Literature DB >> 26688396

Clinical outcomes of the very elderly undergoing enhanced recovery programmes in elective colorectal surgery.

M A Khan1, S Pandey1.   

Abstract

Introduction Enhanced recovery programmes (ERPs) have been shown to improve short-term outcomes after major colorectal surgery. Benefits of the ERP in patients who are very elderly (VE) are less well understood. We aimed to evaluate the role of the ERP in the VE population, which for the purpose of this study was defined as any patient aged 75 years or over. Methods A prospectively compiled database was used to identify all patients aged ≥75 years who underwent elective colorectal resection in our unit between January 2011 and September 2012. These data were analysed to study the short-term outcomes in these patients and compared with those of patients aged <75 years. Results Overall, 352 patients underwent elective surgery during this period; 106 were identified as VE. The median length of stay (LOS) in the VE group was 7 days (5 days in non-VE group; p=0.002). Two-thirds (62%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. The median LOS of VE patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery was 6 days (11 days for open surgery; p=0.003). A third (33%) of the VE cohort was discharged by day 5. Of these patients, 85% underwent laparoscopic surgery. There was no statistical difference in overall complication rates (VE vs non-VE). Conclusions Accepting that some VE patients may stay in hospital for longer, this study supports our current policy of including everyone in the ERP regardless of age. Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery appear to benefit, with a shorter LOS. Further large scale trials are required to support the results of this study and to identify long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal surgery; Elderly; Enhanced recovery programme

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26688396      PMCID: PMC5234371          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2015.0036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population.

Authors:  Katherine Grailey; Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Rima Aboud; Paul Ziprin; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians.

Authors:  P A Seshadri; J Mamazza; C M Schlachta; M O Cadeddu; E C Poulin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Laparoscopic colectomy in the elderly: when is too old?

Authors:  Matthew G Mutch
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

5.  Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(®)) Society recommendations.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; W Schwenk; N Demartines; D Roulin; N Francis; C E McNaught; J Macfie; A S Liberman; M Soop; A Hill; R H Kennedy; D N Lobo; K Fearon; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery produces better outcomes for high risk cancer patients compared to open surgery.

Authors:  Anil K Hemandas; Tarig Abdelrahman; Karen G Flashman; Angela J Skull; Asha Senapati; Daniel P O'Leary; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Laparoscopic surgery in the elderly patient.

Authors:  C Bàllesta López; J A Cid; I Poves; C Bettónica; L Villegas; M A Memon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Justin K Lawrence; Tamar Nobel; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Practical Management of Anaesthesia in the Elderly.

Authors:  Camilla Strøm; Lars Simon Rasmussen; Jacob Steinmetz
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Hospitalisation in an emergency department short-stay unit compared to an internal medicine department is associated with fewer complications in older patients - an observational study.

Authors:  Camilla Strøm; Talie Khadem Mollerup; Laurits Schou Kromberg; Lars Simon Rasmussen; Thomas Andersen Schmidt
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Nursing of Gastrointestinal Peristalsis Function Recovery after Abdominal Mirror Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Based on Intelligent Electronic Medicine.

Authors:  Yanyan Ding; Sujuan Zhu; Jieqiong Pang; Zhitao Li; Congkun Ming; Xiaofang Song
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery-ERAS-principles, practice and feasibility in the elderly.

Authors:  Olle Ljungqvist; Martin Hubner
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.636

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.