Literature DB >> 30745326

Characteristics and toxicant emissions of JUUL electronic cigarettes.

Soha Talih1, Rola Salman1, Rachel El-Hage2, Ebrahim Karam1, Nareg Karaoghlanian1, Ahmad El-Hellani2, Najat Saliba2, Alan Shihadeh1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: JUUL is an electronic cigarette (ECIG) with a compact form factor. It is prefilled with a liquid that is advertised to contain a high concentration of nicotine salt. JUUL commands 50% of the US ECIG market share, and its wide popularity with underage users has triggered unprecedented actions by the US FDA. Apart from its nicotine salt-containing liquid and compact form, a salient advertised design feature is a control circuit that limits the heating coil temperature, presumably reducing unwanted toxicants. In this study, several tobacco-flavoured JUUL devices were reverse engineered, and their aerosol emissions were studied.
METHODS: Total nicotine and its partitioning (freebase and protonated), propylene glycol/vegetable glycerin (PG/VG) ratio, and carbonyls were quantified by gas chromatography (GC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The temperature control functionality of JUUL was investigated using a temperature-controlled bath in which the coil was submerged.
RESULTS: The liquid nicotine concentration was found to be 69 mg/mL, and the liquid and aerosol PG/VG ratio was found to be 30/70. In 15 puffs, JUUL emitted 2.05 (0.08) mg of nicotine, overwhelmingly in the protonated form. Carbonyl yields were significantly lower than those reported for combustible cigarettes, but similar to other closed-system ECIG devices. The heating coil resistance was 1.6 (0.66) Ohm, while the maximum power delivered by the JUUL device was 8.1 W. The control circuit limited the peak operating temperature to approximately 215C.
CONCLUSIONS: JUUL emits a high-nicotine concentration aerosol predominantly in the protonated form. JUUL's nicotine-normalised formaldehyde and total aldehyde yields are lower than other previously studied ECIGs and combustible cigarettes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carcinogens; electronic nicotine delivery devices; nicotine

Year:  2019        PMID: 30745326     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  53 in total

1.  High-Nicotine Electronic Cigarette Products: Toxicity of JUUL Fluids and Aerosols Correlates Strongly with Nicotine and Some Flavor Chemical Concentrations.

Authors:  Esther E Omaiye; Kevin J McWhirter; Wentai Luo; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  What factors reliably predict electronic cigarette nicotine delivery?

Authors:  Melissa D Blank; Jennifer Pearson; Caroline O Cobb; Nicholas J Felicione; Marzena M Hiler; Tory R Spindle; Alison Breland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Pod-mod vs. conventional e-cigarettes: nicotine chemistry, pH, and health effects.

Authors:  Xuesi M Shao; Theodore C Friedman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-12-19

4.  What are the reasons that smokers reject ENDS? A national probability survey of U.S. Adult smokers, 2017-2018.

Authors:  Scott R Weaver; J Wesley Heath; David L Ashley; Jidong Huang; Terry F Pechacek; Michael P Eriksen
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  Youth and Young Adult Use of Pod-Based Electronic Cigarettes From 2015 to 2019: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stella Juhyun Lee; Vaughan W Rees; Noam Yossefy; Karen M Emmons; Andy S L Tan
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

Review 6.  E-cigarettes and their impact on health: from pharmacology to clinical implications.

Authors:  Andrzej Sobczak; Leon Kośmider; Bartosz Koszowski; Maciej Ł Goniewicz
Journal:  Pol Arch Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-10

7.  How and Why California Young Adults Are Using Different Brands of Pod-Type Electronic Cigarettes in 2019: Implications for Researchers and Regulators.

Authors:  Karma McKelvey; Bonnie Halpern-Felsher
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 5.012

Review 8.  What is the nicotine delivery profile of electronic cigarettes?

Authors:  Natalie Voos; Maciej L Goniewicz; Thomas Eissenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 6.648

9.  Acute effects of JUUL and IQOS in cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Sarah Maloney; Alisha Eversole; Melanie Crabtree; Eric Soule; Thomas Eissenberg; Alison Breland
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  JUUL and Combusted Cigarettes Comparably Impair Endothelial Function.

Authors:  Poonam Rao; Jiangtao Liu; Matthew L Springer
Journal:  Tob Regul Sci       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.