Literature DB >> 35527743

Laboratory Determination of Gravimetric Correction Factors for Real-time Area Measurements of Electronic Cigarette Aerosols.

Sinan Sousan1,2, Jack Pender3, Dillon Streuber4, Meaghan Haley4, Will Shingleton4, Eric Soule4.   

Abstract

Research on secondhand electronic cigarette (ECIG) aerosol exposure using aerosol monitors has demonstrated that ECIG use can generate high concentrations of particulate matter (PM) and impact indoor air quality. However, quantifying indoor air PM concentrations using real-time optical monitors with on-site calibration specifically for different PM exposures has not been established. Therefore, the ECIG aerosol filter correction factors were calculated for different PM sizes (PM1, PM2.5, and PM10) and different aerosol optical monitors, the MiniWRAS, pDR, and SidePak. ECIG aerosol generation was achieved using five ECIGs representing three ECIG types, disposable, pod-mod, and box mod. The aerosol size distribution by mass was measured for the five ECIGs during PM generation. Compared to the discrete filter measurements, the MiniWRAS performed the best when the concentrations were low, followed by the pDR and SidePak. The average PM concentrations and correction factor ranges for the different ECIGs were 323-1,775 μg/m3 and 0.64-6.01 for the MiniWRAS, 1,388-13,365 μg/m3 and 0.41-0.80 for the pDR, and 4,632-55,339 μg/m3 and 0.13-0.20 for the SidePak, respectively. The mass median diameter ranged from 0.41 and 0.62 μm, and most particles generated from the ECIGs were smaller than 1 μm. This study demonstrates that aerosol size distribution varies between ECIGs. Likewise, the correction factors developed for the real-time aerosol monitors are specific to the ECIG used. Thus, these data can help improve ECIG aerosol exposure measurement accuracy.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35527743      PMCID: PMC9071016          DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2022.2047152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol        ISSN: 0278-6826            Impact factor:   4.809


  47 in total

1.  Does e-cigarette consumption cause passive vaping?

Authors:  T Schripp; D Markewitz; E Uhde; T Salthammer
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 2.  Particulate Matter from Electronic Cigarettes and Conventional Cigarettes: a Systematic Review and Observational Study.

Authors:  Esteve Fernández; Montse Ballbè; Xisca Sureda; Marcela Fu; Esteve Saltó; Jose M Martínez-Sánchez
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2015-12

3.  Hidden formaldehyde in e-cigarette aerosols.

Authors:  R Paul Jensen; Wentai Luo; James F Pankow; Robert M Strongin; David H Peyton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Assessment of indoor air quality at an electronic cigarette (Vaping) convention.

Authors:  Rui Chen; Angela Aherrera; Chineye Isichei; Pablo Olmedo; Stephanie Jarmul; Joanna E Cohen; Ana Navas-Acien; Ana M Rule
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Inter-comparison of Low-cost Sensors for Measuring the Mass Concentration of Occupational Aerosols.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Kirsten Koehler; Geb Thomas; Jae Hong Park; Michael Hillman; Andrew Halterman; Thomas M Peters
Journal:  Aerosol Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.908

6.  Passive exposure to pollutants from conventional cigarettes and new electronic smoking devices (IQOS, e-cigarette) in passenger cars.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schober; Ludwig Fembacher; Adela Frenzen; Hermann Fromme
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 5.840

7.  Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage.

Authors:  Leon Kosmider; Andrzej Sobczak; Maciej Fik; Jakub Knysak; Marzena Zaciera; Jolanta Kurek; Maciej Lukasz Goniewicz
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.244

8.  Electrical features, liquid composition and toxicant emissions from 'pod-mod'-like disposable electronic cigarettes.

Authors:  Soha Talih; Rola Salman; Eric Soule; Rachel El-Hage; Ebrahim Karam; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Ahmad El-Hellani; Najat Saliba; Alan Shihadeh
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.953

9.  Laboratory Evaluation of Low-Cost Optical Particle Counters for Environmental and Occupational Exposures.

Authors:  Sinan Sousan; Swastika Regmi; Yoo Min Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  The Health Risks of Electronic Cigarette Use to Bystanders.

Authors:  Wouter F Visser; Walther N Klerx; Hans W J M Cremers; Ramon Ramlal; Paul L Schwillens; Reinskje Talhout
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  1 in total

1.  Increased JUUL Emissions from Initial Puffs after Removing and Reinserting Pod.

Authors:  Eric K Soule; Sinan Sousan; Dillon Streuber; Sarah E Fresquez; Ronald Mooring; Rola Salman; Soha Talih; Jack Pender
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 3.973

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.