Leigh B Waddell1, Samantha J Bryen1, Beryl B Cummings1, Adam Bournazos1, Frances J Evesson1, Himanshu Joshi1, Jamie L Marshall1, Taru Tukiainen1, Elise Valkanas1, Ben Weisburd1, Simon Sadedin1, Mark R Davis1, Fathimath Faiz1, Rebecca Gooding1, Sarah A Sandaradura1, Gina L O'Grady1, Michel C Tchan1, David R Mowat1, Emily C Oates1, Michelle A Farrar1, Hugo Sampaio1, Alan Ma1, Katherine Neas1, Min-Xia Wang1, Amanda Charlton1, Charles Chan1, Diane N Kenwright1, Nicole Graf1, Susan Arbuckle1, Nigel F Clarke1, Daniel G MacArthur1, Kristi J Jones1, Monkol Lek1, Sandra T Cooper1. 1. Kids Neuroscience Centre (L.B.W., S.J.B., A.B., F.J.E., H.J., S.A.S., G.L.O., E.C.O., N.F.C., K.J.J., S.T.C.), Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health (L.B.W., S.J.B., A.B., F.J.E., S.A.S., G.L.O., E.C.O., N.F.C., K.J.J., S.T.C.), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit (B.B.C., J.L.M., T.T., E.V., D.G.M., M.L.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Medical and Population Genetics (B.B.C., J.L.M., T.T., E.V., B.W., S.S., D.G.M., M.L.), and Center for Mendelian Genomics (B.B.C., J.L.M., E.V., B.W., S.S., D.G.M., M.L.), Broad Institute of MIT & Harvard, Cambridge, MA; Functional Neuromics (F.J.E., S.T.C.), Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute (S.S.), Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Diagnostic Genomics (M.R.D., F.F., R.G.), PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Nedlands, Australia; Department of Clinical Genetics (S.A.S., A.M., K.J.J.), Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Genetic Medicine (M.C.T.), Westmead Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; Discipline of Genomic Medicine (M.C.T., A.M.), Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Centre for Clinical Genetics (D.R.M.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health (D.R.M., M.A.F.), UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Australia; Department of Neurology (M.A.F., H.S.), Sydney Children's Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Clinical Genetics (A.M.), Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Genetic Health Service NZ (K.N.), Wellington, New Zealand; Neurology Laboratory (M.-X.W.), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Central Clinical School (M.-X.W.), Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; Anatomic Pathology (A.C., C.C., N.G., S.A.), The Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; Anatomic Pathologist (D.N.K.), Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand; and Harvard Medical School (D.G.M.), Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnostic utility of whole-genome sequencing and RNA studies in boys with suspected dystrophinopathy, for whom multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and exomic parallel sequencing failed to yield a genetic diagnosis, and to use remnant normal DMD splicing in 3 families to define critical levels of wild-type dystrophin bridging clinical spectrums of Duchenne to myalgia. METHODS: Exome, genome, and/or muscle RNA sequencing was performed for 7 males with elevated creatine kinase. PCR of muscle-derived complementary DNA (cDNA) studied consequences for DMD premessenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing. Quantitative Western blot was used to determine levels of dystrophin, relative to control muscle. RESULTS: Splice-altering intronic single nucleotide variants or structural rearrangements in DMD were identified in all 7 families. Four individuals, with abnormal splicing causing a premature stop codon and nonsense-mediated decay, expressed remnant levels of normally spliced DMD mRNA. Quantitative Western blot enabled correlation of wild-type dystrophin and clinical severity, with 0%-5% dystrophin conferring a Duchenne phenotype, 10% ± 2% a Becker phenotype, and 15% ± 2% dystrophin associated with myalgia without manifesting weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-genome sequencing relied heavily on RNA studies to identify DMD splice-altering variants. Short-read RNA sequencing was regularly confounded by the effectiveness of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and low read depth of the giant DMD mRNA. PCR of muscle cDNA provided a simple, yet informative approach. Highly relevant to genetic therapies for dystrophinopathies, our data align strongly with previous studies of mutant dystrophin in Becker muscular dystrophy, with the collective conclusion that a fractional increase in levels of normal dystrophin between 5% and 20% is clinically significant.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the diagnostic utility of whole-genome sequencing and RNA studies in boys with suspected dystrophinopathy, for whom multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and exomic parallel sequencing failed to yield a genetic diagnosis, and to use remnant normal DMD splicing in 3 families to define critical levels of wild-type dystrophin bridging clinical spectrums of Duchenne to myalgia. METHODS: Exome, genome, and/or muscle RNA sequencing was performed for 7 males with elevated creatine kinase. PCR of muscle-derived complementary DNA (cDNA) studied consequences for DMD premessenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing. Quantitative Western blot was used to determine levels of dystrophin, relative to control muscle. RESULTS: Splice-altering intronic single nucleotide variants or structural rearrangements in DMD were identified in all 7 families. Four individuals, with abnormal splicing causing a premature stop codon and nonsense-mediated decay, expressed remnant levels of normally spliced DMD mRNA. Quantitative Western blot enabled correlation of wild-type dystrophin and clinical severity, with 0%-5% dystrophin conferring a Duchenne phenotype, 10% ± 2% a Becker phenotype, and 15% ± 2% dystrophin associated with myalgia without manifesting weakness. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-genome sequencing relied heavily on RNA studies to identify DMD splice-altering variants. Short-read RNA sequencing was regularly confounded by the effectiveness of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and low read depth of the giant DMD mRNA. PCR of muscle cDNA provided a simple, yet informative approach. Highly relevant to genetic therapies for dystrophinopathies, our data align strongly with previous studies of mutant dystrophin in Becker muscular dystrophy, with the collective conclusion that a fractional increase in levels of normal dystrophin between 5% and 20% is clinically significant.
