Literature DB >> 3397339

Selection on individual phenotype and best linear unbiased predictor of breeding value in a closed swine herd.

G M Belonsky1, B W Kennedy.   

Abstract

Computer simulation of a closed 100-sow and 4-boar swine herd was used to analyze effects of selection method on genetic change, inbreeding and genetic variance over 10 yr for traits with heritabilities (h2) of .10, .30 and .60. Selection of replacement animals was either on individual phenotype or best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) of breeding value using an animal model. For both methods, culling of existing breeding animals was at random on age and reproductive performance. The effect of additional culling of existing breeding animals when a replacement with better individual phenotype or BLUP of breeding value was available also was evaluated. Genetic gain was greater for selection on BLUP than on individual phenotype, but relative differences narrowed with increasing heritability. At yr 10 the relative advantage of selection on BLUP was 55% for h2 = .10, 25% for h2 = .30 and 10% for h2 = .60. Culling when a replacement with better individual phenotype or BLUP of breeding value was available resulted in considerably increased genetic progress (34% to 57%). The proportional effect of culling on rate of genetic gain was relatively independent of heritability and type of selection. Inbreeding (F) was higher with selection on BLUP (F = .27 to .38 at yr 10) than on individual phenotype (F = .17 to .22 at yr 10). As heritability increased, rate of inbreeding increased for selection on individual phenotype, but rate of inbreeding tended to decrease with increasing heritability for selection on BLUP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3397339     DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.6651124x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  13 in total

1.  Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value

Authors: 
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Prediction of rates of inbreeding in populations selected on best linear unbiased prediction of breeding value.

Authors:  P Bijma; J A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Improving the efficiency of artificial selection: more selection pressure with less inbreeding.

Authors:  L Sanchez; M A Toro; C García
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Population genetic structure in the Holstein breed in Brazil.

Authors:  Mário Henrique Magalhães Araújo da Silva; Carlos Henrique Mendes Malhado; José Lauro Costa; Jaime Araujo Cobuci; Claudio Napolis Costa; Paulo Luiz Souza Carneiro
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.559

5.  Optimal restricted phenotypic selection.

Authors:  R P Wei
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Long-term effects of selection based on the animal model BLUP in a finite population.

Authors:  E Verrier; J J Colleau; J L Foulley
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Selection response in finite populations.

Authors:  M Wei; A Caballero; W G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Dynamics of long-term genomic selection.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Jannink
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Paternity assessment: application on estimation of breeding value in body-weight at first egg trait of egg-laying duck (Anas platyrhynchos).

Authors:  Jindong Ren; Lizhi Lu; Xiaolin Liu; Zhengrong Tao; Congcong Zhang; Deqian Wang; Junda Shen; Weimeng Liu; Yong Tian; Zhigang Zhu
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 2.316

10.  Metagenomic predictions: from microbiome to complex health and environmental phenotypes in humans and cattle.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Ross; Peter J Moate; Leah C Marett; Ben G Cocks; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.