Literature DB >> 31102706

Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.

Shabnam Behrangrad1, Maryam Zoghi2, Dawson Kidgell3, Shapour Jaberzadeh3.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have indicated that non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) of the cerebellum could modulate corticospinal excitability (CSE) in young healthy individuals. However, there is no systematic review and meta-analysis that clarifies the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. The aim of this study was to provide a meta-analytic summary of the effects of cerebellar NIBS on CSE. Seven search engines were used to identify any trial evaluating CSE before and after one session of cerebellar NIBS in healthy individuals up to June 2018. Twenty-six studies investigating the corticospinal responses following cerebellar NIBS were included. Meta-analysis was used to pool the findings from included studies. Effects were expressed as mean differences (MD) and the standard deviation (SD). Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. Meta-analysis found that paired associative stimulation (PAS) with 2 ms interval, a combination of PAS with 21.5 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with a frequency of < 5 Hz increase CSE (P PAS2 < 0.00001, P PAS21.5 +a-tDCS = 0.02, P rTMS = 0.04). However, continuous theta burst stimulation, a combination of PAS with 25 ms interval and anodal transcranial direct current stimulation, and PAS with a 6 ms interval decreased CSE (P PAS6 < 0.00001, P cTBS < 0.00001, P PAS25 +a-tDCS = 0.003). The results of this review show that cerebellar NIBS techniques are a promising tool for increasing CSE.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-invasive brain stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; cerebellum; corticospinal excitability; motor evoked potential; transcranial direct current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31102706     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.05.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  5 in total

Review 1.  Interactions Between Cerebellum and the Intracortical Excitatory Circuits of Motor Cortex: a Mini-Review.

Authors:  George M Opie; Wei-Yeh Liao; John G Semmler
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 3.847

2.  Cerebellar rTMS and PAS effectively induce cerebellar plasticity.

Authors:  Martje G Pauly; Annika Steinmeier; Christina Bolte; Feline Hamami; Elinor Tzvi; Alexander Münchau; Tobias Bäumer; Anne Weissbach
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The effects of concurrent bilateral anodal tDCS of primary motor cortex and cerebellum on corticospinal excitability: a randomized, double-blind sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Shabnam Behrangrad; Maryam Zoghi; Dawson Kidgell; Farshad Mansouri; Shapour Jaberzadeh
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Cerebellar transcranial current stimulation - An intraindividual comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Rebecca Herzog; Till M Berger; Martje G Pauly; Honghu Xue; Elmar Rueckert; Alexander Münchau; Tobias Bäumer; Anne Weissbach
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.152

5.  Long-Term Application of Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Does Not Improve Motor Learning in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Lidio Lima de Albuquerque; Milan Pantovic; Mitchell G Clingo; Katherine M Fischer; Sharon Jalene; Merrill R Landers; Zoltan Mari; Brach Poston
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.648

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.