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe X-linked disorder primarily affecting
approximately 1 in 5,000 male births.[1-3] DMD shows a relentlessly progressive course, resulting in loss of
ambulation in teens, and early mortality due to cardiac or respiratory
involvement.[4,5] Dystrophinopathies range clinically from the severe DMD
to asymptomatic hyperCKemia.[5-12] DMD is associated with the absence of dystrophin in
muscle due to loss-of-function variants in the DMD gene encoding
dystrophin,[5,6] whereas Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) is associated
with variants in DMD that result in reduced levels of (mutated)
dystrophin.[5,6]The DMD gene is the largest gene in the human genome, with numerous
enormous introns.[13,14] One-third of pathogenic DMD variants
are de novo,[15,16] with most affected individuals bearing insertions or
deletions (indels) of coding exons.[15,17] Pathogenic DMD
missense variants are rare,[6,15,18] and noncoding variants are emerging as an important rare cause of
dystrophinopathy.[15,17,19,20] Approximately 5% of
patients clinically diagnosed with DMD do not have a genetic diagnosis after mutational
analysis.[5]Herein, we show the diagnostic application of whole-genome sequencing, transcriptomics,
and dystrophin protein biochemistry to secure a genetic diagnosis for 13 affected males
from 7 families with elevated creatine kinase (CK) who remained undiagnosed following
multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and exomic sequencing.
Importantly, we identify 3 families with DMD splicing variants who
produce varying levels of mis-spliced transcripts that encode a premature stop codon and
are targeted by nonsense-mediated decay, though express varying levels of remnant,
normally spliced DMD mRNA. Therefore, quantitative Western blot (WB) of
muscle biopsy specimens from these 3 dystrophin hypomorphs has uniquely enabled specific
correlation of levels of wild-type (WT) dystrophin with clinical severity.
Methods
Standard Protocol Approvals, Registrations, and Patient Consents
This study was approved by the Children's Hospital at Westmead Human
Research Ethics Committee (Biospecimen Bank_10/CHW/45) with informed, written
consent from all participants.We describe a retrospective cohort of boys diagnosed with DMD
variants from genomic and RNA studies, who had elevated CK and dystrophic muscle
biopsies, and were undiagnosed after MLPA and exomic parallel sequencing.
Immunohistochemistry and Western Blotting
Immunohistochemistry[21] and
Western blotting[22] were
performed as previously described; WB used NuPAGE 3%–8% Tris-Acetate
precast gels (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific, NSW, Australia).
Antibodies: for immunohistochemistry, muscle fiber membranes were stained with
anti-dystrophin DYS1, DYS2, DYS3, and anti-spectrin SPEC1 (Leica Biosystems,
VIC, Australia); with anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 secondary antibody, membranes
were counterstained with wheat germ agglutinin-AF488 (WGA), and nuclei were
stained with DAPI (Invitrogen Thermo Fisher Scientific). WBs were probed with
DYS1 (Leica Biosystems), rabbit polyclonal dystrophin antibody (Rb-DMD; ab15277;
Abcam), α-actinin-2 (4A3, gift from A. Beggs, Children's Hospital
Boston, Boston, MA), sarcomeric actin (clone 5C5, A2172; Sigma-Aldrich), and the
anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG light chain HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies
(GE Healthcare, NSW, Australia). The rabbit polyclonal dystrophin antibody
(Rb-DMD; ab15277; Abcam) detects a 10-fold serial dilution, whereas DYS2 is less
sensitive (detects a 4-fold serial dilution). Therefore, ab15277 was selected
due to provision of a more informative standard curve for semiquantification of
dystrophin levels in the probands. ImageJ[23] was used to measure the densities of the patient and
serially diluted controls bands to create a standard curve, as previously
described.[19]
Semiquantitation of dystrophin levels was performed by comparing densities of
the dystrophin band in patient sample relative to the standard curves of
dystrophin in 2 age- and sex-matched controls across 3 experimental
replicates.
Massively Parallel Sequencing
Whole-exome sequencing (probands and AI:1, AI:2, and AII:2), PCR-free
whole-genome sequencing (probands from families A and B, D–G), and RNA
sequencing (RNA-seq; probands from families A, B, D, E, and G) were performed at
the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT as previously described.[20] RNA-seq was performed for
CII:2 at PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA as previously described for the fetal
samples in reference 24.
Sanger Sequencing and RT-PCR
RNA was extracted, and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) was performed as
previously described.[25]
Primers used for AII:1 have been previously described.[20] The remaining primer details are as follows:
Ex42F 5′-CAATGCTCCTGACCTCTGTG-3′; Ex43/44R
5′-CTGTCAAATCGCCCTTGTCG-3′; LINC00251Ex3R
5′-CTGAAATGGGTGGGATGAAG-3′; LINC00251Ex2F
5′-GATGCCCCTTAACCAAGGAC-3′; Ex26F
5′-GATGCACGAATGGATGACAC-3′; Ex27R
5′-TGTGCTACAGGTGGAGCTTG-3′; Ex26/27F
5′-GCAGTTGAAGAGATGAAGAGAGC-3′; Ex29R
5′-TGGGTTATCCTCTGAATGTCG-3′; In26PF
5′-AAA-CTTAGTTCGGCCCCATG-3′; Ex48F
5′-GTTAAATCATCTGCTGCTGTGG-3′; Ex54R
5′-ACTGGCGGAGGTCTTTGG-3′; Ex49/52F
5′-ACTCAGCCAGTGA-AGGCAAC-3′; Ex53R
5′-TCCTAAGACCTGCTCAGCT-TC-3′; Ex51F
5′-CGACTGGCTTTCTCTGCTTG-3′; Ex50/52F
5′-CAAATCCTGCATTGTTGCAGG-3′; GAPDHEx3F
5′-TCACCAGGGCTGCTTTTAAC-3′; and GAPDHEx6R
5′-GGCAGAGATGATGACCCTTT-3′. Confirmation and segregation analysis
of DMD variants was performed by Sanger sequencing,[21] except for family F in which
DNA was not available. Primers used for families A, D, E, and G have been
previously described.[20] The
remaining primer details are as follows: family B—In43F
5′-TTTAGTTTCCAGCCACTCCTGTC-3′ with chr8R
5′-TAGCAGGGGCAAGG-GTTG-3′ and chr8F
5′-TGCCTCTCCAGAATGAGGAC-3′ with In43R
5′-CGGGGAACATCACACACC-3′ to confirm insertion breakpoints; family
C—In26F 5′-CGAAGGAAAC-TGGTATGTAG-3′ with In26R
5′-AAAGCCGTATGACAGATTCG-3′ to determine causative variant. PCR
conditions were 5 minutes 95°C; 35 cycles—30 seconds 95°C, 30
seconds 58°C, and 1 minute 72°C; 8 minutes 72°C; or as described
in reference 20.
Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis
PCR-Free whole-genome sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq X Ten using 2
× 150 paired end reads at 30× mean coverage. The sequencing reads were
aligned to the GRCh37 genome reference and single nucleotide variants (SNVs),
small insertions and deletions (indels) were detected using methods previously
described in reference 20. A reanalysis
of rare (Genome Aggregation Database [gnomAD] AF < 0.005) SNVs and indels
revealed no pathogenic DMD variants. The Manta tool from
Illumina (PMID: 26647377) was used to identify structural variants or split read
abnormalities within the DMD gene. Putative structural variants
were manually inspected within Integrative Genomic Browser (IGV) to validate and
resolve exact breakpoints of structural rearrangements.
RNA-seq Analysis
RNA-seq analysis was performed as described in reference 20. Briefly, all samples were jointly processed and
aligned with the Genotype-Tissue Expression Consortium (GTEx)[26] to identify spliced reads only
seen in patients or groups of patients and missing in controls. In addition,
given the nature of the previously suspected diagnosis of a dystrophinopathy, in
cases in which this approach did not lead to a diagnosis, exonic read depth was
mapped in each patient and compared with controls and sashimi plots of patients
were manually inspected using the IGV for the DMD gene. In
cases, in which RNA-seq identified a mis-splicing event, patient exome and
genomes were manually evaluated, depending on availability.
Data Availability
Data not published within this article are available by request from any
qualified investigator.
Results
Clinical Presentation
Four families have been described previously in reference 20: AII:1 as N33; DII:1 as C3; EII:1 as C4; and GII:1 as
C2. Clinical presentation, DMD variants, and dystrophin WB
results are summarized in the table.
Briefly, AII:1 presented at 15 years with muscle pain, fatigue, and episodes of
myoglobinuria with exercise and elevated serum CK (CK 1,400–7,500 U/L,
normal range <200 U/L). He has 2 affected brothers with myalgia and
elevated serum CK (300–14,700 U/L (figure
1A). Family B is a 4-generation family with an X-linked muscular
dystrophy with cardiomyopathy. BIII:2 was diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy
in his 20s, underwent cardiac transplantation at age 29 years, and died of
transplant-related complications at age 31 years. BIII:7 was diagnosed with BMD
in his mid-teens. He has no known history of cardiomyopathy and remains ambulant
in his 40s (figure 1B). BIV:1 showed
elevated serum CK 9,964 U/L at age 6 months. Now age 5 years, he has proximal
muscle weakness, bilateral calf hypertrophy, and normal echocardiogram. CII:2
presented at age 9 years with progressive limb-girdle weakness, requiring
intermittent use of a wheelchair from age 13 years and nocturnal bilateral
positive airway pressure (BiPAP) from age 28 years. He has normal cardiac
function with serum CK of 420 U/L at age 31 years (figure 1C). DII:1 presented at age 3.5 years with proximal weakness,
calf hypertrophy, positive Gowers sign, and serum CK of 14,500 U/L. He required
use of a wheelchair from age 13 years. Echocardiogram at age 17 years showed
reduced contractility (ejection fraction 30%–35%) with normal left
ventricle size (figure 1D). EII:1 presented
at age 6 years with muscle weakness, enlarged calves, and serum CK of 18,889
U/L. He required use of a wheelchair at age 9 years and has no known cardiac or
respiratory involvement. EII:1 has a similarly affected brother (figure 1E). FII:6 presented at age 3.5 years
with proximal muscle weakness, positive Gowers sign, prominent calves, and serum
CK of 24,000 U/L. He remains ambulant, but is toe walking at age 9 years. He has
no known cardiac or respiratory involvement. FII:6's mother (FI:6) reports
muscle pain and has elevated serum CK of ∼500 U/L (figure 1F). GII:1 presented at age 5 years with waddling
gait, calf hypertrophy, positive Gowers sign, and serum CK levels of
>12,000 U/L. He required use of a wheelchair from age 7 years.
Echocardiogram at age 9 years showed borderline increase in heart size, and he
died at age 10 years from cardiac complications (figure 1G).
Table
Clinical Presentation, DMD Variants, and Dystrophin
Western Blot
Figure 1
Pedigree of Families A–G
Index patient for each family denoted with black arrow. Affected members
colored in red, and carriers part colored in red.
Clinical Presentation, DMD Variants, and Dystrophin
Western Blot
Pedigree of Families A–G
Index patient for each family denoted with black arrow. Affected members
colored in red, and carriers part colored in red.
DMD Diagnostic Genetic Testing
DMD MLPA and Sanger sequencing were performed and reported
normal for AII:1, BIV:1, CII:2, DII:1, EII:1, and GII:1. DMD
MLPA performed for FII:6 revealed duplications of exons 31–37 and
43–44, which were predicted to be in-frame and therefore considered
inconsistent with his severe Duchenne-like phenotype, though with high clinical
suspicion of causality. A genetic basis could not be identified via whole-exome
sequencing (AII:1, BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and GII:1, with duplications of
exons 31–37 and 43–44 confirmed for FII:6) or massively parallel
sequencing of a targeted neuromuscular gene panel (CII:2).
Immunohistochemistry Demonstrates Dystrophin Abnormalities in Skeletal Muscle
Biopsies
Skeletal muscle immunohistochemistry for AII:1, BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and
GII:1 confirms abnormalities in dystrophin (figure e-1, links.lww.com/NXG/A367). Using 3 anti-dystrophin antibodies, AII:1
and BIV:1 showed reduced dystrophin staining, whereas DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and
GII:1 showed absent staining (figure e-1 absent dystrophin staining shown only
for GII:1). WGA outlines the myofibers and labels the endomysium in patient and
control skeletal muscle samples.
