| Literature DB >> 33980154 |
Shihao He1, Ziqi Liu1, Yanchang Wei1, Ran Duan2, Zongsheng Xu2, Cai Zhang3, Li Yuan3, Tian Li3, Ning Ma1, Xin Lou4, Xiaoyuan Liu5, Rong Wang6,7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Asymptomatic Moyamoya disease (MMD) impairs hemodynamic and cognitive function. The relationship between these changes, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and network connectivity remains largely unknown. The aim of this study was to increase understanding of the relationship between CBF, functional networks, and neurocognition in adults with asymptomatic MMD. We compared CBF and functional status in 26 patients with MMD and 20 healthy controls using arterial spin labeling and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging sequences. At the same time, a detailed cognitive test was performed in 15 patients with no cerebral or lumen infarction who were selected by magnetic resonance imaging-T2 FLAIR screening.Entities:
Keywords: Asymptomatic; Brain network; Brain perfusion; Cerebral blood flow; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Moyamoya disease; Neurocognition
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33980154 PMCID: PMC8117595 DOI: 10.1186/s12868-021-00638-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Neurosci ISSN: 1471-2202 Impact factor: 3.288
Demographic characteristics and cognitive test scores in the two study groups
| MMD group ( | Control group ( | Effect size | Cohen’s d | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (M:F) | 10:05 | 13:07 | 0.918 | ||
| Age, years | 41.27 ± 10.36 | 48.95 ± 12.78 | 0.066 | − 0.31 | − 0.66 |
| Education, years | 10.53 ± 2.26 | 11.10 ± 3.82 | 0.588 | − 0.09 | − 0.18 |
| Neurocognition score | |||||
| SPM | 15.93 ± 6.94 | 21.45 ± 9.13 | 0.06 | − 0.32 | − 0.68 |
| ROT | 14.13 ± 7.28 | 18.15 ± 12.67 | 0.246 | − 0.19 | − 0.38 |
| VWM1 | 6.93 ± 1.58 | 7.60 ± 1.73 | 0.25 | − 0.20 | − 0.40 |
| VWM2 | 5.00 ± 1.56 | 6.20 ± 2.22 | 0.083 | − 0.29 | − 0.62 |
| SUB | 30.73 ± 11.52 | 40.70 ± 9.57 | 0.009 | − 0.43 | − 0.94 |
| COMSUB | 12.00 ± 6.09 | 19.60 ± 9.32 | 0.006 | − 0.43 | − 0.96 |
| WORDM | 54.87 ± 14.48 | 64.40 ± 12.22 | 0.042 | − 0.34 | − 0.71 |
| PICTM | 72.47 ± 6.97 | 73.90 ± 5.64 | 0.506 | − 0.11 | − 0.23 |
| Medical history, n (%) | |||||
| Hypertension | 4 (26.7) | 5 (25) | 0.911 | ||
| Diabetes mellitus | 2 (13.3) | 2 (10) | 0.759 | ||
| Smoking history | 3 (20) | 3 (15) | 0.698 | ||
| Alcohol consumer | 3 (20) | 2 (10) | 0.403 | ||
| Suzuki stage | |||||
| Left | |||||
| 1 | 3 (20) | ||||
| 2 | 5 (33.3) | ||||
| 3 | 5 (33.3) | ||||
| 4 | 1 (6.7) | ||||
| 5 | 1 (6.7) | ||||
| 6 | 0 | ||||
| Right | |||||
| 1 | 3 (20) | ||||
| 2 | 4 (26.7) | ||||
| 3 | 5 (33.3) | ||||
| 4 | 2 (13.3) | ||||
| 5 | 1 (6.7) | ||||
| 6 | 0 | ||||
The data are shown as the number (percentage) unless otherwise indicated. Mean values are presented with the standard deviation
F female, M male, MMD asymptomatic Moyamoya disease, SPM Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices, ROT Mental rotation, VWM1 Verbal working memory-forward digit span task, VWM2 Verbal working memory-backward digit span task, SUB simple subtraction, COMSUB complex subtraction, WORDM word-memory, PICTM picture-memory
Fig. 1Average relative cerebral blood flow in patients with asymptomatic Moyamoya disease and healthy control subjects. a Patients with asymptomatic Moyamoya disease. b Healthy control subjects. -54, -36, 18 and so on represent the layers of the brain in the coronal plane
Fig. 2Difference in cerebral blood flow between the two study groups. The schematic diagram shows perfusion defects at various anatomical levels of the brain. 12, 16, 20 and so on represent the layer of the brain in the coronal plane. Multiple comparison of correction using family-wise error correction at the mass level (voxel level, p = 0.001)
Difference in cerebral blood flow between the two study groups and their location
| MNI coordinate | Peak | Voxels, | AAL region | Voxels in brain region, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | ||||
| − 44 | 14 | 34 | 4.3066 | 505 | Precentral_L | 297 |
| Frontal_Inf_Oper_L | 144 | |||||
AAL Anatomical Automatic Labeling brain atlas, Frontal_Inf_Oper_L left inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part, MNI Montreal Neurological Institute, Precentral_L left precentral gyrus
Fig. 3Difference in executive control network between the study groups. The two-sample t-test was used to detect differences in the corresponding network components between the two groups. Only the right side of each concerned network component performs the network component using family-wise error correction at a significance level of 0.05
Differences in the executive control network between the two study groups and their location
| MNI coordinate | Voxels, | Peak | AAL region | Voxels in brain region, | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | ||||
| 0 | − 33 | 39 | 113 | 6.1324 | Cingulum_Post_L | 34 |
| − 30 | − 66 | 54 | 254 | 7.2053 | Parietal_Sup_L | 82 |
| Occipital_Sup_L | 64 | |||||
Cingulum_Post_L left posterior cingulate gyrus, Parietal_Sup_L left superior parietal gyrus, Occipital_Sup_L left superior occipital gyrus
Fig. 4Difference in degree centrality between the two study groups. The value of the color bar represents the corresponding t value. The threshold of the images was at p < 0.05, corrected by the false discovery rate at a significance level of 0.01
Differences in global attributes between the two study groups
| Control group | MMD group | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Assortativity | 0.086 ± 0.044 | 0.088 ± 0.036 | 0.879 |
| Hierarchy | 0.032 ± 0.037 | 0.027 ± 0.029 | 0.491 |
| Network efficiency | 0.243 ± 0.012 | 0.249 ± 0.009 | 0.118 |
| Synchronization | 0.001 ± 0.005 | 0.005 ± 0.006 | 0.037 |
| Small-worldness | 0.632 ± 0.108 | 0.678 ± 0.084 | 0.126 |
Values are shown as the number (percentage) of cases unless otherwise indicated. The mean values are presented with the standard deviation
MMD Moyamoya disease, SD standard deviation
Fig. 5Differences in functional connectivity between the two study groups. The value of the color bar represents the corresponding t value. r threshold = 0.16, corrected by the false discovery rate at a significance level of 0.01