde Production during E-Cigarette Vaping.

Authors:  Andrey Khlystov; Vera Samburova
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  The changing cigarette, 1950-1995.

Authors:  D Hoffmann; I Hoffmann
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health       Date:  1997-03

5.  Electronic Cigarette Sales in the United States, 2013-2017.

Authors:  Brian A King; Doris G Gammon; Kristy L Marynak; Todd Rogers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Electronic cigarettes: what are they and what do they do?

Authors:  Alison Breland; Eric Soule; Alexa Lopez; Carolina Ramôa; Ahmad El-Hellani; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2015.

Authors:  Elyse Phillips; Teresa W Wang; Corinne G Husten; Catherine G Corey; Benjamin J Apelberg; Ahmed Jamal; David M Homa; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 17.586

8.  Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2017.

Authors:  Teresa W Wang; Kat Asman; Andrea S Gentzke; Karen A Cullen; Enver Holder-Hayes; Carolyn Reyes-Guzman; Ahmed Jamal; Linda Neff; Brian A King
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 17.586

9.  A comparison of the electrical characteristics, liquid composition, and toxicant emissions of JUUL USA and JUUL UK e-cigarettes.

Authors:  Soha Talih; Rola Salman; Rachel El-Hage; Ebrahim Karam; Sally Salam; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El-Hellani; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Tobacco product use among adults--United States, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Brian A King; Corinne G Husten; Rebecca Bunnell; Bridget K Ambrose; S Sean Hu; Enver Holder-Hayes; Hannah R Day
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 17.586

View more
  5 in total

1.  Laboratory Determination of Gravimetric Correction Factors for Real-time Area Measurements of Electronic Cigarette Aerosols.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Jack Pender; Dillon Streuber; Meaghan Haley; Will Shingleton; Eric Soule
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 4.809

2.  Passive exposure to e-cigarette emissions is associated with worsened mental health.

Authors:  Kayla Rae Farrell; Michael Weitzman; Emma Karey; Teresa K Y Lai; Terry Gordon; Shu Xu
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.135

3.  E-cigarette device type and combustible tobacco use: Results from a pooled analysis of 10,482 youth.

Authors:  Grace Kong; Benjamin W Chaffee; Ran Wu; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin; Feifei Liu; Adam M Leventhal; Rob McConnell; Jessica Barrington-Trimis
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.852

4.  Disposable Puff Bar Electronic Cigarettes: Chemical Composition and Toxicity of E-liquids and a Synthetic Coolant.

Authors:  Esther E Omaiye; Wentai Luo; Kevin J McWhirter; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.973

5.  The Reshaping of the E-Cigarette Retail Environment: Its Evolution and Public Health Concerns.

Authors:  Carla J Berg; Albert Melena; Friedner D Wittman; Tomas Robles; Lisa Henriksen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.