Correlation of Splicing Analyses With Whole-Genome Sequencing Identifies
Pathogenic Intronic and Structural Variants Inducing Abnormal
DMD Splicing
Six individuals (AII:1, BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and GII:1) were subject to
whole-genome sequencing, 6 individuals were subject to RNA-seq (AII:1, BIV:1,
CII:2, DII:1, EII:1, and GII:1), and 4 individuals (AII:1, BIV:1, CII:2, and
DII:1) were analyzed by RT-PCR of muscle-derived mRNA. Scrutiny of
DMD transcripts (NM_004006.2, 11,058 nucleotides [nt] in
length) shows typical 3′ bias in read depth (vastly more reads at the
3′ end compared with the 5′ end of DMD
transcripts). Acknowledging 3′ bias, an abnormal profile of
DMD transcript read depth was apparent for BIV:1, DII:1,
EII:1, and GII:1 (figure 2A), relative to
multiple muscle controls from the GTEx consortium.[26]
Figure 2
Muscle RNA Studies of DMD in Patients
(A) RNA-seq read coverage of DMD exons in muscle RNA
from AII:1, BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, and GII:1 and 2 GTEx controls. Red
arrows indicate the reduction in read depth, which corresponds with the
location of DMD structural variants for BIV:1, DII:1,
EII:1, and GII:1. (B–G) RT-PCR studies of muscle-derived RNA of
patients with splicing abnormalities and 3 male controls (C1,
quadriceps, 6.5 years; C2, vastus lateralis, 17 years; C3, unknown, 20
years). Primers used are listed at the bottom right of each gel image
and are labeled according to their location (exon; Ex, intron; In,
pseudoexon; P) and orientation (forward; F, reverse; R). Bridging
primers span a splice junction and are denoted by X/Y, where X and Y are
exons the primer spans. All results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
(B) RT-PCR showing reduced levels of correctly spliced
DMD transcript (exons 43 and 44) in AII:1 and BIV:1
compared with controls. AII:1 shows the inclusion of a 128-bp
pseudoexon. (C) Primers specific to the 128 bp pseudoexon revealed that
the inclusion is specific to AII:1 (Sanger sequencing showed that the
faint bands in C1 were non-DMD sequences). Sequencing
reveals that faint bands in AII:1 correspond to multiple pseudoexons in
DMD incorporated into a minority of
DMD transcripts. (D) Various chr8 pseudoexons and
LINC00251 exons are included in
DMD transcripts as a result of the chr8 insertion
in BIV:1. The lowest band detected in all samples in the top gel
corresponds to non-DMD sequences. (E) RT-PCR confirms
the inclusion of a 84-bp pseudoexon in CII:2 in the majority of
DMD transcripts. Normal splicing can only be
detected in very low levels in CII:2 by bridging primers. The 92 bp
pseudoexon is absent in control samples. (F) RT-PCR of DII:1 confirms
that exon 51 is absent from all DMD transcripts. A
bridging primer indicates that skipping of both exons 50 and 51 is a low
frequency event observed in both controls and DII:1. (G)
GAPDH loading controls to indicate that similar
concentrations of complementary DNA were used for both control and
patient samples. DMD = Duchenne muscular dystrophy;
DMD = DMD gene or transcript;
RT-PCR = reverse transcription PCR.
Muscle RNA Studies of DMD in Patients
(A) RNA-seq read coverage of DMD exons in muscle RNA
from AII:1, BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, and GII:1 and 2 GTEx controls. Red
arrows indicate the reduction in read depth, which corresponds with the
location of DMD structural variants for BIV:1, DII:1,
EII:1, and GII:1. (B–G) RT-PCR studies of muscle-derived RNA of
patients with splicing abnormalities and 3 male controls (C1,
quadriceps, 6.5 years; C2, vastus lateralis, 17 years; C3, unknown, 20
years). Primers used are listed at the bottom right of each gel image
and are labeled according to their location (exon; Ex, intron; In,
pseudoexon; P) and orientation (forward; F, reverse; R). Bridging
primers span a splice junction and are denoted by X/Y, where X and Y are
exons the primer spans. All results were confirmed by Sanger sequencing.
(B) RT-PCR showing reduced levels of correctly spliced
DMD transcript (exons 43 and 44) in AII:1 and BIV:1
compared with controls. AII:1 shows the inclusion of a 128-bp
pseudoexon. (C) Primers specific to the 128 bp pseudoexon revealed that
the inclusion is specific to AII:1 (Sanger sequencing showed that the
faint bands in C1 were non-DMD sequences). Sequencing
reveals that faint bands in AII:1 correspond to multiple pseudoexons in
DMD incorporated into a minority of
DMD transcripts. (D) Various chr8 pseudoexons and
LINC00251 exons are included in
DMD transcripts as a result of the chr8 insertion
in BIV:1. The lowest band detected in all samples in the top gel
corresponds to non-DMD sequences. (E) RT-PCR confirms
the inclusion of a 84-bp pseudoexon in CII:2 in the majority of
DMD transcripts. Normal splicing can only be
detected in very low levels in CII:2 by bridging primers. The 92 bp
pseudoexon is absent in control samples. (F) RT-PCR of DII:1 confirms
that exon 51 is absent from all DMD transcripts. A
bridging primer indicates that skipping of both exons 50 and 51 is a low
frequency event observed in both controls and DII:1. (G)
GAPDH loading controls to indicate that similar
concentrations of complementary DNA were used for both control and
patient samples. DMD = Duchenne muscular dystrophy;
DMD = DMD gene or transcript;
RT-PCR = reverse transcription PCR.Standard variant filtering approaches of genomic sequencing failed to identify
most causal variants. RNA-seq identified abnormal pseudoexon inclusion into
DMD transcripts for families A and C. The remaining
pathogenic variants were identified only through the combination of whole-genome
sequencing, bioinformatics, and RNA analyses.A genetic diagnosis in AII:1 was identified in a previous study[20] with a deep intronic
pathogenic variant GRCh37:ChrX:32274692G>A; c.6290+30954C>T
inducing partial mis-splicing of DMD. The DMD
c.6290+30954C>T variant creates a cryptic donor 5′ splice site
resulting in inclusion of a variant-activated pseudoexon of 128 nt inserted
between exon 43 and exon 44, which encodes 59 missense amino acids and effects a
frameshift, resulting in a premature termination codon encoded by exon 44 (figure 3A). RT-PCR confirmed abnormal
inclusion of the variant-activated pseudoexon and residual normal splicing of
DMD exons 42-43-44-45 (figure
2, B and C).
Figure 3
Schematics of Variants Identified in Families A–G
(A) Family A: intronic c.6290+30954C>T (black arrow) creates a
cryptic donor splice site, leading to inclusion of a 128-bp pseudoexon
(red, within DMD intron 43) into the
DMD mRNA, causing a frameshift and stop codon (red
arrow) encoded by exon 44 (ex44). Gene direction is demonstrated by gray
arrows. Reading frame between exons is shown by shape complementarity.
