Literature DB >> 11118062

K-ras codon 12 mutation induces higher level of resistance to apoptosis and predisposition to anchorage-independent growth than codon 13 mutation or proto-oncogene overexpression.

S Guerrero1, I Casanova, L Farré, A Mazo, G Capellà, R Mangues.   

Abstract

The position of the point mutation in the c-K-ras gene appears associated with different degrees of aggressiveness in human colorectal tumors. In addition, colon tumors carrying K-ras codon 12 mutations associate with lower levels of apoptosis than tumors lacking this mutation. To test the hypothesis of a distinct transforming capacity of different K-ras forms in an in vitro system, we generated stable transfectants of NIH3T3 cells expressing a plasmid containing K-ras mutated at codon 12 (K12) or at codon 13 (K13), or overexpressing the K-ras proto-oncogene (Kwt-oe). We evaluated changes in morphology, proliferative capacity, contact inhibition, and predisposition to apoptosis and anchorage-independent growth in K12, K13, and Kwt-oe transformants. In addition, we studied alterations in expression and/or activation of proteins that participate in signal transduction downstream of Ras or are involved in the regulation of apoptosis and cell-cell (E-cadherin and beta-catenin) and cell-substrate (focal adhesion kinase) interactions. We observed that K13 or Kwt-oe transformants died synchronically 24-48 h after reaching confluency. Their death was apoptotic. In contrast, K12 grew, forming bigger colonies with higher cell densities; and before reaching confluency, spontaneously formed spheroids and showed no sign of apoptosis. The enhanced resistance to apoptosis, loss of contact inhibition, and predisposition to anchorage-independent growth in the K12 transformants were associated with higher AKT/protein kinase B activation, bcl-2, E-cadherin, beta-catenin, and focal adhesion kinase overexpression, and RhoA underexpression, whereas the increased sensitivity of K13 or Kwt-oe transformants to apoptosis was associated with increased activation of the c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase 1 pathway. All transformants showed a similar overactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinases and levels of bax expression similar to the endogenous level. Therefore, in our in vitro model, the localization of the mutation in the K-ras gene predisposes to a different level of aggressiveness in the transforming phenotype. K12 may increase aggressiveness not by altering proliferative pathways, but by the differential regulation of K-Ras downstream pathways that lead to inhibition of apoptosis, enhanced loss of contact inhibition, and increased predisposition to anchorage-independent growth. These results offer a molecular explanation for the increased aggressiveness of the tumors with K-ras codon 12 mutations observed in the clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11118062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  97 in total

1.  KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in relation to disease-free survival in BRAF-wild-type stage III colon cancers from an adjuvant chemotherapy trial (N0147 alliance).

Authors:  Harry H Yoon; David Tougeron; Qian Shi; Steven R Alberts; Michelle R Mahoney; Garth D Nelson; Suresh G Nair; Stephen N Thibodeau; Richard M Goldberg; Daniel J Sargent; Frank A Sinicrope
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Markers of resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Walid Shaib; Reena Mahajan; Bassel El-Rayes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

3.  KRAS and BRAF gene mutations and DNA mismatch repair status in Chinese colorectal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Ju-Xiang Ye; Yan Liu; Yun Qin; Hao-Hao Zhong; Wei-Ning Yi; Xue-Ying Shi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  A Facile Method to Engineer Mutant Kras Alleles in an Isogenic Cell Background.

Authors:  Konstantin Budagyan; Jonathan Chernoff
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 5.  KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail.

Authors:  Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-09-12

6.  KRAS G13D Mutation and Sensitivity to Cetuximab or Panitumumab in a Colorectal Cancer Cell Line Model.

Authors:  Shalini Sree Kumar; Timothy J Price; Omar Mohyieldin; Matthew Borg; Amanda Townsend; Jennifer E Hardingham
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2014-01

7.  Mutations in specific codons of the KRAS oncogene are associated with variable resistance to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Marjun P Duldulao; Wendy Lee; Rebecca A Nelson; Wenyan Li; Zhenbin Chen; Joseph Kim; Julio Garcia-Aguilar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The prognostic and predictive value of KRAS oncogene substitutions in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Liza C Villaruz; Mark A Socinski; Diana E Cunningham; Simion I Chiosea; Timothy F Burns; Jill M Siegfried; Sanja Dacic
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  KRAS Exon 2 Mutations as Prognostic Indicators in Advanced Colorectal Cancer in Clinical Practice: A Mono-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Vincenzo Dadduzio; Michele Basso; Sabrina Rossi; Tonia Cenci; Sara Capodimonti; Antonia Strippoli; Armando Orlandi; Eleonora Cerchiaro; Giovanni Schinzari; Alessandra Cassano; Maurizio Martini; Carlo Barone
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.074

10.  Site-dependent differences in clinical, pathohistological, and molecular parameters in metastatic colon cancer.

Authors:  Christoph Wilmanns; Sandra Steinhauer; Joachim Grossmann; Günther Ruf
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 6.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.