(B) Family B: insertion of 116,284 bp of chr8 (red sequence) into
DMD intron 43. The insertion includes LINC00251
exons 1–3 (black outlined exons). A 124-bp sequence of intron 43
of DMD (chrX:32,276,895-32,277,018) is duplicated as
part of the structural rearrangement and now flanks the chr8 insertion.
In addition, there is an insertion of 13 bp (insGCCTTTGCCCACA, shown in
green) adjacent to 1 copy of the 124-bp duplication. mRNA studies show
evidence for numerous, different abnormal splicing events from
DMD exon 43 to various pseudoexons (red exons) and
LINC00251 exons (red exons with black outlines) within the chr8
insertion. Low levels of normal DMD splicing (from
exons 43 and 44; blue exons) are also observed. Frame of splicing in
pseudoexons and LINC00251 exons not shown. (C) Family C: intronic
c.3603+820G>T (black arrow) increases the strength of the
polypyrimidine tract leading to use of a cryptic acceptor splice site
(3/5 algorithms within Alamut Visual biosoftware predictions;
MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) leading to inclusion of a 84-bp
pseudoexon (red, within DMD intron 26) into the
DMD mRNA, encoding a stop codon (red arrow) 39
nucleotides into the pseudoexon. Gene direction is demonstrated by gray
arrows. Reading frame between exons is shown by shape complementarity.
(D) Family D: inversion of DMD exon 51 and flanking
adjacent intronic sequence. Flanking the structural rearrangement are 2
intronic deletions (orange 3.5 kb and purple 44 bp) and an insertion of
CCAATA (green). mRNA studies show exon 51 skipping, causing a frameshift
and a premature stop codon (TAG, encoded by exon 52; red arrow). (E)
Family E: A 2.6-Mb inversion on the X chromosome between 2 breakpoints;
A in intron 45 of CFAP47, 1.9 Mb upstream of exon 1 of
DMD (GRCh37:chrX:35,180,364) and B in intron 18 of
DMD (GRCh37:chrX:32,521,892, NM_004006.2). This
reverses the orientation of exons 1–18 of DMD,
which are now joined to CFAP47 sequences upstream of
exon. The DMD gene is in blue, exons dark blue, and
introns light blue. Intergenic sequence (non-DMD ChrX
in green). (F) Family F: A 4.1-Mb inversion on the X chromosome between
2 breakpoints; A is 3.8 Mb upstream of exon 1 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:36236087) and B in intron 44 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:32122714). This reverses the orientation of exons
1–44 of DMD, which are now joined to intergenic
sequence upstream of exon 1. This is accompanied by duplication of exons
31–37 (orange) and exons 43 and 44 (purple) around the
breakpoint. (G) Family G: A 119.8-Mb inversion on the X chromosome
between 2 breakpoints; A in an intergenic region on the q arm of the X
chromosome, 118 Mb upstream of exon 1 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:151,194,962), and B in intron 60 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:31,379,010, NM_004006.2). This reverses the orientation of
exons 1–60 of DMD, which are now joined to
intergenic sequence upstream of exon 1. In addition, 2 deletions were
identified at these breakpoints; an intronic 63 bp deletion (orange,
GRCh37:chrX:31,378,947-31,379,009) and an intergenic 18 bp deletion
(purple, GRCh37:chrX:151,194,963-151,194,980). X chromosome displayed in
unusual orientation with q arm to the left, so the DMD
gene is presented with exons in order. DMD =
DMD gene or transcript. mRNA = messenger
RNA.
Schematics of Variants Identified in Families A–G
(A) Family A: intronic c.6290+30954C>T (black arrow) creates a
cryptic donor splice site, leading to inclusion of a 128-bp pseudoexon
(red, within DMD intron 43) into the
DMD mRNA, causing a frameshift and stop codon (red
arrow) encoded by exon 44 (ex44). Gene direction is demonstrated by gray
arrows. Reading frame between exons is shown by shape complementarity.
(B) Family B: insertion of 116,284 bp of chr8 (red sequence) into
DMD intron 43. The insertion includes LINC00251
exons 1–3 (black outlined exons). A 124-bp sequence of intron 43
of DMD (chrX:32,276,895-32,277,018) is duplicated as
part of the structural rearrangement and now flanks the chr8 insertion.
In addition, there is an insertion of 13 bp (insGCCTTTGCCCACA, shown in
green) adjacent to 1 copy of the 124-bp duplication. mRNA studies show
evidence for numerous, different abnormal splicing events from
DMD exon 43 to various pseudoexons (red exons) and
LINC00251 exons (red exons with black outlines) within the chr8
insertion. Low levels of normal DMD splicing (from
exons 43 and 44; blue exons) are also observed. Frame of splicing in
pseudoexons and LINC00251 exons not shown. (C) Family C: intronic
c.3603+820G>T (black arrow) increases the strength of the
polypyrimidine tract leading to use of a cryptic acceptor splice site
(3/5 algorithms within Alamut Visual biosoftware predictions;
MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, and GeneSplicer) leading to inclusion of a 84-bp
pseudoexon (red, within DMD intron 26) into the
DMD mRNA, encoding a stop codon (red arrow) 39
nucleotides into the pseudoexon. Gene direction is demonstrated by gray
arrows. Reading frame between exons is shown by shape complementarity.
(D) Family D: inversion of DMD exon 51 and flanking
adjacent intronic sequence. Flanking the structural rearrangement are 2
intronic deletions (orange 3.5 kb and purple 44 bp) and an insertion of
CCAATA (green). mRNA studies show exon 51 skipping, causing a frameshift
and a premature stop codon (TAG, encoded by exon 52; red arrow). (E)
Family E: A 2.6-Mb inversion on the X chromosome between 2 breakpoints;
A in intron 45 of CFAP47, 1.9 Mb upstream of exon 1 of
DMD (GRCh37:chrX:35,180,364) and B in intron 18 of
DMD (GRCh37:chrX:32,521,892, NM_004006.2). This
reverses the orientation of exons 1–18 of DMD,
which are now joined to CFAP47 sequences upstream of
exon. The DMD gene is in blue, exons dark blue, and
introns light blue. Intergenic sequence (non-DMD ChrX
in green). (F) Family F: A 4.1-Mb inversion on the X chromosome between
2 breakpoints; A is 3.8 Mb upstream of exon 1 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:36236087) and B in intron 44 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:32122714). This reverses the orientation of exons
1–44 of DMD, which are now joined to intergenic
sequence upstream of exon 1. This is accompanied by duplication of exons
31–37 (orange) and exons 43 and 44 (purple) around the
breakpoint. (G) Family G: A 119.8-Mb inversion on the X chromosome
between 2 breakpoints; A in an intergenic region on the q arm of the X
chromosome, 118 Mb upstream of exon 1 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:151,194,962), and B in intron 60 of DMD
(GRCh37:chrX:31,379,010, NM_004006.2). This reverses the orientation of
exons 1–60 of DMD, which are now joined to
intergenic sequence upstream of exon 1. In addition, 2 deletions were
identified at these breakpoints; an intronic 63 bp deletion (orange,
GRCh37:chrX:31,378,947-31,379,009) and an intergenic 18 bp deletion
(purple, GRCh37:chrX:151,194,963-151,194,980). X chromosome displayed in
unusual orientation with q arm to the left, so the DMD
gene is presented with exons in order. DMD =
DMD gene or transcript. mRNA = messenger
RNA.RNA-seq for BIV:1 showed low levels of DMD transcripts, with a
distinct drop in reads from exon 44 onward (figure
2A, arrow). Bespoke realignment and analyses of WGS data identified
insertion of ∼118,000 nt of chromosome 8 (chr8) sequences within
DMD intron 43, encompassing the LINC00251
gene locus. RT-PCR showed that the chr8 insertion induced abnormal splicing of
the DMD gene (figure 3B).
Multiple adverse events were detected that involved splicing from exon 43 of
DMD to various pseudoexons and LINC00251
exons within the chr8 insertion. Sanger sequencing with bespoke PCR over the
breakpoints on gDNA confirmed the chr8 inclusion in intron 43 and provided a
diagnostic assay that confirmed segregation of the insertion within the family
pedigree. Normal splicing of DMD exons 42-43-44-45 was observed
as a low-frequency event (figure 2, B and
D).For CII:2, manual analysis of RNA-seq data identified abnormal inclusion of 84 nt
from intron 26 into a majority of DMD transcripts (figure 3C). Sanger sequencing of the genomic
region in gDNA from CII:2 identified a deep intronic variant
GRCh37:ChrX:32471959C>A, c.3603+820G>T that was absent in gnomAD.
The DMD c.3603+820G>T variant in intron 26 disrupts
an AG, creating an AG-exclusion zone between an available consensus lariat
branch point and 3′ splice site.[27] Spliceosomal use of a naturally occurring consensus
5′ splice site sequence and this strengthened 3′ splice site
result in the inclusion of a variant-activated pseudoexon into a majority of
DMD transcripts, encoding 19 missense amino acids followed
by a stop codon (figure 3C). RT-PCR
confirmed abnormal inclusion of the variant-activated pseudoexon into
DMD transcripts and residual, low levels of
DMD transcripts with normal splicing of exons 25-26-27
(figure 2E). Sanger sequencing
confirmed that the c.3603+820G>T variant was de novo in CII:2.For DII:1, RNA-seq in a previous study[20] showed low levels of DMD transcripts
with exon 51 skipping, inducing a frameshift and premature stop codon encoded by
exon 52 (r.7310_7542del, p.Ser2437Cysfs*33, figure 3D). Interrogation of WGS determined presence of a
DMD structural rearrangement rendering DMD
exon 51 in the reverse orientation and unable to be spliced into the
DMD mRNA, confirmed by Sanger sequencing. RT-PCR confirms
exon 51 skipping as the predominant mis-splicing event in DII:1, with skipping
of exons 50 and 51 a low-frequency, in-frame event observed in both DII:1 and
controls (figure 2F). Low levels of exon 50
and 51 skipping are consistent with low levels of dystrophin detected by WB
analysis (figure 4C).
Figure 4
Western Blot Panel for All Patients
(A.a) Western blot was performed on skeletal muscle from index patients
from families A and B (AII:1 and BIV:1) against DYS1 (rod domain
epitope) and Rb-DMD (C-terminal epitope) with serial dilutions (1/2,
3/4, 5/6, and 9/10) human control skeletal muscle. Muscle lysate derived
from an individual with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and undetectable
levels of dystrophin by Western blot (DMD control; deltoid, 14-year-old
boy, GRCh37:chrX:32364116G>A, NM_004006.2:c.5530C>T,
p.Arg1844*) were added to diluted controls to normalize total
protein loading in each lane of the gel. Loading controls: a-actinin-2
and myosin (coomassie). (A.b) Image J[23] was used to measure the densities of
the patient and serially diluted controls bands to create a standard
curve. Quantification of relative dystrophin levels was performed by
comparing patient sample densities to the control standard curves across
the 3 gels shown. AII:1 demonstrates 15.5% ± 1.9% levels of
dystrophin protein relative to controls. BIV:1 demonstrates 9.6% ±
1.7% levels of dystrophin protein relative to control. (B) Western blot
analysis on skeletal muscle from patient CII:2 against DYS1 shows
undetectable levels of dystrophin compared with controls. Loading
controls: myosin (coomassie). (C) Western blot analysis on skeletal
muscle from patients DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and GII:1 against DYS1
compared with human control skeletal muscle. DII:1 shows very low levels
of dystrophin. EII:1 FII:6, and GII:1 show undetectable levels of
dystrophin. Loading controls: a-actinin-2 and sarcomeric actin. Male
controls used: C1, tibialis anterior, 16 years; C2, unknown, 5.5 years;
C3, unknown, 14 years; C4, quadriceps, 4.5 years. DMD = Duchenne
muscular dystrophy.
Western Blot Panel for All Patients
(A.a) Western blot was performed on skeletal muscle from index patients
from families A and B (AII:1 and BIV:1) against DYS1 (rod domain
epitope) and Rb-DMD (C-terminal epitope) with serial dilutions (1/2,
3/4, 5/6, and 9/10) human control skeletal muscle. Muscle lysate derived
from an individual with Duchenne muscular dystrophy and undetectable
levels of dystrophin by Western blot (DMD control; deltoid, 14-year-old
boy, GRCh37:chrX:32364116G>A, NM_004006.2:c.5530C>T,
p.Arg1844*) were added to diluted controls to normalize total
protein loading in each lane of the gel. Loading controls: a-actinin-2
and myosin (coomassie). (A.b) Image J[23] was used to measure the densities of
the patient and serially diluted controls bands to create a standard
curve. Quantification of relative dystrophin levels was performed by
comparing patient sample densities to the control standard curves across
the 3 gels shown. AII:1 demonstrates 15.5% ± 1.9% levels of
dystrophin protein relative to controls. BIV:1 demonstrates 9.6% ±
1.7% levels of dystrophin protein relative to control. (B) Western blot
analysis on skeletal muscle from patient CII:2 against DYS1 shows
undetectable levels of dystrophin compared with controls. Loading
controls: myosin (coomassie). (C) Western blot analysis on skeletal
muscle from patients DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and GII:1 against DYS1
compared with human control skeletal muscle. DII:1 shows very low levels
of dystrophin. EII:1 FII:6, and GII:1 show undetectable levels of
dystrophin. Loading controls: a-actinin-2 and sarcomeric actin. Male
controls used: C1, tibialis anterior, 16 years; C2, unknown, 5.5 years;
C3, unknown, 14 years; C4, quadriceps, 4.5 years. DMD = Duchenne
muscular dystrophy.RNA-seq showed an abrupt loss of transcripts after exon 18 in EII:1, as
previously described in reference 20
(figure 2). WGS showed evidence for an
inversion within the DMD gene reversing the orientation of
exons 1–18 of DMD, which are now joined to intergenic
sequences upstream of exon 1, explaining the presence of abruptly terminating
exon 1–18 transcripts transcribed from the DMD promoter
(figure 3E). The 1.9 Mb intergenic
region included in the inversion contains FAM47A,
FAM47B, and TMEM47 genes. Sanger
sequencing of genomic DNA over the breakpoints confirmed the inversion.FII:6 with in-frame duplications of exons 31–37 and 43–44
identified on DMD MLPA, was shown by WGS to have a larger, more
complex structural rearrangement (figure
3F), which reverses the orientation of exons 1–44 of
DMD which are now joined to intron 45 of
CFAP47, upstream of exon 1. Expression of
CFAP47 is likely to be disrupted. However, the clinical
significance of loss of CFAP47 expression is unknown.In GII:1, RNA-seq in a previous study[20] showed low read count for DMD
transcripts, with evidence for even fewer reads from exon 60. Closer scrutiny of
whole-genome sequencing data identified a structural rearrangement reversing the
orientation of exons 1–60 of DMD, which are now joined
to intergenic sequences upstream of exon 1 (figure
3G). Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA over the breakpoints confirmed
the inversion.
WB Analyses Define the Threshold of WT Dystrophin Conferring Clinical
Phenotypes of Duchenne to Myalgia
Our splicing studies reveal that AII:1, BIV:1, and CII:2 each have residual
levels of normally spliced DMD transcripts, with abnormal
splicing events apparently targeted for degradation by nonsense-mediated decay
(figure 2, B–E). Therefore,
these individuals uniquely provide an opportunity to quantify levels of WT
dystrophin and correlate with clinical phenotype. Quantitative WB (figure 4) using skeletal muscle biospecimens
reveals (1) ∼15% ± 2% normal dystrophin levels in AII:1, correlating
with a myalgia phenotype without apparent weakness; (2) ∼10% ± 2%
levels of dystrophin in BIV:1 (figure 4A)
with Becker muscular dystrophy, mild weakness, and cardiac phenotype; and (3);
0%–5% levels of dystrophin in affected individuals who present with a
severe Becker (CII:2) or Duchenne phenotype (DII:1, EII:1, FII:6, and GII:1)
(figure 4, B and C).
Discussion
Our study further substantiates DMD splicing variants as an
important causal basis for males presenting with symptoms consistent with a
dystrophinopathy, for whom exomic sequencing approaches or MLPA return negative
findings. A causal splicing variant in DMD was identified in all 7
families within our dystrophinopathy cohort and includes 13 affected males
presenting with hyperCKemia with pain and/or muscle weakness and/or cardiac
involvement.Importantly, identification of the causative variant in DMD within
this hard-to-diagnose cohort required deployment of WGS, RNA-seq and/or bespoke
RT-PCR studies of mRNA isolated from skeletal muscle. For example, for CII:2,
RNA-seq was crucial to identify the inclusion of an 84 base pair (bp) pseudoexon
encoding a frameshift which prompted Sanger sequencing of this region, which lead to
the identification of the casual intron 26 c.3603+820G>T variant, which
was undetectable by gene panel testing, Sanger sequencing of the individual exons or
MLPA. Although multiple genetic investigations are costly and not available
currently to many diagnostic laboratories, costs incurred through muscle biopsy,
WGS, or RNA studies are insignificant relative to the cost burden to health services
for dystrophinopathy cases, for example, the heart transplantation for family B. A
precise genetic diagnosis for an X-linked disorder has important and wide-reaching
implications for genetic, prenatal, and prognostic counseling across the wider
family unit and can inform reproductive decision making. In addition, a genetic
diagnosis could enable future customizable treatments such as splice-modulating
antisense oligonucleotide drugs,[28]
which would theoretically be applicable to families A, C, and D.Although WGS and RNA-seq bring powerful adjunct tests to clinical genomics,
shortcomings of short read massively parallel sequencing were clearly observed in
this study. As human exons are typically 100–150 bp in length, short-read
RNA-seq is limited in that a single read does not effectively bridge multiple exons.
Most significantly, RNA-seq for BIV:1, DII:1, EII:1, and GII:1 was confounded by the
effectiveness of nonsense-mediated decay, an innate surveillance mechanism that
degrades mRNA bearing a premature stop codon.[15,17] We suspect that
the reason we do not see a profound reduction in read depth for AII:1 (figure 2A) is due in part to higher read depth
across the transcriptome, including DMD, and in part to the
residual normal splicing of a significant proportion of DMD
transcripts (27%). Nonsense-mediated decay amplifies inherent challenges associated
with RNA-seq of very large mRNAs, where mRNA capture and sequencing library
construction result in a characteristic bias in read depth, with vastly more reads
at the 3′ end than the 5′ end of a very long mRNA. Notably, common
disease genes in neuromuscular disorders are among the largest coding mRNAs in
humans, with DMD mRNA ∼14,000 nt, NEB mRNA
∼50,000 nt, and TTN mRNA ∼100,000 nt. Therefore,
ribosomal RNA depletion and/or long read RNA-seq approaches, which display reduced
3′ bias, may be more effective for diagnosing neuromuscular disorders.Regular data filtering approaches of genomic sequencing failed to identify most of
the causal variants (excluding families A and C found on RNA-seq). This is likely
due to the nature of the variants themselves (noncanonical splice affecting variants
or structural variants), small read lengths, and mapping restrictions against the
reference sequence. The structural rearrangement within DMD intron
43 of family B took extensive bioinformatic analysis to delineate, even when our
RT-PCR (data not shown) and RNA-seq studies had indicated intron 43 as the likely
location of the problem. Although (in retrospect) the copy number variation of the
duplicated region of chr8 is evident, informatics approaches to map split reads to
precisely define the breakpoints were challenging and ultimately required both
informatics and Sanger sequencing of PCR amplicons to fully resolve. Of note, the
bespoke PCR uniquely identifying the DMD intron 43 structural
rearrangement was clinically preferred as the diagnostic test for segregation and
carrier testing due to its greater specificity relative to the microarray to detect
the chr8 copy number variation. The availability of a validated bespoke PCR also
means that carrier females in this family could have prenatal diagnosis of male
pregnancies.Although families B, D, and G have cardiac involvement that is common in
dystrophinopathy, families A, C, E, and F do not have reported cardiac symptoms and
are being monitored for possible development of cardiac symptoms. The profound
cardiac involvement in family B raises suspicion of potential differences in
DMD pre-mRNA mis-splicing between cardiac and skeletal muscle
activated by the insertion of 118 kb of Chr8 sequences containing the LINC00251
gene. It is plausible that the severe cardiac involvement in family B is due to more
fully penetrant DMD mis-splicing in cardiac tissue compared with
skeletal muscle. Unfortunately, no stored cardiac specimens were available for mRNA
studies from other affected family members who had undergone transplant surgery. It
is also possible that levels of inclusion of the frameshifting pseudoexon in family
C may differ between skeletal muscle (and potentially between different skeletal
muscles) and cardiac muscle.In conclusion, we highlight DMD splicing variants as an important
causal basis in individuals with a suspected dystrophinopathy who remain undiagnosed
after exomic sequencing or MLPA approaches. Causative DMD variants
identified in AII:1, BIV:1, and CII:2 that induce partial mis-splicing of
DMD mRNA provided us with a unique opportunity; each affected
individual produced varying levels of remnant, normally spliced DMD
mRNA, with all mis-spliced transcripts encoding a premature stop codon and targeted
by nonsense-mediated decay. Therefore, we were able to use quantitative WB to
correlate levels of WT dystrophin with clinical severity. We establish a steep
therapeutic range of WT dystrophin protein levels (figure 4A); with ∼15% WT dystrophin associated with myalgia
without apparent weakness, ∼10% levels of WT dystrophin associated with
Becker muscular dystrophy, mild weakness, and cardiac phenotype, and <5% WT
dystrophin associated with a severe Becker or Duchenne-like phenotype. Our findings
broadly concur with previous studies correlating levels of mutated dystrophin in BMD
with clinical severity,[7,29-31] supporting
the notion of a functional redundancy within the spectrin-like repeats of the
dystrophin rod domain. Of great relevance to international efforts to develop
genetic therapies in DMD, our data provide compelling evidence that with early
intervention, only fractional increases in levels of dystrophin are likely to result
in clinical improvement.
Authors: Hannah F Jones; Samantha J Bryen; Leigh B Waddell; Adam Bournazos; Mark Davis; Michelle A Farrar; Catriona A McLean; David R Mowat; Hugo Sampaio; Ian R Woodcock; Monique M Ryan; Kristi J Jones; Sandra T Cooper Journal: Neuromuscul Disord Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 4.296
Authors: Jinkuk Kim; Chunguang Hu; Christelle Moufawad El Achkar; Lauren E Black; Julie Douville; Austin Larson; Mary K Pendergast; Sara F Goldkind; Eunjung A Lee; Ashley Kuniholm; Aubrie Soucy; Jai Vaze; Nandkishore R Belur; Kristina Fredriksen; Iva Stojkovska; Alla Tsytsykova; Myriam Armant; Renata L DiDonato; Jaejoon Choi; Laura Cornelissen; Luis M Pereira; Erika F Augustine; Casie A Genetti; Kira Dies; Brenda Barton; Lucinda Williams; Benjamin D Goodlett; Bobbie L Riley; Amy Pasternak; Emily R Berry; Kelly A Pflock; Stephen Chu; Chantal Reed; Kimberly Tyndall; Pankaj B Agrawal; Alan H Beggs; P Ellen Grant; David K Urion; Richard O Snyder; Susan E Waisbren; Annapurna Poduri; Peter J Park; Al Patterson; Alessandra Biffi; Joseph R Mazzulli; Olaf Bodamer; Charles B Berde; Timothy W Yu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J C van den Bergen; B H Wokke; A A Janson; S G van Duinen; M A Hulsker; H B Ginjaar; J C van Deutekom; A Aartsma-Rus; H E Kan; J J Verschuuren Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2013-11-29 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Kevin M Flanigan; Diane M Dunn; Andrew von Niederhausern; Payam Soltanzadeh; Eduard Gappmaier; Michael T Howard; Jacinda B Sampson; Jerry R Mendell; Cheryl Wall; Wendy M King; Alan Pestronk; Julaine M Florence; Anne M Connolly; Katherine D Mathews; Carrie M Stephan; Karla S Laubenthal; Brenda L Wong; Paula J Morehart; Amy Meyer; Richard S Finkel; Carsten G Bonnemann; Livija Medne; John W Day; Joline C Dalton; Marcia K Margolis; Veronica J Hinton; Robert B Weiss Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: K M Bushby; N J Cleghorn; A Curtis; I D Haggerty; L V Nicholson; M A Johnson; J B Harris; S S Bhattacharya Journal: Hum Genet Date: 1991-12 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Apollonia T J M Helderman-van den Enden; Kamlesh Madan; Martijn H Breuning; Annemieke H van der Hout; Egbert Bakker; Christine E M de Die-Smulders; Hendrika B Ginjaar Journal: Eur J Hum Genet Date: 2012-06-06 Impact factor: 4.246
Authors: Marek Cmero; Breon Schmidt; Ian J Majewski; Paul G Ekert; Alicia Oshlack; Nadia M Davidson Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 13.583